Contents show

When we begin exploring the fascinating world of near-death experiences, we quickly encounter a specialized vocabulary that can seem overwhelming at first. This glossary serves as your comprehensive guide through the terminology, providing not just simple definitions but a deep understanding of each concept from both scientific and theological perspectives. Each term has been carefully explained in accessible language while maintaining theological accuracy and incorporating insights from extensive research in the field.

As you read through these definitions, you’ll discover that understanding NDEs requires us to bridge multiple disciplines—from neuroscience to theology, from philosophy to medicine. This glossary will equip you with the knowledge needed to engage thoughtfully with NDE accounts and to apply biblical discernment to these remarkable experiences.

Near-Death Experience (NDE)

A Near-Death Experience, commonly abbreviated as NDE, represents one of the most profound and mysterious phenomena documented in modern times. At its most basic level, an NDE is a powerful, often life-changing experience that occurs when a person comes extremely close to death or, in many cases, meets the clinical criteria for death before being resuscitated. These experiences frequently involve a distinctive pattern of events that transcend ordinary consciousness and challenge our understanding of life, death, and the nature of human existence.

The term itself was coined in 1975 by Dr. Raymond Moody, a medical doctor with a PhD in philosophy, who noticed remarkable similarities among the accounts of over 150 survivors of close brushes with death. As documented in theological research, Moody identified “eleven key themes” that consistently appeared across different individuals who had no knowledge of each other’s experiences. These themes included “a sense of ineffability” (the inability to adequately describe the experience in words), “hearing themselves being pronounced dead,” “feelings of peace,” “going through a tunnel,” “meeting others” including deceased loved ones, “encountering a being of light,” experiencing “a life review,” and sensing they had “reached a border or limit” beyond which they could not return (Parnia, Lucid Dying, Chapter: “The Science Revolutionizing How We Understand Life and Death”).

Key Understanding: NDEs are not simply hallucinations or dreams. Research has shown they occur with “lucidity or hyper-lucidity” even when the brain shows minimal or no activity. This challenges our conventional understanding of consciousness and suggests something profound about the nature of human existence beyond physical death.

From a theological perspective, NDEs present both opportunities and challenges for Christian understanding. As noted in conservative Christian scholarship, “the NDE is typically an experience that conforms to the pattern of life after death, and that’s why so many return speaking in those terms. It is ‘afterlife-like,’ and it is very real” (Sabom, Light & Death, Chapter: “The Near-Death Experience”).

The prevalence of NDEs is far more common than many realize. Studies indicate that approximately “4-5% of the general population” and “10% of cardiac arrest survivors” report having had an NDE (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible With Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences?, Chapter 1). With modern medical advances in resuscitation techniques, these numbers continue to grow. Current estimates suggest that “about nine million people in the United States alone have reported this kind of experience” (Hagan, The Science of Near-Death Experiences, Chapter 2).

What makes NDEs particularly significant from a Christian perspective is their potential to serve as what researchers call “signposts” pointing toward spiritual realities. However, it’s crucial to understand that not all NDEs should be accepted uncritically as divine revelations. Some may be genuine glimpses of the afterlife, while others could be deceptive spiritual experiences requiring careful biblical discernment.

The experience typically unfolds in stages, though not everyone experiences all stages, and they don’t always occur in the same order. The common progression includes:

Initial Awareness: The person becomes aware that something extraordinary is happening. They may hear medical personnel declaring them dead or realize they’re having a medical crisis. This awareness is often accompanied by an unexpected sense of peace rather than panic.

Separation from the Body: Many experiencers report a sensation of leaving their physical body and observing it from an external vantage point, typically from above. This out-of-body experience often includes remarkably accurate observations of medical procedures and conversations that occurred while the person was clinically unconscious.

Transitional Phase: The person may experience movement through a dark space or tunnel, often toward a brilliant light. This journey frequently involves a sense of tremendous speed and purpose.

Otherworldly Realm: Upon emerging from the tunnel, experiencers often describe entering a realm of indescribable beauty, meeting deceased loved ones, encountering spiritual beings, or experiencing the presence of a loving, all-knowing being of light. Many Christians identify this being as Jesus Christ.

Life Review: A panoramic, instantaneous review of one’s life, focusing particularly on how one’s actions affected others. This review emphasizes love, compassion, and the spiritual significance of even seemingly minor acts.

The Return: Either by choice or because they’re told it’s “not their time,” the person returns to their physical body, often reluctantly, bringing with them profound changes in perspective and values.

Research has documented that NDEs produce consistent, measurable changes in those who experience them. As theological researchers note, “NDEs seemed to produce a stronger faith and a higher level of commitment to traditional religious practice” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter on Biblical Compatibility). These changes typically include:

A complete loss of fear of death, not from a desire to die but from a certainty that death is not the end. Increased compassion and love for others, with many experiencers dedicating their lives to service. A decreased interest in material possessions and status, replaced by a focus on spiritual growth and relationships. Enhanced intuitive abilities and sensitivity to others’ emotional states. A strong sense of life purpose and meaning.

It’s important to understand that NDEs occur across all cultures, religions, ages, and backgrounds. Children as young as three years old have reported NDEs with the same core elements as adults, though often described in simpler terms. This universality suggests that NDEs tap into something fundamental about human consciousness and spiritual reality.

From a scientific perspective, NDEs pose significant challenges to materialist explanations of consciousness. The fact that people report “enhanced mental functions while their brains are severely compromised, if not completely shut down” contradicts the assumption that consciousness is merely a product of brain activity (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Argument #2).

Biblical parallels to NDEs can be found throughout Scripture, providing a theological framework for understanding these experiences. The Apostle Paul’s experience described in 2 Corinthians 12:2-4 bears striking resemblance to modern NDE accounts: “I know a person in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven—whether in the body or out of the body I do not know; God knows.” Paul’s uncertainty about whether he was “in the body or out of the body” mirrors the confusion many modern experiencers feel about their state during an NDE.

However, Christians must approach NDEs with both openness and discernment. While many NDEs align beautifully with biblical teachings about the afterlife, others promote ideas that contradict Scripture. The key is to test these experiences against God’s Word, recognizing that while God may indeed grant glimpses of eternity to encourage and strengthen faith, not every spiritual experience is from God.

The theological significance of NDEs extends beyond individual experiences to broader questions about the nature of consciousness, the reality of the soul, and the existence of an afterlife. For Christians, NDEs can serve as powerful testimonies to the reality of spiritual dimensions, supporting the biblical worldview that humans are more than just physical bodies.

Out-of-Body Experience (OBE)

An Out-of-Body Experience represents one of the most intriguing and evidentially significant aspects of near-death experiences. During an OBE, a person perceives themselves as existing outside their physical body, typically observing their body and surroundings from an external vantage point. This phenomenon challenges our fundamental assumptions about consciousness, perception, and the relationship between mind and body.

The technical definition encompasses what researchers describe as “the material aspect” of NDEs, where “the NDEr perceives their consciousness to be functioning—typically lucidly or hyper-lucidly—at a location apart from their physical body, most commonly above the body but including even locations remote from it” (Hagan, The Science of Near-Death Experiences, Chapter on NDE Aspects). The term was originally coined in 1943 by British mathematician George Nugent Merle Tyrrell, though the experience itself has been reported throughout history.

Critical Evidence: What makes OBEs particularly significant is veridical perception—the ability to accurately observe and later report details that should have been impossible to perceive from the position of the physical body, especially when the person was clinically unconscious or even blind from birth.

The characteristics of perception during OBEs often differ dramatically from normal physical vision. As documented in research with blind individuals, including those blind from birth, OBE perception may be “panoramic, 360 degrees, all around, like a sphere” or involve “fine grain perception, very detailed, seeing every speck of dust, or every single hair” (Ring & Cooper, Mindsight, Chapter on OBE Perception). Some experiencers report being able to see through solid objects, which appear transparent, or observe events occurring in distant locations.

From a biblical perspective, OBEs find potential precedent in several scriptural passages. The Apostle Paul’s experience of being “caught up to the third heaven” explicitly mentions his uncertainty about whether he was “in the body or out of the body” (2 Corinthians 12:2-3). This biblical account provides a theological framework for understanding that consciousness might, under certain circumstances, function independently of the physical body.

Theological scholars have grappled with the implications of OBEs for understanding human nature. As one researcher notes, “The apostle Paul may have had a near-death experience when he was stoned at Lystra and left for dead (Acts 14:19). When writing of this personal encounter 14 years later, Paul twice stated for emphasis that he was uncertain whether he was ‘in the body’ or ‘out of the body,’ that only ‘God knows'” (Sabom, Light & Death, Chapter on Spiritual Experience).

The evidential value of OBEs cannot be overstated. Numerous cases have been documented where individuals accurately reported specific details of their resuscitation procedures, conversations among medical staff, or events in other locations while they were clinically unconscious. One famous case involved a patient who accurately described “the location of their dentures, which were removed while they were comatose” and another who saw “a specific object (e.g., a sticker on a fan) from a vantage point outside their body” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 7).

Perhaps most remarkably, people blind from birth have reported visual perceptions during OBEs. In one documented case, a woman blind from birth named Vicki “had a clear, detailed and a natural-seeming visual representation of the persons and environment” during her NDE, accurately describing things she had never seen before (Ring & Cooper, Mindsight, Chapter on Vicki’s Experience).

The theological implications of OBEs are profound. If consciousness can indeed function independently of the physical brain, this provides powerful support for substance dualism—the biblical view that humans consist of both a physical body and an immaterial soul or spirit. As theological researchers argue, “If consciousness can perceive verifiable information while the brain is clinically non-functional, then consciousness cannot be merely a product of the brain. It must be a separate entity (the soul)” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 7).

OBEs typically occur in several contexts:

During Medical Crises: The most common and well-documented OBEs occur during cardiac arrest, severe trauma, or surgical procedures. These experiences often begin suddenly, with the person finding themselves floating above their body, observing medical procedures with remarkable clarity.

Spontaneous Occurrences: Some people report OBEs occurring spontaneously during meditation, extreme fatigue, or even during sleep. While these lack the life-threatening context of NDEs, they share many similar characteristics.

Induced Experiences: Some claim to be able to induce OBEs through various techniques, though these induced experiences often differ qualitatively from spontaneous OBEs associated with NDEs.

The phenomenology of OBEs—how they’re experienced subjectively—reveals consistent patterns across cultures and individuals:

Initial Separation: The experience often begins with a sensation of vibration, a popping or clicking sound, or a feeling of being pulled or lifted out of the body. Some describe it as a “tumbling sensation” or simply finding themselves suddenly outside their body without any transition.

Perspective and Movement: Most commonly, people find themselves floating near the ceiling, looking down at their body. Movement is typically described as thought-directed—simply thinking about being in a location results in instantaneous movement there. Physical barriers like walls or ceilings pose no obstacle.

Enhanced Perception: Despite being separated from their physical sensory organs, experiencers often report enhanced clarity of perception. Colors may appear more vivid, details more sharp, and awareness more expansive than in normal waking consciousness.

The Cord Connection: Some experiencers report seeing a silver or golden cord connecting their consciousness to their physical body, though this is not universal. This detail has led to speculation about biblical passages like Ecclesiastes 12:6, which mentions a “silver cord” in the context of death.

Scientific attempts to explain OBEs through purely materialist means have consistently fallen short. Theories involving “temporal lobe seizures,” “REM intrusion,” or “dying brain hypotheses” fail to account for the veridical perceptions that occur during these experiences. As noted by researchers, explanations based on “oxygen deprivation, hallucinations, DMT-like substances released in a dying brain” have been “tested again and again and ruled out” (Miller, Near-Death Experiences as Evidence, Introduction).

The challenge OBEs pose to materialist science is summarized well by one researcher: “How the soul can ‘see,’ a physical process requiring the optical mechanisms of the eye, from a vantage point distant from the body is not understood. All we can say at this point is that it seems that the soul is not dependent on the body to accomplish functions we normally think of as requiring physical organs and physiological processes” (Sabom, Light & Death, Chapter on OBE Analysis).

For Christians, OBEs provide evidential support for several key theological beliefs:

The Reality of the Soul: OBEs suggest that consciousness (the soul) can exist and function independently of the physical body, supporting the biblical teaching that humans are “creatures made out of a material body and a nonmaterial soul” (Sabom quoting R.C. Sproul, Light & Death).

Life After Death: If consciousness can separate from and survive outside the body temporarily, this supports the possibility of consciousness surviving bodily death permanently.

The Intermediate State: OBEs may provide insight into the intermediate state between death and resurrection, when believers are “away from the body and at home with the Lord” (2 Corinthians 5:8).

However, Christians must also exercise caution and discernment regarding OBEs. Not all such experiences are necessarily from God, and some may be counterfeit spiritual experiences. The Bible warns us to “test the spirits” (1 John 4:1) and to evaluate all spiritual experiences against the standard of Scripture.

Being of Light

The Being of Light represents perhaps the most profound and transformative element of many near-death experiences. This entity, described as a “highly luminous, powerful, yet compassionate and benevolent entity,” serves as a central figure in the otherworldly realm encountered during NDEs (Parnia, Lucid Dying, Chapter on Moody’s Research). For many Christian experiencers, this Being is immediately recognized as Jesus Christ, while others simply describe an overwhelming presence of perfect love and knowledge.

The characteristics of this Being are remarkably consistent across thousands of NDE accounts. Experiencers describe encountering a presence that radiates brilliant light—not harsh or blinding, but warm, welcoming, and suffused with unconditional love. As one researcher documents, the Being of Light is experienced as having “personality” and “communicated telepathically” while being “pure TRUTH” (Atwater, The Big Book of Near-Death Experiences, Chapter on Experience Types).

The theological significance of Being of Light encounters cannot be overstated—they often serve as the pivotal moment that transforms the experiencer’s understanding of God, love, and the purpose of human existence.

From a biblical perspective, the Being of Light aligns remarkably with scriptural descriptions of God’s nature. The apostle John writes, “God is light; in him there is no darkness at all” (1 John 1:5). The correlation between NDE descriptions and biblical imagery extends further: “The Being of Light aligns with ‘God is light’ (1 John 1:5) and the glory of the Lamb (Revelation 21:23)” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 6).

The encounter with the Being of Light typically involves several consistent elements:

Recognition and Knowing: Many experiencers report an immediate sense of recognition, as if reuniting with someone they’ve always known. This knowing transcends mere intellectual recognition—it’s described as a soul-deep familiarity. Christians often specifically identify this being as Jesus, describing features that accord with biblical and traditional depictions, though the experience transcends any artistic representation.

Telepathic Communication: Communication with the Being of Light occurs without spoken words. Thoughts and feelings are exchanged instantaneously and perfectly. As documented in research, “There was absolutely no possibility of hiding, distorting information, or lying in communicating with the LIGHT” (Atwater, Big Book). This perfect communication often involves not just the transfer of information but the experience of pure understanding.

Unconditional Love: Perhaps the most universally reported aspect is the experience of being completely known—including all one’s faults and failures—yet being completely loved and accepted. This love is described as unlike anything experienced on earth: infinitely patient, totally understanding, and absolutely unconditional. Many experiencers report that this encounter with perfect love becomes the standard by which they measure all earthly relationships thereafter.

Life Review Facilitation: The Being of Light often serves as a guide during the life review process, helping the experiencer understand the significance of their actions from an eternal perspective. Rather than judging or condemning, the Being helps the person see how their choices affected others, emphasizing lessons about love and compassion.

Important Distinction: While many NDEs feature encounters with a Being of Light that aligns with Christian understanding of Jesus, not all such encounters are necessarily authentic divine experiences. Some may be deceptive spiritual encounters designed to mislead. This is why biblical discernment is crucial.

The visual characteristics of the Being of Light are particularly striking. Despite the intensity of the light, experiencers consistently report that it doesn’t hurt their eyes. One experiencer noted: “It wasn’t unpleasant… it was very intense. I know I couldn’t have stood it if I were myself ordinarily, but because I knew I was not myself ordinarily, I knew I could stand it” (Ring & Cooper, Mindsight, Vicki’s Account).

For those who identify the Being as Jesus, the descriptions often include specific details. However, it’s important to note that not all reported encounters with “Jesus” in NDEs present theologically sound messages. Some accounts include teachings that contradict Scripture, suggesting that discernment is necessary even when an entity presents itself as Christ.

The transformative power of encountering the Being of Light is well-documented. Experiencers frequently report that this encounter fundamentally changed their understanding of:

The Nature of God: Many who had viewed God as distant, judgmental, or punitive discover a God of infinite love, compassion, and accessibility. This often leads to a renewed or deepened faith commitment.

The Purpose of Life: The encounter typically emphasizes that love—both giving and receiving—is the primary purpose of human existence. Material success, power, and prestige are revealed as ultimately meaningless compared to how we treat others.

Personal Identity: Experiencers often report discovering their true nature as eternal spiritual beings temporarily inhabiting physical bodies. They describe feeling more authentically themselves in the presence of the Being than they ever felt in physical life.

Spiritual Reality: The encounter provides experiential confirmation that spiritual dimensions are not merely concepts but concrete realities more vivid and substantial than physical existence.

Theological researchers have noted important patterns in Being of Light encounters that align with biblical teaching. The Being typically:

Emphasizes love as the highest value, consistent with Jesus’s teaching that the greatest commandments involve loving God and loving others (Matthew 22:37-39). Demonstrates perfect knowledge of the experiencer’s life, aligning with biblical teachings about God’s omniscience. Offers forgiveness and acceptance rather than condemnation, reflecting the gospel message of grace. Sends the experiencer back with a renewed sense of purpose and mission, similar to biblical accounts of divine commissioning.

However, researchers also note concerning patterns in some Being of Light encounters that require careful evaluation:

Universalist Messages: Some experiencers report being told that all religions lead to God or that everyone is ultimately saved regardless of their beliefs or choices. This contradicts Jesus’s teaching that He is “the way, the truth, and the life” and that “no one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6).

Absence of Repentance: Some accounts describe unconditional acceptance without any call to repentance or transformation, potentially contradicting biblical teachings about the necessity of repentance for salvation.

New Revelations: Some experiencers claim to receive new spiritual teachings that add to or contradict Scripture, which should raise red flags for Christians who believe in the sufficiency of biblical revelation.

The apostle Paul’s warning is particularly relevant here: “Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light” (2 Corinthians 11:14). This doesn’t mean all Being of Light encounters are deceptive, but it does mean Christians must carefully evaluate these experiences against biblical truth.

Scientific attempts to explain Being of Light encounters through materialist frameworks have been notably unsuccessful. Theories involving “temporal lobe stimulation” or “dying brain phenomena” fail to account for the transformative and lasting effects of these encounters, the consistency of the experience across cultures, and the veridical information sometimes conveyed during these meetings.

For Christians seeking to understand Being of Light encounters, several principles prove helpful:

Test the Message: Evaluate what the Being communicated against Scripture. Does it affirm the uniqueness of Christ? Does it align with biblical teaching about salvation, judgment, and eternity?

Examine the Fruit: Jesus taught that we can recognize truth by its fruit (Matthew 7:16). Do Being of Light encounters lead to greater love, humility, and service? Or do they produce spiritual pride, disregard for biblical authority, or moral compromise?

Consider the Context: Encounters that occur within a broader NDE that includes other biblically consistent elements may be more trustworthy than isolated experiences or those accompanied by unbiblical messages.

Maintain Humility: While the Bible is our ultimate authority, we should remain humble about the mysteries of divine encounters. God may indeed grant genuine glimpses of His glory to individuals for His purposes.

Life Review

The Life Review stands as one of the most profound and morally instructive elements of the near-death experience. Described as a “panoramic, instantaneous review of one’s life,” this experience goes far beyond simple reminiscence or memory recall (Moody, cited in Parnia, Lucid Dying). Instead, it represents a complete re-experiencing of one’s entire existence from a dramatically expanded perspective that includes not only one’s own thoughts and feelings but also the impact of one’s actions on others.

The life review typically unfolds as what researchers describe as “a reappraisal and self-judgment of their own actions in life in a meaningful and purposeful way, viewed and analyzed from the perspective of ethics and morality” (Parnia, Lucid Dying, Chapter on NDE Themes). This is not merely watching one’s life like a movie but rather experiencing it multidimensionally, often from the perspectives of everyone affected by one’s actions.

From a theological standpoint, the life review bears striking resemblance to biblical concepts of divine judgment and accountability. The parallel with 2 Corinthians 5:10 is particularly notable: “For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad.” Researchers have noted that “The Life Review parallels the Judgment Seat of Christ” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 6).

Crucial Insight: The life review is not about condemnation but education. It reveals that every action, word, and even thought has eternal significance, rippling outward to affect others in ways we rarely comprehend during earthly life.

The characteristics of the life review are remarkably consistent across thousands of accounts:

Instantaneous Totality: The entire life is perceived simultaneously, not sequentially. Past, present, and sometimes even future consequences of actions are experienced in what experiencers describe as an eternal “now.” Time as we understand it ceases to exist, allowing for complete comprehension of a lifetime’s worth of experiences in what earthly time would measure as an instant.

Empathic Expansion: Perhaps the most transformative aspect involves experiencing one’s actions from the perspective of others. When the experiencer recalls hurting someone, they literally feel that person’s pain. When they remember acts of kindness, they experience the joy and relief those acts brought to others. This empathic experience often extends through chains of causation—seeing how one’s actions affected others, who in turn affected still others, creating ripples through time and relationships.

Emphasis on Love and Learning: The life review consistently emphasizes two primary themes: how well the person loved others and what they learned from their experiences. Material achievements, professional success, and social status—things often valued highly in earthly life—are revealed as largely irrelevant. Instead, seemingly minor acts of kindness or cruelty take on profound significance.

Absence of External Judgment: Remarkably, most experiencers report that they judge themselves during the life review. The Being of Light or other spiritual presences serve as compassionate guides, helping the person understand their life’s significance, but the actual judgment comes from within as the person sees their life from this expanded perspective.

The biblical foundations for understanding the life review are extensive. Jesus’s teaching that “there is nothing hidden that will not be disclosed, and nothing concealed that will not be known or brought out into the open” (Luke 8:17) takes on new meaning in light of NDE accounts. The life review seems to be a fulfillment of this promise, where the true nature and consequences of all actions are fully revealed.

Scripture repeatedly emphasizes that God will “bring to light what is hidden in darkness and will expose the motives of the heart” (1 Corinthians 4:5). The life review appears to be precisely this kind of revelation, though occurring in a context of love and education rather than punitive judgment.

The content of life reviews reveals consistent patterns about what matters from an eternal perspective:

Small Acts, Great Significance: Experiencers frequently report surprise at which moments from their lives receive emphasis. A brief smile given to a struggling stranger, a patient moment with a child, or a simple act of forgiveness may be revealed as having profound spiritual significance. Conversely, achievements that brought earthly recognition often pass without mention.

Intentions Matter: The life review reveals not just actions but the motivations behind them. Acts that appeared generous outwardly but were motivated by self-interest are exposed, while hidden acts of genuine love are celebrated. This aligns with biblical teaching that God “judges the thoughts and attitudes of the heart” (Hebrews 4:12).

Unfinished Business: Many experiencers report being shown the consequences of unresolved conflicts, unforgiven grievances, and unexpressed love. This often becomes a primary motivation for their return to earthly life—to heal relationships and complete unfinished spiritual work.

Knowledge and Growth: The review often emphasizes moments of learning and spiritual growth, particularly lessons learned through suffering or failure. This suggests that earth life serves as a kind of school for spiritual development, with challenges serving as opportunities for growth rather than mere obstacles.

The transformative effects of experiencing a life review are profound and lasting. Researchers document that those who undergo life reviews typically return with:

Enhanced empathy and compassion, having literally experienced how their actions affect others. A fundamental reordering of priorities, valuing relationships and kindness over material success. Increased mindfulness about the impact of their daily choices and interactions. A strong sense of personal responsibility for their influence on others. Motivation to seek forgiveness and reconciliation where needed.

From a pastoral and theological perspective, the life review offers several important insights:

Universal Accountability: The life review suggests that all humans, regardless of religious belief, will face a moment of complete moral clarity about their lives. This aligns with Romans 2:14-16, which speaks of God judging people’s secrets and the law written on human hearts.

Grace and Truth: While the life review involves confronting one’s failures and shortcomings, it occurs in a context of love and acceptance, reflecting the biblical balance of grace and truth (John 1:14). The purpose appears to be redemptive education rather than condemnation.

Present Implications: Understanding the life review can motivate believers to live more consciously and compassionately now, knowing that every interaction has eternal significance. As Paul writes, “Let us not become weary in doing good, for at the proper time we will reap a harvest if we do not give up” (Galatians 6:9).

However, Christians must also note what the life review, as reported in NDEs, sometimes lacks:

The Role of Christ’s Atonement: While life reviews emphasize personal accountability, they don’t always clearly articulate the role of Christ’s sacrifice in dealing with sin. The focus on self-judgment may inadvertently minimize the necessity of divine forgiveness through Christ.

The Reality of Sin: Some life review accounts seem to minimize the seriousness of sin, treating all failures as simply learning experiences rather than rebellion against a holy God requiring redemption.

The Basis of Salvation: Life reviews might give the impression that salvation is earned through good deeds or learning lessons, rather than received by grace through faith in Christ.

These potential theological tensions remind us that while NDEs may provide valuable insights, they must be evaluated against the full counsel of Scripture. The life review may indeed be a genuine spiritual experience that God uses to transform lives, but our understanding of judgment, salvation, and eternal destiny must remain grounded in biblical revelation.

Veridical Perception

Veridical Perception represents the most evidentially powerful aspect of near-death experiences, providing what many researchers consider proof that consciousness can function independently of the physical brain. The term “veridical” means “truthful” or “corresponding to reality,” and in the context of NDEs, it refers to accurate perceptions of events, objects, or information that should have been impossible to obtain through normal sensory means.

Researchers define veridical perception as the ability to accurately observe and later report “details that should have been impossible to perceive from the position of the physical body, especially when the person was clinically unconscious or even blind from birth” (Ring & Cooper, Mindsight, Chapter on Corroborative Evidence). This phenomenon, also called apparently non-physical veridical perception (AVP), poses an insurmountable challenge to materialist explanations of consciousness.

The significance of veridical perception cannot be overstated: if consciousness can accurately perceive reality while the brain is clinically dead, then consciousness must be more than a mere product of brain activity.

The evidence for veridical perception comes from multiple categories of cases, each providing different levels of corroboration:

Visual Perception During Clinical Death: Numerous documented cases involve patients accurately describing details of their resuscitation procedures while their hearts were stopped, their EEGs showed no brain activity, and their eyes were closed or taped shut. As one researcher notes, these involve “Accurate reports (from outside the body) of the hospital room or accident location” providing “corroborating evidence” that challenges naturalism’s ability to explain “how could people give detailed descriptions of people and events during the time they were clinically dead (no heartbeat, no respiration)?” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Argument #1).

Perception by the Blind: Perhaps the most compelling evidence comes from people blind from birth who report visual perceptions during NDEs. Research documents cases where individuals who had never seen anything in their lives accurately described visual details of their surroundings, medical equipment, and people present during their medical crisis (Ring & Cooper, Mindsight). One woman blind from birth, Vicki, accurately described the hairstyle and clothing of medical personnel she had never met before her NDE.

Remote Perception: Some cases involve accurate perception of events occurring in distant locations during the NDE. Experiencers have accurately reported conversations and events happening in hospital waiting rooms, other parts of the building, or even in other cities while they were unconscious in operating rooms.

Perception of Unknown Information: Cases exist where experiencers gained knowledge they couldn’t have possessed previously, such as the existence of deceased relatives they had never been told about, or details about medical procedures they had no way of knowing.

Research Finding: Dr. Penny Sartori’s five-year study found that NDE patients gave more accurate descriptions of their resuscitation procedures than control patients who were resuscitated but didn’t have NDEs, lending “further support to the possibility of consciousness existing apart from the brain.”

The characteristics of veridical perception during NDEs differ markedly from normal sensory perception:

360-Degree Awareness: Many experiencers report being able to perceive in all directions simultaneously, describing it as “panoramic, 360 degrees, all around, like a sphere” (Ring & Cooper, Mindsight). This omnidirectional awareness is impossible with physical eyes but commonly reported during OBEs.

Enhanced Clarity: Despite being separated from their physical sensory organs, experiencers often report perception that is clearer and more detailed than normal vision. They describe seeing “every speck of dust” or “every single hair” with perfect clarity.

X-Ray Vision: Some report being able to see through solid objects, perceiving the internal structure of things or seeing objects hidden from normal view. One experiencer described seeing through a table to observe objects underneath, while another saw the internal anatomy of their own body.

Instantaneous Movement: Perception can shift instantly to different locations without traversing the intervening space. Experiencers report that simply thinking about a location or person results in immediate perception of that place or individual.

From a theological perspective, veridical perception provides powerful support for the biblical understanding of human nature. As researchers argue, “If consciousness can perceive verifiable information while the brain is clinically non-functional, then consciousness cannot be merely a product of the brain. It must be a separate entity (the soul)” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 7).

The biblical framework for understanding veridical perception can be found in passages that distinguish between physical and spiritual sight. Paul writes about “the eyes of your heart being enlightened” (Ephesians 1:18), suggesting a form of perception that transcends physical vision. The prophet Elisha’s servant was enabled to see spiritual realities normally invisible to physical eyes (2 Kings 6:17), demonstrating that perception can occur through non-physical means.

Scientific attempts to explain veridical perception have consistently failed. Various theories have been proposed and tested:

Reconstruction from Memory: Critics suggest that patients simply reconstruct events from prior knowledge or television medical dramas. However, this fails to explain how patients accurately describe unique details specific to their own resuscitation, details that differ from typical procedures and wouldn’t be known from general knowledge.

Residual Hearing: Some propose that patients retain hearing during clinical death and construct visual images from auditory input. This theory cannot explain how patients accurately describe visual details never mentioned verbally, such as the color of clothing, visual displays on medical equipment, or silent gestures made by medical staff.

Lucky Guesses: The suggestion that accurate perceptions result from fortunate guessing is statistically untenable given the specific, detailed, and accurate nature of many reports. When researcher Michael Sabom tested this hypothesis by asking cardiac patients without NDEs to guess what happened during their procedures, 80% made major errors, while NDE patients with veridical perceptions made none.

Subconscious Awareness: The proposal that some level of brain function continues during clinical death cannot explain cases where veridical perception occurred when EEG monitoring showed no brain activity whatsoever, or when perception involved remote locations.

The documented cases of veridical perception are numerous and well-attested:

The famous “dentures case” involved a comatose patient who, upon recovery, accurately described the nurse who had removed his dentures and the specific drawer where they were placed, despite being clinically dead with dilated pupils and no measurable brain activity at the time.

Pam Reynolds, during a surgical procedure that involved draining the blood from her brain and cooling her body to 60 degrees Fahrenheit, accurately described the unique surgical saw used to open her skull (comparing it to an electric toothbrush) and reported specific conversations among surgical staff, despite having clicking devices in her ears producing 100-decibel noise.

A young girl named Katie accurately drew a picture of the medical equipment used in her resuscitation, including details she couldn’t have seen from her position and had never encountered before.

The implications of veridical perception extend far beyond individual cases:

Validation of Spiritual Reality: Veridical perception provides empirical evidence for the existence of non-physical consciousness, supporting the biblical worldview that humans possess souls that can exist independently of their bodies.

Challenge to Materialism: These cases pose what researchers call an “insurmountable challenge” to the materialist view that consciousness is merely a brain product. No materialist theory has successfully explained how accurate perception can occur without functioning sensory organs or brain activity.

Support for Afterlife: If consciousness can function apart from the body temporarily, this supports the possibility that it could survive bodily death permanently, validating biblical promises of eternal life.

Confirmation of Biblical Anthropology: Veridical perception supports the biblical view of humans as composite beings of body and soul, rather than purely physical entities.

For Christians evaluating veridical perception claims, several considerations are important:

Documentation Quality: The strongest cases involve independent corroboration from medical staff, family members, or medical records. Single-witness accounts, while potentially genuine, carry less evidential weight.

Consistency with Scripture: While veridical perception itself doesn’t contradict biblical teaching, the spiritual messages sometimes associated with these perceptions must be evaluated against Scripture.

Humility About Mystery: While veridical perception provides evidence for consciousness beyond the brain, we should remain humble about exactly how this works. The mechanism by which a disembodied consciousness can “see” remains mysterious.

Avoiding Sensationalism: While veridical perception is remarkable, Christians should avoid treating NDEs as more authoritative than Scripture or using them as the primary basis for faith.

Materialism/Physicalism

Materialism, also called Physicalism, represents a worldview that has dominated much of modern science and philosophy. At its core, materialism asserts that physical matter is the only reality that exists—everything in the universe, including consciousness, thoughts, emotions, and spiritual experiences, can ultimately be reduced to interactions between physical particles and forces. According to this view, humans are essentially “meat computers,” complex biological machines with no immaterial soul or spirit.

The significance of understanding materialism for evaluating NDEs cannot be overstated. As researchers note, “The false conclusions of physicalist science that consciousness is manufactured by physiological processes occurring in the brain, that we are nothing more than ‘meat computers,’ automatons or zombies, that free will itself is a complete illusion, are vastly destructive as a predominant worldview” (Hagan, Science of Near-Death Experiences, Chapter on Science Beyond Physicalism).

Materialism makes several key claims about human nature and consciousness:

Brain Creates Mind: Materialists assert that consciousness is an emergent property of brain activity, similar to how wetness emerges from H2O molecules. When the brain dies, consciousness ceases to exist entirely. There is no soul that survives death, no afterlife, and no spiritual dimension to reality.

Deterministic Universe: In the materialist view, everything that happens is the inevitable result of prior physical causes. Free will is an illusion—our thoughts and decisions are simply the predetermined outcomes of electrochemical processes in our brains.

Reductionism: Complex phenomena can always be reduced to simpler physical components. Love is merely a combination of hormones and neural activity. Spiritual experiences are hallucinations or misfiring neurons. Beauty, meaning, and purpose are subjective human constructs with no objective reality.

Closed System: The universe is a closed system where every physical event is caused by a prior physical event. There is no room for divine intervention, miracles, or non-physical causation.

Critical Problem: Materialism faces what philosophers call “the hard problem of consciousness”—explaining why subjective experience exists at all. Why should there be something it feels like to be conscious if consciousness is merely brain activity?

The historical development of materialism traces back to ancient Greek philosophers like Democritus, who proposed that everything consists of atoms moving through void. However, modern materialism gained dominance during the Scientific Revolution and Enlightenment, when success in explaining natural phenomena through physical laws led many to conclude that everything could be explained this way.

The theological problems with materialism are profound. Scripture clearly teaches that humans consist of both material and immaterial aspects. Jesus stated, “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul” (Matthew 10:28), explicitly distinguishing between the physical body and the immaterial soul. The materialist denial of the soul contradicts fundamental Christian doctrine about human nature, the afterlife, and the possibility of relationship with God.

As theological scholars observe, there is significant resistance to this view even among some theologians: “It is so fashionable in some theological circles that British theologian Adrian Thatcher categorically states: ‘There appears to be a rare unanimity among biblical scholars that the biblical picture of the person is non-dualist, and that the Bible gives little or no support to the idea that a person is essentially a soul, or that the soul is separable from the body'” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, citing theological debates).

However, this claimed “unanimity” is strongly disputed. Conservative theologians point to extensive biblical evidence for the separation of body and soul, citing passages where consciousness continues after physical death, such as Jesus’s parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31) and Paul’s desire to be “away from the body and at home with the Lord” (2 Corinthians 5:8).

Near-death experiences pose insurmountable challenges to materialism:

Enhanced Mental Function During Brain Shutdown: NDEs involve “enhanced mental functions while their brains are severely compromised, if not completely shut down” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible). According to materialism, consciousness should fade as brain function decreases. Instead, NDErs report heightened awareness, clarity, and expanded consciousness precisely when their brains show minimal or no activity.

Veridical Perception: The ability to accurately perceive events while clinically dead with no brain activity contradicts materialism’s claim that perception requires functioning sensory organs and neural processing. As one researcher notes, “How are we even to understand the assertion that thoughts and brain states are really one and the same?” when NDEs demonstrate consciousness functioning independently of the brain (Carter, Science and the Near-Death Experience).

Transformative Lasting Effects: If NDEs were merely dying brain hallucinations, they shouldn’t produce consistent, profound, and lasting personality changes. Yet experiencers show measurable, permanent alterations in brain structure and function, suggesting something more than temporary chemical imbalances.

Blind Sight: People blind from birth reporting accurate visual perception during NDEs cannot be explained by materialism. Without ever having visual experience, their brains lack the neural structures necessary to construct visual hallucinations, yet they accurately describe visual details.

The scientific critique of materialism is growing stronger. Quantum physics has revealed that matter itself is far stranger than classical materialism assumed. As physicists note, “The classical idea of substance—self-sufficient, unchanging, with definite location, motion, and extension in space—has been replaced by the idea that physical reality is not made out of any material substance, but rather out of events and possibilities” (Carter, Science and the Near-Death Experience).

Leading scientists increasingly reject strict materialism. Astronomer V. A. Firsoff writes, “To assert there is only matter and no mind is the most illogical of propositions, quite apart from the findings of modern physics, which show that there is no matter in the traditional meaning of the term” (quoted in Carter). Even Wolfgang Pauli, a major contributor to quantum theory, concluded: “The only acceptable point of view appears to be the one that recognizes both sides of reality—the quantitative and the qualitative, the physical and the psychical—as compatible with each other.”

The philosophical problems with materialism are equally severe:

Self-Refutation: If our thoughts are merely brain chemistry, then the thought “materialism is true” is itself just brain chemistry with no necessary connection to truth. Materialism undermines the very reasoning used to defend it.

Inability to Explain Qualia: Materialism cannot explain why there is something it feels like to experience red, taste chocolate, or feel joy. Physical descriptions of wavelengths or neural activity don’t capture the subjective quality of experience.

The Binding Problem: How does unified consciousness emerge from billions of separate neurons? Materialism has no adequate explanation for how distributed brain activity becomes integrated subjective experience.

Abstract Thought: How can physical brain states be “about” abstract concepts like justice, infinity, or mathematics? The intentionality of consciousness—its ability to be about something beyond itself—defies materialist explanation.

For Christians, understanding materialism’s limitations is crucial for several reasons:

Defending the Faith: Many attacks on Christianity stem from materialist assumptions. Understanding materialism’s philosophical and evidential weaknesses helps believers respond to claims that science has disproven the soul or afterlife.

Interpreting NDEs: Recognizing materialism’s failure to explain NDEs helps Christians appreciate these experiences as potential glimpses of spiritual reality rather than dismissing them as brain malfunctions.

Pastoral Care: Understanding the debate helps ministers and counselors address those struggling with doubts about the afterlife or those who’ve had NDEs and seek to understand them.

Evangelism: NDEs provide evidence against materialism that can open doors for spiritual conversations with those who assume science has disproven spiritual reality.

The movement beyond materialism is gaining momentum. Researchers speak of “the emerging scientific view of consciousness as fundamental in the universe” which “incorporates the Oneness of all consciousness, and the importance of appreciating the connectedness of all elements of the universe” (Hagan, Science of Near-Death Experiences).

This shift toward post-materialist science doesn’t necessarily lead to Christian theism, but it opens the door for serious consideration of spiritual realities that materialism dogmatically denied. As philosopher of mind John Searle candidly admits, “Acceptance of the current views is motivated not so much by an independent conviction of their truth as by a terror of what are apparently the only alternatives” (quoted in Carter).

The collapse of materialism as an adequate explanation for consciousness and NDEs represents one of the most significant intellectual shifts of our time, with profound implications for how we understand human nature, death, and ultimate reality.

Substance Dualism

Substance Dualism represents the classical Christian understanding of human nature—that we are composite beings consisting of both a physical body and an immaterial soul or spirit. This view stands in direct opposition to materialism and provides the theological framework for understanding how consciousness can exist independently of the brain, as demonstrated in near-death experiences.

The essential claim of substance dualism is elegantly simple yet profound: humans are “creatures made out of a material body and a nonmaterial soul. The soul is sometimes referred to as spirit. Both body and soul are created by God and are distinct aspects of our personal makeup” (Sproul, quoted in Sabom, Light & Death). The soul is described as the “immaterial personal self” that animates the physical body.

Biblical support for substance dualism is extensive and explicit. Jesus himself distinguished between body and soul when He taught, “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell” (Matthew 10:28). This statement makes no sense unless the soul is something distinct from and separable from the body.

Paul’s writings repeatedly affirm the distinction between the physical and spiritual aspects of human nature. He speaks of being “away from the body and at home with the Lord” (2 Corinthians 5:8) and expresses uncertainty whether his vision of paradise occurred “in the body or out of the body” (2 Corinthians 12:2-3). These passages clearly indicate that Paul understood consciousness could exist apart from the physical body.

The theological implications of substance dualism are far-reaching:

Intermediate State: Between death and resurrection, the soul continues to exist consciously. This explains Jesus’s promise to the thief on the cross: “Today you will be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:43). The word “today” makes no sense if consciousness ceases at death until the future resurrection.

Image of God: Humans uniquely bear God’s image precisely because we possess an immaterial soul capable of reason, moral judgment, and relationship with God. This distinguishes us from animals and explains our unique dignity and value.

Moral Responsibility: If we are merely physical beings determined by brain chemistry, true moral responsibility is impossible. Dualism preserves genuine free will and accountability by locating the seat of choice in the immaterial soul.

Prayer and Worship: Communication with God, who is spirit (John 4:24), is possible because we too have a spiritual dimension. Prayer is not merely neural activity but genuine soul-to-Spirit communion.

Theological Insight: The traditional Christian position, defended by theologians from Augustine to Aquinas to contemporary evangelical scholars, maintains that at death “though the body dies, the soul of both the believer and unbeliever continues to live” until reunited with the resurrected body at Christ’s return.

Near-death experiences provide remarkable empirical support for substance dualism. Researchers argue that NDEs demonstrate precisely what dualism predicts: “If consciousness can perceive verifiable information while the brain is clinically non-functional, then consciousness cannot be merely a product of the brain. It must be a separate entity (the soul)” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 7).

The evidence from NDEs aligns perfectly with dualist expectations:

Continuity of Identity: During out-of-body experiences, people maintain their sense of self, memories, and personality despite being separated from their physical brain. This is exactly what dualism predicts—the soul carries personal identity.

Enhanced Consciousness: Rather than consciousness fading as the brain shuts down, NDErs report expanded awareness and clarity. This makes sense if consciousness resides in the soul and the brain actually limits or filters consciousness rather than producing it.

Veridical Perception: The ability to accurately perceive without functioning sensory organs demonstrates that perception can occur through non-physical means, just as dualism suggests the soul has its own faculties.

Meeting Deceased Persons: Encounters with those who have died, particularly when the experiencer didn’t know the person had died, suggests the continued existence of souls after bodily death.

The philosophical arguments for dualism are compelling:

The Unity of Consciousness: Despite having billions of neurons, we experience unified consciousness. Dualism explains this by positing a simple, uncomposed soul that unifies diverse brain activities into singular experience.

Personal Identity Through Time: Our bodies completely replace their atoms every seven years, yet we remain the same person. Dualism locates identity in the unchanging soul rather than the ever-changing body.

The Reality of the Mental: Mental properties (thoughts, feelings, intentions) have characteristics completely different from physical properties (mass, charge, spin). Thoughts can be true or false; physical objects cannot. This suggests two distinct types of reality.

Intentionality: Our thoughts can be about things—about Paris, about justice, about God. Physical states are never about anything; they simply are. This aboutness of consciousness points to its non-physical nature.

Modern physics increasingly supports dualist ideas. Quantum mechanics suggests consciousness plays a fundamental role in physical reality. As physicist Henry Stapp explains, “Contemporary physical theory allows, and its orthodox von Neumann form entails, an interactive dualism that is fully in accord with all the laws of physics” (quoted in Carter, Science and the Near-Death Experience).

The shift from classical to quantum physics has profound implications. In classical physics, there seemed to be no room for mind to influence matter. But quantum theory reveals that consciousness is necessary to collapse probability waves into actual events. This provides a scientific framework for understanding mind-body interaction.

Common objections to dualism often reflect misunderstandings:

“How can immaterial soul interact with material body?” This “interaction problem” assumes classical physics where only physical things can cause physical effects. But quantum physics shows that non-physical probability waves collapse into physical events through observation. If abstract mathematics can describe physical reality, why can’t immaterial soul interact with material body?

“Dualism is unscientific.” This confuses methodological naturalism (studying nature using natural methods) with philosophical naturalism (believing only nature exists). Science studies the physical but cannot pronounce on whether non-physical realities exist. Dualism is a metaphysical position, not a scientific hypothesis, though it makes predictions that science can test.

“Brain damage affects consciousness, proving the brain creates mind.” Dualism never denied that brain and mind interact intimately. The brain may be the instrument through which the soul operates in the physical world. A damaged violin produces poor music, but this doesn’t mean the violin creates the violinist.

“Evolution explains consciousness without souls.” Evolution might explain increasing brain complexity, but it cannot explain why there is something it feels like to be conscious. Why didn’t evolution produce philosophical zombies—beings that behave consciously but have no inner experience? The existence of consciousness itself points beyond purely physical processes.

Different forms of dualism offer various models:

Cartesian Dualism: Following Descartes, this sees soul and body as two completely distinct substances that interact through a specific brain region (Descartes suggested the pineal gland).

Thomistic Dualism: Following Aquinas, this sees the soul as the form of the body—distinct but naturally united with it. The soul can exist without the body but is incomplete without it, explaining the necessity of bodily resurrection.

Emergent Dualism: This suggests the soul emerges from brain complexity but then exists independently. This attempts to reconcile evolution with dualism but faces challenges explaining how emergence produces something ontologically distinct.

Holistic Dualism: This emphasizes the functional unity of body and soul while maintaining their distinction. Humans function as integrated wholes, though the soul can separate at death.

For pastoral care and practical Christian living, substance dualism provides crucial insights:

Death and Grief: Understanding that the soul survives death provides genuine comfort to the grieving. Deceased believers are not extinct but “away from the body and at home with the Lord.”

Personal Identity: In an age of identity confusion, dualism affirms that our true self is the soul created by God, not merely our physical appearance or brain states.

Mental Health: While acknowledging that brain chemistry affects mood and thought, dualism maintains that humans are more than their brain chemistry. This preserves dignity and hope for those struggling with mental illness.

Spiritual Disciplines: Prayer, meditation, and worship are not merely psychological exercises but genuine activities of the soul that can transform us from the inside out.

The future of dualism in intellectual discourse appears promising. As one researcher notes, “The emerging scientific view, far more powerful in its explanatory potential, relates to the notion of the brain as a reducing valve, or filter that limits primordial (infinite?) consciousness down to the minuscule trickle of the apparent here-and-now” (Hagan, Science of Near-Death Experiences).

This “filter theory” represents a modern version of dualism that takes seriously both neuroscience and spiritual experience. Rather than the brain producing consciousness, it channels and constrains the soul’s consciousness for earthly life. Death removes these constraints, explaining the expanded consciousness reported in NDEs.

Spiritual Discernment

Spiritual Discernment represents one of the most crucial skills for Christians evaluating near-death experiences and other spiritual phenomena. It is the God-given ability to distinguish between authentic divine experiences, human psychological phenomena, and deceptive spiritual counterfeits. In the context of NDEs, discernment becomes essential because not all spiritual experiences come from God, and even genuine experiences can be misinterpreted or contaminated with error.

The biblical mandate for spiritual discernment is clear and uncompromising. The apostle John commands, “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God” (1 John 4:1). This isn’t optional advice but a necessary practice for spiritual safety. Paul similarly warns that “Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light” (2 Corinthians 11:14), indicating that deceptive spiritual experiences can appear beautiful, loving, and seemingly divine.

In the context of NDEs, researchers emphasize that “because NDEs are powerful spiritual experiences, they are a prime target for demonic ‘hijacking'” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 8). This doesn’t mean all NDEs are deceptive, but it does mean each must be carefully evaluated against biblical standards.

The stakes of proper spiritual discernment could not be higher—accepting false spiritual messages can lead people away from salvation in Christ, while rejecting genuine divine experiences might cause us to miss what God is revealing.

The foundation of all spiritual discernment is Scripture. As researchers note, the Bible must be “the absolute, non-negotiable standard for truth” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 9). Any spiritual experience, no matter how powerful or transformative, must align with biblical revelation. God will not contradict in experience what He has revealed in His Word.

Essential Framework: Three critical questions for discernment: (1) What does it teach about Jesus? (2) What is the message about salvation? (3) What is the long-term fruit? These questions help identify whether an experience aligns with biblical truth or promotes deception.

The primary areas requiring discernment in NDEs include:

The Identity of Spiritual Beings: Not every being of light is Christ, and not every spiritual entity is an angel of God. The test is found in 1 John 4:2-3: “Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God.”

Messages About Salvation: Any message suggesting salvation through means other than faith in Christ must be rejected. As Paul warns, “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse” (Galatians 1:8).

Teachings About the Afterlife: Messages promoting universalism (all are saved), reincarnation, or the absence of judgment contradict clear biblical teaching and must be recognized as deceptive, regardless of how comforting they might seem.

New Revelations: Claims of receiving new spiritual truths that add to or contradict Scripture should raise immediate red flags. The canon of Scripture is closed; God’s revelation is complete in His Word.

Common deceptive messages in NDEs that fail the discernment test include:

Universalism: The message that “all paths lead to God” or “everyone goes to heaven” directly contradicts Jesus’s statement, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6). Researchers note this as one of the most common deceptive messages, citing Eben Alexander’s experience as an example of “a message lacking the need for Christ” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 8).

Works-Based Salvation: Some NDEs suggest people earn heaven through good deeds or spiritual development. This contradicts Ephesians 2:8-9: “For it is by grace you have been saved, through faith—and this is not from yourselves, it is the gift of God—not by works, so that no one can boast.”

Denial of Hell: Experiences claiming hell doesn’t exist or is only temporary contradict Jesus’s clear teachings about eternal punishment (Matthew 25:46, Mark 9:48).

Pre-Existence of Souls: Some experiencers claim to learn about pre-mortal existence or choosing their life circumstances before birth. These ideas, often found in works like Betty Eadie’s Embraced by the Light, have no biblical support and contradict the biblical teaching that God creates each soul.

The process of spiritual discernment involves several practical steps:

Prayer for Wisdom: James 1:5 promises that God gives wisdom generously to those who ask. Before evaluating any spiritual experience, seek God’s guidance through prayer.

Biblical Knowledge: Effective discernment requires knowing Scripture well. As Hebrews 5:14 notes, “solid food is for the mature, who by constant use have trained themselves to distinguish good from evil.”

Community Confirmation: Proverbs 11:14 teaches that “in the multitude of counselors there is safety.” Discuss spiritual experiences with mature believers, pastors, and those gifted in discernment.

Fruit Inspection: Jesus taught, “By their fruit you will recognize them” (Matthew 7:16). Evaluate the long-term effects of the experience. Does it produce humility or pride? Love for God’s Word or disregard for it? Unity with believers or isolation from the church?

Time and Testing: Don’t rush to judgment. Some experiences take time to fully understand. Continue testing against Scripture and observing fruit over months or years.

It’s crucial to distinguish between different types of problems in NDE accounts:

Human Interpretation Errors: A person trying to describe the indescribable might use familiar imagery that isn’t perfectly accurate. Someone might describe angels with wings because that’s their mental image, even if the beings didn’t actually have wings. These interpretation errors don’t necessarily invalidate the core experience.

Memory Distortion: Over time, memories can be influenced by reading other accounts, cultural expectations, or personal beliefs. This natural psychological process doesn’t mean the original experience was false.

Demonic Deception: This involves corruption of the core theological message. When an experience promotes false doctrine about Christ, salvation, or essential biblical truths, it reveals spiritual deception regardless of how genuine it seems.

Psychological Phenomena: Some experiences might be natural psychological events rather than spiritual encounters. These aren’t necessarily deceptive but shouldn’t be interpreted as divine revelations.

Specific discernment challenges arise with NDEs:

Overwhelming Emotions: The powerful feelings of love and acceptance in NDEs can override critical thinking. Remember that emotions, while important, are not reliable guides to truth. Even deceptive experiences can produce strong positive emotions.

Apparent Verification: When an NDE includes veridical perception or accurate predictions, it’s tempting to accept everything about the experience as true. However, remember that “true ‘signs and wonders’ can also be used by Satan to accomplish his goals” (Sabom, Light & Death). Verify the message, not just the miracles.

Personal Testimony: When someone we trust has an NDE, we might accept it uncritically. But even sincere, godly people can be deceived or misinterpret experiences. Test the message, not just the messenger.

Cultural Pressure: In our tolerant age, suggesting someone’s spiritual experience might be deceptive seems judgmental. But love requires truth. It’s more loving to help someone recognize deception than to affirm a false message that could lead them astray.

Signs of authentic divine experiences in NDEs include:

Christ-Centeredness: Genuine experiences point to Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, not merely as a good teacher or one way among many.

Biblical Alignment: The message confirms rather than contradicts biblical teaching about God, salvation, judgment, and eternity.

Spiritual Fruit: The experience produces increased love for God, His Word, and His people. It leads to humility, service, and holiness rather than pride or independence.

Conviction of Sin: Rather than dismissing sin as unimportant, authentic experiences often include conviction about sin and gratitude for forgiveness through Christ.

Church Unity: True experiences from God draw people toward fellowship with other believers rather than creating division or spiritual elitism.

The gift of discernment itself is a spiritual gift (1 Corinthians 12:10) that some believers possess in greater measure. Those with this gift often sense spiritual realities others miss and can quickly identify deception. However, all believers are called to exercise discernment and grow in this ability.

Common mistakes in spiritual discernment include:

All-or-Nothing Thinking: Assuming an experience must be entirely divine or entirely deceptive. Reality is often more complex, with genuine elements mixed with human interpretation or even some deception.

Experiential Override: Allowing powerful experiences to override clear biblical teaching. No matter how real or transformative an experience seems, Scripture remains the ultimate authority.

Fear-Based Rejection: Dismissing all spiritual experiences out of fear of deception. This can cause us to miss what God might be doing. The goal is discernment, not blanket rejection.

Presumptuous Acceptance: Assuming that because someone is a Christian or the experience included Christian imagery, it must be from God. Even believers can be deceived, and Satan can use Christian symbols.

The Void

The Void represents one of the most terrifying and theologically significant types of near-death experience. Unlike the radiant, love-filled encounters that characterize most NDEs, experiences of the Void involve absolute emptiness, isolation, and meaninglessness. These distressing NDEs, though less common than positive ones, provide sobering confirmation of biblical warnings about separation from God and the reality of spiritual darkness.

Researchers describe the Void as “experiences of absolute emptiness, isolation, and meaninglessness” that represent “the ultimate separation from God, who is the source of all love, light, and meaning” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 11). Those who experience the Void often describe it as worse than traditional depictions of hell—not because of active torment, but because of the complete absence of anything good, meaningful, or relational.

The phenomenology of Void experiences shares consistent characteristics across accounts:

Absolute Darkness: Not merely the absence of light, but a thick, oppressive darkness that seems to have substance. Experiencers describe it as a darkness that can be felt, that presses in from all sides, completely different from simply being in a dark room.

Total Isolation: A crushing sense of being utterly alone, cut off not just from other beings but from the very possibility of connection. Some describe knowing with certainty that no one else exists, has ever existed, or will ever exist—an eternal, solitary confinement of consciousness.

Absence of Time: The Void exists outside of time as we understand it. Experiencers report that moments feel like eternities, with no sense of progression or hope that the experience will ever end. This timelessness adds to the horror, as there’s no reference point for how long one has been there or might remain.

Loss of Identity: Some report beginning to lose their sense of self, as if dissolving into the nothingness. Without relationships or reference points, the boundaries of personal identity begin to blur and fade.

Overwhelming Despair: The emotional component involves despair beyond anything experienced in earthly life—a complete absence of hope, purpose, or meaning. Many describe it as experiencing the opposite of love, not hate but simply the total absence of love.

Theological Insight: The Void may represent what theologians call “poena damni”—the punishment of loss, considered the greatest suffering of hell. It’s the experience of being separated from God, the source of all good, resulting in the absence of everything that makes existence bearable.

From a biblical perspective, the Void aligns with scriptural descriptions of spiritual darkness and separation from God. Jesus spoke of “outer darkness” where there would be “weeping and gnashing of teeth” (Matthew 8:12, 22:13, 25:30). This “outer darkness” suggests not just absence of light but existence outside the realm of God’s presence.

The theological significance of the Void cannot be overstated. It provides experiential confirmation of what happens when creatures designed for relationship with God are severed from that relationship. As C.S. Lewis wrote, “The gates of hell are locked from the inside”—those in the Void are there because they have chosen separation from God, and that separation is precisely what they experience.

Types of Void experiences vary in their specific features:

The Featureless Void: Pure nothingness—no landscape, no entities, no sensations except the awareness of existing in emptiness. Experiencers describe floating or existing in an infinite expanse of nothing.

The Oppressive Void: While still empty, this version includes a sense of weight or pressure, as if the darkness itself is crushing. Some describe feeling surrounded by malevolent emptiness that seems actively hostile.

The Dissolving Void: Experiencers report feeling themselves beginning to dissolve or fragment, losing cohesion as conscious beings. This type often produces the most terror, as it threatens the very core of existence.

The Realm of Confused Souls: Some describe the Void as populated by other consciousnesses, but ones that cannot truly connect or communicate—millions of isolated beings, each trapped in their own emptiness, aware of others but unable to reach them.

The causes and meanings of Void experiences are debated among researchers:

Spiritual Interpretation: Many see the Void as a genuine glimpse of hell or the state of separation from God. It serves as a warning about the reality of spiritual darkness and the consequences of rejecting God.

Psychological Interpretation: Some suggest the Void represents the deepest fears of the human psyche—abandonment, meaninglessness, annihilation. From this view, it’s a projection of psychological states rather than perception of spiritual reality.

Transitional State: Others propose the Void might be a transitional realm, a spiritual “waiting room” that souls pass through. Some experiencers report that calling out to God or Jesus from the Void results in immediate rescue.

Purification Process: Some interpret the Void as a purifying experience, stripping away earthly attachments and ego to prepare the soul for higher spiritual realities.

The transformative effects of Void experiences are profound and often different from positive NDEs:

Spiritual Urgency: Many return with an urgent message about the reality of spiritual darkness and the necessity of choosing God. They become evangelistic, warning others about what awaits those who reject divine love.

Gratitude for Existence: Having experienced nothingness, experiencers often develop profound gratitude for even the simplest aspects of existence—light, sound, the presence of others, the ability to feel anything at all.

Fear and Trauma: Unlike positive NDEs that remove fear of death, Void experiences can increase it. Some experiencers struggle with PTSD-like symptoms, terrified of returning to that state.

Spiritual Seeking: Many who weren’t religious before their Void experience become intense spiritual seekers, desperate to ensure they never return to that state. This often leads to Christian conversion or renewed faith.

Biblical parallels to the Void are numerous and striking:

**The Rich Man’s Torment:** In Jesus’s parable (Luke 16:19-31), the rich man in Hades experiences separation—he can see Abraham and Lazarus but cannot reach them. This isolation despite awareness parallels some Void experiences.

**Jude’s Description:** Jude 1:13 speaks of “wandering stars, for whom blackest darkness has been reserved forever.” This image of eternal darkness and aimless wandering captures the essence of the Void.

**Separation from Christ:** Paul’s statement that those without Christ are “without hope and without God in the world” (Ephesians 2:12) describes the existential reality that the Void represents in ultimate form.

The rescue from the Void reported by some experiencers deserves special attention. Many accounts describe that calling out to Jesus or God from within the Void results in immediate deliverance. A light appears in the darkness, or a hand reaches down to pull them out. This aligns with biblical promises like, “Everyone who calls on the name of the Lord will be saved” (Romans 10:13).

One famous account involves Howard Storm, an atheist art professor who found himself in a hellish void during his NDE. When he remembered and called out a childhood prayer to Jesus, he was immediately rescued and brought into the light. His experience led to complete life transformation and eventual ordination as a minister.

The theological implications of Void experiences challenge both universalist and annihilationist views:

Against Universalism: The Void demonstrates that not all souls automatically enter paradise. The stark reality of spiritual darkness experienced by some contradicts claims that all paths lead to God.

Against Annihilationism: The conscious suffering in the Void contradicts the idea that the unsaved simply cease to exist. Consciousness continues, but in a state of separation from all that makes existence meaningful.

Supporting Traditional View: The Void aligns with the traditional Christian understanding of hell as primarily separation from God, with suffering resulting from that separation rather than from arbitrary torture.

For pastoral care, understanding Void experiences is crucial:

For Those Who’ve Experienced It: They need assurance of God’s love and accessibility. Many fear they’re irredeemably damned. They need to understand that their return from the Void may be God’s mercy giving them opportunity for redemption.

For Those Fearing It: The appropriate response to fear of the Void is not denial but turning to Christ. The Void represents existence without God—the solution is ensuring relationship with God through Christ.

For Evangelism: Void experiences provide powerful testimony to the reality of spiritual darkness and the necessity of salvation. They can break through the complacency of those who assume all afterlife experiences are pleasant.

The Void stands as perhaps the most sobering element of NDE research, confirming that consciousness after death is not automatically blissful and that our spiritual choices have eternal consequences.

The mystery of why some experience the Void while others experience paradise remains partly unresolved. While some who experience the Void are clearly rebellious against God, others seem to be ordinary people, even some who consider themselves Christians. This mystery should inspire humility and urgency in spiritual matters.

Some researchers suggest the Void might serve different purposes for different people:

Warning: For some, it’s a merciful warning, allowing them to return and change their spiritual trajectory.

Choice Confirmation: For others, it might confirm their deep choice to live without God, experiencing the logical outcome of that choice.

Purification: Some Catholic and Orthodox theologians see parallels with purgatorial purification, though this remains controversial among Protestants.

Spiritual Warfare: Some experiences might represent spiritual attack, with forces of darkness attempting to claim souls not rightfully theirs.

Ineffability

Ineffability refers to the indescribable nature of near-death experiences—the fundamental inability of human language to adequately capture or convey what experiencers encounter in the transcendent realm. This characteristic, identified as one of the primary features of NDEs from the earliest research, points to the otherworldly nature of these experiences and suggests encounters with realities that transcend normal human comprehension.

Raymond Moody identified ineffability as the first of his eleven key themes, noting that “People consistently stated that they could not find adequate words to describe what they had experienced. It had felt like they had entered a different and higher dimension. As a result, ordinary language and words were insufficient to convey what they wanted to express” (Parnia, Lucid Dying, Chapter on Moody’s Research).

The challenge of ineffability goes beyond simple vocabulary limitations. Experiencers report that earthly language is fundamentally inadequate because it was developed to describe physical, temporal experiences, while NDEs involve spiritual, eternal realities. It’s not that better words would help—it’s that human language itself is categorically insufficient for the task.

From a biblical perspective, ineffability has strong precedent. When Paul described his journey to the third heaven, he reported hearing “inexpressible things, things that no one is permitted to tell” (2 Corinthians 12:4). The Greek word used here, “arrhetos,” means “unutterable” or “not to be uttered,” suggesting both inability and impropriety in attempting to describe heavenly realities in human terms.

Similarly, John’s attempts to describe his visions in Revelation resort to constant use of “like” or “as”—”like jasper,” “like a sea of glass,” “as loud as thunder.” These similes indicate he’s straining language to its limits, trying to describe the indescribable by comparing it to the closest earthly approximations.

The specific aspects of NDEs that prove most ineffable include:

Colors Beyond the Spectrum: Many experiencers report seeing colors that don’t exist on earth, colors more vivid and alive than anything in physical reality. They struggle to describe these colors because human language only has words for colors within our visible spectrum.

Simultaneous Consciousness: The ability to perceive multiple things simultaneously, to know all aspects of something instantly, or to experience past, present, and future as a unified whole defies linear description. Language, which is sequential, cannot capture simultaneous omnidirectional awareness.

The Quality of Love: While “love” is a familiar word, experiencers consistently say the love encountered in NDEs is qualitatively different from earthly love—infinitely more intense, pure, and unconditional. They resort to phrases like “liquid love” or “being inside love itself,” recognizing these descriptions are inadequate.

Telepathic Communication: The direct mind-to-mind or soul-to-soul communication in NDEs conveys not just thoughts but complete understanding, including emotional context, history, and implications. Experiencers describe receiving vast amounts of information instantaneously that would take hours or years to express in words.

The Nature of Light: The light encountered in NDEs is consistently described as unlike any earthly light—brilliant beyond description yet not harsh, seeming to have personality and consciousness, radiating love and knowledge. Physical descriptions of luminosity fail to capture its spiritual qualities.

Key Understanding: Ineffability is not a weakness of NDE accounts but evidence of their authenticity. If experiencers could easily describe their experiences in familiar terms, it would suggest they hadn’t truly encountered transcendent realities but only earthly phenomena.

The struggle with ineffability manifests in various ways:

Linguistic Stretching: Experiencers create new word combinations or use familiar words in unusual ways—”loud silence,” “dark light,” “ancient child”—trying to convey paradoxical realities that transcend normal categories.

Metaphorical Approximation: Heavy reliance on metaphor and simile reflects attempts to bridge the gap between transcendent experience and earthly understanding. An experiencer might say the being of light was “like being embraced by the sun, if the sun were made of love.”

Emotional Overflow: Many experiencers become emotional when trying to describe their NDEs, weeping not from sadness but from the frustration of being unable to share the fullness of what they experienced. The gap between experience and expression causes genuine distress.

Selective Silence: Some experiencers choose not to share certain aspects of their experiences, not from secretiveness but from recognizing the futility of trying to express the inexpressible. Like Paul’s “things not permitted to tell,” some elements remain private.

The theological implications of ineffability are significant:

Divine Transcendence: Ineffability confirms that God and spiritual realities truly transcend human comprehension. As Isaiah 55:9 states, “As the heavens are higher than the earth, so are my ways higher than your ways and my thoughts than your thoughts.”

Limitations of Natural Theology: While we can know some things about God through creation and reason, ineffability reminds us that full understanding requires divine revelation and ultimately direct experience.

Mystery and Humility: The ineffable nature of NDEs should inspire humility about dogmatic claims regarding details of the afterlife. While Scripture gives us reliable truth, there remain mysteries that transcend human understanding.

Anticipation of Glory: For believers, ineffability increases anticipation of heaven. If NDEs, which many consider mere glimpses of eternal reality, are indescribable, how much more glorious must be the full experience of God’s presence?

Cultural and linguistic factors affect ineffability:

Cultural Frameworks: People from different cultures may use different metaphors to describe similar ineffable experiences. A Western experiencer might describe the light as “brighter than the sun,” while someone from a pre-industrial culture might use different comparisons.

Religious Vocabulary: Those with religious backgrounds often have richer vocabularies for spiritual experiences—terms like “glory,” “presence,” “transcendent,” “immanence.” Yet even these specialized terms prove inadequate for NDE descriptions.

Artistic Expression: Some experiencers turn to art, music, or poetry to express what words cannot. These alternative forms of expression sometimes capture aspects of the experience that prose cannot convey.

Shared Understanding: Interestingly, NDE experiencers often report that other experiencers understand their inadequate descriptions better than those who haven’t had NDEs, suggesting a shared experiential knowledge that transcends verbal communication.

The challenge of ineffability for researchers includes:

Data Collection: How do researchers study experiences that subjects cannot fully describe? This requires sensitivity to non-verbal communication, attention to metaphors, and acceptance of incomplete data.

Categorization: Creating typologies of NDEs is complicated when experiencers cannot precisely describe what they encountered. Researchers must work with approximations and recognize the limitations of their categories.

Cross-Cultural Comparison: Determining whether NDEs are universal requires comparing accounts that are already filtered through inadequate language and cultural interpretation.

Verification: How can claims be verified when the experiencer cannot fully articulate what they experienced? This is particularly challenging for the transcendent aspects of NDEs.

Practical implications of ineffability for ministry and counseling:

Pastoral Patience: Ministers and counselors should be patient with experiencers who struggle to articulate their NDEs. The difficulty in expression doesn’t indicate confusion or deception but reflects the genuine challenge of ineffability.

Avoiding Reductionism: Don’t try to force NDE accounts into neat theological categories. The ineffable nature of these experiences means they may not fit perfectly into systematic theological frameworks.

Validation Without Full Understanding: It’s possible to validate an experiencer’s NDE without fully understanding it. Acknowledging the reality and significance of their experience doesn’t require complete comprehension.

Focus on Transformation: Since the experience itself may be ineffable, focus on the observable fruits and life changes that result. These concrete outcomes are more easily discussed and evaluated.

The relationship between ineffability and revelation deserves special attention. While NDEs are ineffable, Scripture manages to convey eternal truths in human language. This suggests several possibilities:

Divine Accommodation: God accommodates His revelation to human limitations, expressing infinite truths in finite language. Scripture gives us what we need to know, even if it cannot exhaust the fullness of divine reality.

Progressive Revelation: Our understanding of spiritual realities may be progressive, with earthly life providing elementary education and eternity offering advanced comprehension.

Experiential Knowledge: Some truths may be meant to be experienced rather than described. The ineffability of NDEs might point to realities we’ll fully understand only through direct experience in eternity.

Protective Limitation: Perhaps some realities remain ineffable for our protection. Full knowledge of eternal glories might make earthly life unbearable, while complete understanding of judgment might overwhelm us with terror.

The evidential value of ineffability is paradoxical but significant:

Authenticity Marker: The struggle with ineffability suggests genuine encounter with transcendent reality. If experiencers could easily describe their NDEs in familiar terms, it might indicate fabrication or hallucination based on earthly expectations.

Consistency Amid Ineffability: Despite the challenge of description, NDE accounts show remarkable consistency in what they attempt to express. This suggests common encounters with the same ineffable realities.

Transformative Despite Ineffability: Even though experiencers cannot fully describe their NDEs, the experiences produce consistent, profound life changes. This suggests real encounter with transformative truth, even if that truth cannot be fully articulated.

Ineffability ultimately points us toward the mystery and majesty of God, reminding us that eternal realities far exceed our current comprehension and that the best is yet to come for those who trust in Christ.

Bibliography

Atwater, P. M. H. The Big Book of Near-Death Experiences: The Ultimate Guide to the NDE and Its Aftereffects. Charlottesville: Hampton Roads Publishing, 2021.

Carter, Chris. Science and the Near-Death Experience: How Consciousness Survives Death. Rochester: Inner Traditions, 2010.

Hagan, John C., III, ed. The Science of Near-Death Experiences. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2017.

Miller, J. Steve. Is Christianity Compatible With Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences? The Surprising Presence of Jesus, Scarcity of Anti-Christian Elements, And Compatibility with Historic Christian Teachings. Kindle Edition, 2019.

Miller, J. Steve. Near-Death Experiences as Evidence for the Existence of God and Heaven: A Brief Introduction in Plain Language. Acworth: Wisdom Creek Press, 2015.

Parnia, Sam. Lucid Dying: The New Science Revolutionizing How We Understand Life and Death. New York: Hachette Books, 2024.

Ring, Kenneth, and Sharon Cooper. Mindsight: Near-Death and Out-of-Body Experiences in the Blind. 2nd ed. Bloomington: iUniverse, 2008.

Sabom, Michael. Light & Death: One Doctor’s Fascinating Account of Near-Death Experiences. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998.

A Catholic Understanding of the Near Death Experience. Revised Edition. Catholic Press, 2020.

Chapter 12: Appendix A – A Glossary of NDE Terms for the Everyday Reader