Chapter 07: More Than Just a Brain: How NDEs Support the Existence of the Soul (Substance Dualism)

Have you ever wondered what makes you… you? When you look in the mirror, you see your physical body—your face, your eyes, your smile. But is that all you are? Or is there something more, something deeper, something that exists beyond the neurons firing in your brain? This question has captivated humanity for thousands of years, and today, through the remarkable phenomenon of near-death experiences, we’re finding powerful evidence that points to an astonishing truth: you are more than just your brain.

In this chapter, we’re going to explore one of the most profound questions in all of human existence: Do we have a soul that can exist independently of our physical body? The answer to this question changes everything about how we understand life, death, and what it means to be human. And as we’ll discover, near-death experiences—particularly those with verified, accurate observations made while the brain was clinically non-functional—provide some of the strongest scientific evidence we have for the reality of the human soul.

The Great Debate: Two Views of Human Nature

Before we dive into the remarkable evidence from NDEs, we need to understand the two competing views about what makes us human. These two perspectives have been debated by philosophers, scientists, and theologians for centuries, and they lead to vastly different conclusions about our ultimate destiny.

The Materialist View: We Are Only Our Brains

Materialism is the belief that everything in existence, including human consciousness, can be explained purely in terms of physical matter and processes. According to this view, you are nothing more than your physical body, and your consciousness—your thoughts, feelings, memories, and sense of self—is simply a product of electrical and chemical activity in your brain.

Think of it this way: Materialists often compare the brain to a computer. Just as a computer processes information through electrical circuits and produces output on a screen, they argue that your brain processes sensory input and produces consciousness as its output. In this view, consciousness is like the software running on the hardware of your brain. When the hardware fails—when you die—the software simply ceases to exist. There’s no soul, no afterlife, no continuation of consciousness. Death is the absolute end.

As neuroscientist Richard Restak, author of The Brain, boldly declared: “There is no ‘seat of the mind’ and the entire concept of mind or soul is a philosophical fallacy, nothing more than a literary device.” He even claimed to have tried to find the soul using a sophisticated brain imaging machine called a PET scanner. When he couldn’t detect it with his machine, he concluded it must not exist—as if the soul, if it exists, would show up on a medical scan like a broken bone on an X-ray!

This materialist view has become increasingly dominant in modern science and medicine. As Dr. Pim van Lommel observed in his groundbreaking research: “The materialist approach, which is based on the premise that consciousness is a product or effect of brain function, is taught at many medical schools in the Western world. The approach is generally not made explicit and simply taken for granted without any kind of debate. Not surprisingly then, nearly all Western doctors believe that consciousness is the result of brain function.”

The philosopher Daniel Dennett, one of materialism’s most vocal champions, goes even further. He argues that consciousness itself is merely an illusion—a trick our brains play on us. In his view, we’re essentially biological robots, and our sense of having free will or making conscious choices is nothing but a persistent delusion. Everything we do, think, and feel is simply the inevitable result of neurons firing in predetermined patterns.

But here’s the critical problem with materialism: If consciousness is merely a product of brain activity, then how can people have clear, lucid, verifiable experiences when their brains show no activity at all?

The Dualist View: We Are Body AND Soul

Substance dualism presents a radically different understanding of human nature. This view, which has been the dominant perspective throughout most of human history and remains central to Christian theology, holds that we are composed of two distinct but united substances: a physical body and an immaterial soul or spirit.

To understand this better, let me share a helpful analogy. Imagine a car and its driver. The car is a remarkable machine—it has an engine, wheels, steering system, and all sorts of complex mechanical parts. But the car doesn’t drive itself. It needs a driver—someone who gets in, turns the key, and directs where the car goes. The driver can exist without the car, and when the driver gets out, he or she doesn’t cease to exist just because they’re no longer in the vehicle.

In this analogy, your body (including your brain) is like the car—it’s the physical vehicle you use to interact with the material world. Your soul is like the driver—it’s the real “you” that inhabits and directs your body. Your brain doesn’t create your consciousness any more than a car creates its driver. Instead, your brain is the incredibly sophisticated instrument through which your soul interfaces with the physical world.

As Nobel Prize-winning neuroscientist Sir John Eccles powerfully stated: “I maintain that the human mystery is incredibly demeaned by scientific reductionism, with its claim in promissory materialism to account eventually for all of the spiritual world in terms of patterns of neuronal activity. This belief must be classed as a superstition…. We have to recognize that we are spiritual beings with souls existing in a spiritual world as well as material beings with bodies and brains existing in a material world.”

Eccles, along with philosopher Karl Popper, developed this understanding further. According to Eccles, the brain functions as “an instrument that provides the conscious self or person with the lines of communication from and to the external world.” He explained that the brain “does this by receiving information through the immense sensory system of the millions of nerve fibres that fire impulses to the brain, where it is processed into coded patterns of information that we read out from moment to moment in deriving all our experiences—our perceptions, thoughts, ideas, and memories.”

This dualist perspective has ancient roots. The great philosopher René Descartes (1596-1650), often called the father of modern Western philosophy, articulated a clear distinction between mind and body. As Robin Brace explains: “Dualism is the belief that the brain is a physical component; the mind itself appears to belong to the metaphysical/spiritual realm.” Even earlier, the Greek philosophers Plato and Aristotle “insisted (though for somewhat different reasons), that people’s intelligence (a faculty of the mind or soul) could not be wholly identified with, or explained, in terms of their physical body.”

The Biblical Foundation for the Soul

Before we examine the evidence from NDEs, it’s crucial to understand what the Bible teaches about the nature of the soul and its relationship to the body. Scripture is remarkably clear on this matter, providing numerous passages that explicitly describe the soul as distinct from and able to separate from the physical body.

Consider the words of Jesus himself in Matthew 10:28: “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul. Rather, be afraid of the One who can destroy both soul and body in hell.” This statement makes no sense unless the soul is something distinct from the body. If we were merely physical beings, killing the body would kill everything. But Jesus explicitly states that those who kill the body cannot kill the soul.

The Apostle Paul provides even more explicit teaching on this matter. In 2 Corinthians 5:6-8, he writes: “Therefore we are always confident and know that as long as we are at home in the body we are away from the Lord. For we live by faith, not by sight. We are confident, I say, and would prefer to be away from the body and at home with the Lord.” How could Paul speak of being “away from the body” if the soul and body are inseparable?

Perhaps most remarkably, Paul describes what appears to be his own near-death or out-of-body experience in 2 Corinthians 12:2-4: “I know a man in Christ who fourteen years ago was caught up to the third heaven. Whether it was in the body or out of the body I do not know—God knows. And I know that this man—whether in the body or apart from the body I do not know, but God knows—was caught up to paradise and heard inexpressible things, things that no one is permitted to tell.”

Notice that Paul explicitly considers “out of the body” as a real possibility. If he believed that consciousness was inseparable from the physical body, why would he even mention this as an option? Many scholars believe Paul was referring to his own experience, possibly connected to his stoning in Lystra (Acts 14:19-20) when he was left for dead.

The Old Testament also affirms the distinction between body and soul. Ecclesiastes 12:7 describes what happens at death: “The dust returns to the ground it came from, and the spirit returns to God who gave it.” This verse presents death not as the cessation of existence, but as a separation—the body returns to dust while the spirit returns to God.

We see this understanding demonstrated dramatically in the Gospel accounts. When Jesus raised Jairus’s daughter from the dead, Luke records: “Her spirit returned, and at once she stood up” (Luke 8:55). Her spirit had departed at death and returned when Jesus called her back to life. Similarly, when Jesus was dying on the cross, He promised the repentant thief: “Truly I tell you, today you will be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:43). How could the thief be with Jesus in paradise that very day if consciousness ceased at death? The thief’s body remained on earth, but his spirit went to be with the Lord.

As theologian Charles Hodge explains in his Systematic Theology: “The soul and body are distinct substances… The soul can exist and act without the body.” This has been the consistent teaching of Christian theology throughout the centuries. The Westminster Confession of Faith states it clearly: “The bodies of men, after death, return to dust…but their souls, which neither die nor sleep, having an immortal subsistence, immediately return to God who gave them.”

The Challenge to Materialism: When the “Computer” Is Off but Consciousness Continues

Now we come to the heart of the matter. If materialism is correct—if consciousness is nothing more than a product of brain activity—then we should never, under any circumstances, find evidence of conscious experience when the brain is not functioning. It would be like expecting a computer to run programs when it’s unplugged from the wall. Impossible, right?

Yet this is exactly what we find in thousands of documented near-death experiences. People who have been clinically dead—with no heartbeat, no breathing, and no detectable brain activity—report the most vivid, clear, and transformative conscious experiences of their lives. Even more remarkably, many of these experiences include veridical perceptions—accurate observations of events that occurred while they were clinically dead, observations they could not possibly have made if consciousness were confined to a non-functioning brain.

Dr. Pim van Lommel, the renowned cardiologist who conducted one of the most rigorous studies of NDEs in cardiac arrest patients, puts it this way: “When the heart stops beating, blood flow stops within a second. Then, 6.5 seconds later, EEG activity starts to change due to the shortage of oxygen. After 15 seconds there is a straight, flat line and the electrical activity in the cerebral cortex has disappeared completely. We cannot measure the activity in the brain stem, but testing of the brain stem reflexes such as the pupil response and swallowing reflex shows that all brain stem activity has also ceased. Moreover, the respiratory center, which is located close to the brain stem, stops functioning. If the cardiac arrest continues for longer than 37 seconds, the body temperature will decrease.”

In this state of clinical death, according to everything we know about brain function, consciousness should be impossible. As Dr. van Lommel explains: “According to our current medical and scientific concepts it seems impossible to explain all aspects of the subjective experiences as reported by patients with an NDE during a transient functional loss of the cortex and the brain stem.”

Yet during this time when the brain shows no activity whatsoever, many patients report enhanced consciousness, clearer thinking than normal, and accurate perceptions of events happening around them and even at distant locations.

The Power of Veridical Perception: Seeing the Impossible

The term “veridical perception” refers to accurate observations made during an NDE that can be independently verified. These aren’t vague impressions or lucky guesses—they’re specific, detailed, accurate observations of events that occurred while the person was clinically dead or unconscious, observations that cannot be explained by normal sensory perception or logical deduction.

Dr. Janice Holden, who conducted the most comprehensive review of veridical perception cases in NDEs, analyzed 93 reports of potentially verifiable out-of-body perceptions. Her findings were remarkable: “In these cases, 43 percent had been corroborated to the investigator by an independent informant, an additional 43 percent had been reported by the experiencer to have been corroborated by an independent informant who was no longer available to be interviewed by the investigator, and only 14 percent relied solely on the experiencer’s report.”

Of these out-of-body perceptions, the accuracy rate was stunning: “92 percent were completely accurate, 6 percent contained some error, and only 1 percent was completely erroneous. And even among those cases corroborated to the investigator by an independent informant, 88 percent were completely accurate, 10 percent contained some error, and only 3 percent were completely erroneous.”

Let that sink in for a moment. People who were clinically dead, with no brain function, were accurately observing and later reporting details about events they could not possibly have seen or heard through normal means. And these weren’t just a few isolated cases—this pattern has been documented hundreds of times by researchers around the world.

The Dentures Case: A Classic Example

One of the most famous and well-documented cases of veridical perception comes from the Netherlands, reported by a coronary care unit nurse and verified by Dr. van Lommel’s research team. This case has become known simply as “the dentures case,” but its implications are profound.

Here’s what happened, in the nurse’s own words:

“During the night shift the ambulance crew brings in a forty-four-year-old cyanotic [bluish from lack of oxygen], comatose man. About an hour earlier he had been found in a public park by passers-by, who had initiated heart massage. After admission to the coronary care unit, he receives artificial respiration with a balloon and a mask as well as heart massage and defibrillation. When I want to intubate the patient, the patient turns out to have dentures in his mouth. Before intubating him, I remove the upper set of dentures and put it on the crash cart.

“Meanwhile we continue extensive resuscitation. After approximately ninety minutes, the patient has sufficient heart rhythm and blood pressure, but he’s still ventilated and intubated, and he remains comatose. In this state he is transferred to the intensive care unit for further respiration.

“After more than a week in coma the patient returns to the coronary care unit, and I see him when I distribute the medication. As soon as he sees me he says, ‘Oh, yes, but you, you know where my dentures are.’ I’m flabbergasted. Then he tells me, ‘Yes, you were there when they brought me into the hospital, and you took the dentures out of my mouth and put them on that cart; it had all these bottles on it, and there was a sliding drawer underneath, and you put my teeth there.’

“I was all the more amazed because I remembered this happening when the man was in a deep coma and undergoing resuscitation. After further questioning, it turned out that the patient had seen himself lying in bed and that he had watched from above how nursing staff and doctors had been busy resuscitating him.”

This case is particularly powerful because:

• The patient was in cardiac arrest and deep coma when the dentures were removed
• He had no brain function during this time
• He accurately described specific details about the crash cart, including the sliding drawer
• He correctly identified the specific nurse who had removed his dentures
• His observations were from a perspective above his body, watching the resuscitation efforts
• The nurse independently verified all the details before knowing about the patient’s NDE

Dr. Rudolf Smit, who conducted an extensive investigation of this case, interviewed multiple witnesses and concluded that there was no conventional explanation for how this patient could have known these details. The nurse who removed the dentures was absolutely certain the patient was deeply comatose and could not have observed anything through normal sensory channels.

Vision in the Blind: Seeing for the First Time

Perhaps even more remarkable than veridical perception in sighted individuals are the cases of blind people who report visual experiences during NDEs. Dr. Kenneth Ring and Sharon Cooper conducted the most comprehensive study of NDEs in the blind, interviewing 31 blind or severely visually impaired individuals who had NDEs or out-of-body experiences.

Their findings were astonishing. Of the 14 individuals who had been blind from birth, 9 reported visual experiences during their NDEs. These weren’t vague impressions of light and dark—they were detailed visual observations that were later verified as accurate.

Consider the case of Vicki Umipeg, a woman who had been blind from birth due to damage to her optic nerves. She had never seen anything in her entire life—not light, not shadows, nothing. Yet during her NDE following a car accident, she found herself floating above her body in the hospital:

“I knew it was me… I was pretty thin then. I was quite tall and thin at that point. And I recognized at first that it was a body, but I didn’t even know that it was mine initially. Then I perceived that I was up on the ceiling, and I thought, ‘Well, that’s kind of weird. What am I doing up here?’ I thought, ‘Well, this must be me. Am I dead?’… I just briefly saw this body, and… I knew that it was mine because I wasn’t in mine.”

She went on to accurately describe the medical team working on her body, the instruments they were using, and even her wedding ring and hair style—things she had never seen before. As Dr. Ring noted, “This was the first time in her life she had ever seen anything, and the first thing she saw was herself from above.”

Another powerful example comes from a five-year-old blind girl named Marta, whose NDE account was documented on the Near-Death Experience Research Foundation website:

“I slowly breathed in the water and became unconscious. A beautiful lady dressed in bright white light pulled me out. The lady looked into my eyes and asked me what I wanted. I was unable to think of anything until it occurred to me to travel around the lake. As I did so, I saw detail that I would not have seen in ‘real’ life. I could go anywhere, even to the tops of trees, simply by my intending to go there. I was legally blind. For the first time I was able to see leaves on trees, bird’s feathers, bird’s eyes, details on telephone poles and what was in people’s back yards. I was seeing far better than 20/20 vision.”

How do we explain this? If consciousness is produced by the brain, and vision specifically requires functioning visual cortex and optic nerves, how can people blind from birth suddenly see—and see accurately—during clinical death? The materialist model has no answer. But if consciousness can exist independently of the brain, if the soul can separate from the body, then these experiences begin to make sense.

Accurate Observations of Distant Events

Some of the most evidential cases involve accurate observations of events occurring far from the person’s physical body—events they could not possibly have known about through any normal means. These cases rule out any possibility of residual sensory perception or reconstructed memories based on overheard conversations.

Dr. Michael Sabom, a cardiologist who was initially skeptical of NDEs, documented numerous such cases. One involved a patient who, during his NDE, observed his wife in the hospital waiting room. He later accurately described:

• The specific clothes she was wearing
• Where she was sitting
• What she was doing (working on a crossword puzzle)
• Who came to speak with her
• The conversation they had about his condition

All of these details were later confirmed by his wife, who was amazed that he could know these things since he was in cardiac arrest in the operating room at the time.

In another remarkable case documented by Dr. Sabom, a patient accurately described a surgeon’s unusual behavior during the operation: “The patient described the cardiac surgeon ‘flapping his arms as if trying to fly.’ The surgeon later verified this, stating that after scrubbing in he flattened his hands on his chest to keep them sterile and was rapidly pointing with his elbows to give instructions.”

Think about this: The patient was under deep anesthesia with his eyes taped shut, yet he accurately observed and remembered an unusual behavior that no one would expect or imagine. This rules out the possibility that he was constructing a lucky guess based on his expectations of what happens during surgery.

The Failure of Materialist Explanations

Faced with this mounting evidence, materialist scientists have proposed various explanations for NDEs that don’t require the existence of a soul. Let’s examine these explanations and see why they fail to account for the full range of NDE phenomena, particularly veridical perceptions.

The Oxygen Deprivation Hypothesis

One of the most common explanations is that NDEs are caused by hypoxia (lack of oxygen to the brain) or anoxia (complete absence of oxygen). The theory suggests that as the brain becomes starved of oxygen, it produces hallucinations that we interpret as NDEs.

However, this explanation faces several fatal problems:

First, hypoxia typically causes confusion, disorientation, and fragmented, chaotic experiences—exactly the opposite of what we find in NDEs. As Dr. van Lommel points out: “In hypoxia, people experience confusion and agitation, and their memories are either nonexistent or chaotic. However, in an NDE people experience enhanced consciousness with lucid thoughts, logic, and very clear memories.”

Second, many NDEs occur in situations where oxygen levels are normal or even elevated. Some happen during non-life-threatening situations, and others occur when patients are being given supplemental oxygen. Yet the experiences are remarkably similar regardless of oxygen levels.

Third, and most importantly, oxygen deprivation cannot explain veridical perceptions. No amount of oxygen deprivation can enable someone to accurately observe events in another room or describe equipment they’ve never seen before.

The Dying Brain Hypothesis

Some researchers have proposed that NDEs are caused by a surge of electrical activity in the dying brain—a sort of “last gasp” of neural firing. In 2013, a study by Dr. Jimo Borjigin found that rats showed a burst of gamma wave activity for about 30 seconds after cardiac arrest.

But this explanation also fails for several reasons:

First, the burst of activity in rats lasted only 30 seconds, while many NDEs occur during cardiac arrests lasting much longer—sometimes 10, 20, or even 30 minutes or more.

Second, this activity was detected in rats, not humans. Human EEG readings during cardiac arrest show no such surge—they show a flat line within 15 seconds and remain flat.

Third, even if there were some residual electrical activity, it would be far too disorganized and minimal to produce the highly structured, lucid, memorable experiences reported in NDEs.

And once again, no amount of dying brain activity can explain how someone accurately observes events they couldn’t physically see or hear.

The Drug Hallucination Hypothesis

Another common explanation is that NDEs are hallucinations caused by drugs administered during medical emergencies or by endorphins released by the brain during trauma.

Yet this explanation fails because:

First, many NDEs occur without any drugs being administered. Some happen in accidents before medical help arrives, others in situations where no drugs are involved at all.

Second, drug-induced hallucinations are typically recognized as unreal afterward, while NDErs consistently report their experiences as “more real than real.”

Third, drug hallucinations are highly variable and often bizarre or frightening, while NDEs show remarkable consistency across cultures and include predominantly positive emotions (in non-hellish NDEs).

Fourth, drugs cannot produce accurate observations of verifiable events. A hallucination, by definition, is a false perception. Veridical perceptions in NDEs are accurate perceptions that are later verified as true.

The False Memory Hypothesis

Some skeptics suggest that NDEs are false memories constructed by the brain after the fact, perhaps based on things heard while semi-conscious or on cultural expectations about death.

This explanation is thoroughly refuted by several facts:

First, many veridical perceptions include details the person could not have known through any normal means—things that happened in other rooms, specific details about medical equipment never seen before, or conversations that occurred while they were demonstrably unconscious.

Second, children as young as three or four years old report NDEs with the same features as adults, even though they have no cultural knowledge or expectations about death.

Third, people from different cultures and religious backgrounds—including atheists—report remarkably similar core experiences, suggesting these are not culturally constructed memories.

Fourth, NDEs often include encounters with deceased relatives the person didn’t know had died, or in the case of young children, relatives they had never met or seen pictures of. These “Peak in Darien” experiences, as they’re called, cannot be explained as constructed memories.

The Testimony of Leading Scientists and Medical Professionals

It’s important to note that many of the scientists and physicians who have studied NDEs most closely have been forced by the evidence to abandon purely materialist explanations. These aren’t religious fanatics or wishful thinkers—they’re serious scientists who followed the evidence where it led.

Dr. Jeffrey Long, radiation oncologist and founder of the Near-Death Experience Research Foundation, which has collected over 5,000 NDE accounts, states unequivocally: “There is currently no plausible biological explanation for NDEs. The combination of the preceding nine lines of evidence converges on the conclusion that near-death experiences are medically inexplicable. Any one or several of the nine lines of evidence would likely be reasonably convincing for many scientists, but the combination of all of the presented nine lines of evidence provides powerful evidence that NDEs are, in a word, real.”

Dr. Bruce Greyson, Professor Emeritus of Psychiatry and Neurobehavioral Sciences at the University of Virginia, who has studied NDEs for over 40 years, writes: “The evidence from NDEs suggests that the mind or consciousness may continue to function when the brain is not working, and even after the brain has died. This challenges the prevailing assumption among neuroscientists that consciousness is created by the brain.”

Dr. Eben Alexander, a neurosurgeon who had his own profound NDE during a week-long coma caused by bacterial meningitis, underwent a complete transformation in his understanding. He writes: “My experience showed me that the death of the body and the brain are not the end of consciousness, that human experience continues beyond the grave. More important, it continues under the gaze of a God who loves and cares about each one of us.”

Dr. Sam Parnia, who leads the AWARE (AWAreness during REsuscitation) studies—the largest scientific studies of consciousness during cardiac arrest—states: “The evidence thus far suggests that in the first few minutes after death, consciousness is not annihilated. Whether it fades away afterwards, we do not know, but right after death, consciousness is not lost.”

Even more remarkably, Parnia adds: “These people were having these experiences when we wouldn’t expect them to happen, when the brain shouldn’t be able to sustain lucid processes or allow them to form memories that would last.”

Dr. Peter Fenwick, neuropsychiatrist and Fellow of the Royal College of Psychiatrists, who has studied NDEs for decades, concludes: “If the mind and brain can be independent, then that raises questions about the continuation of consciousness after death.”

These are not fringe scientists or believers looking for evidence to support their faith. These are mainstream medical professionals and researchers who have been compelled by the evidence to consider that consciousness may indeed be more than just a product of the brain.

The Philosophical Implications: What This Means for Human Nature

The evidence from NDEs has profound implications for our understanding of human nature. If consciousness can exist independently of the brain—if we really do have souls that can separate from our bodies—then materialism is false. We are not merely biological machines. We are not just our brains. We are spiritual beings temporarily inhabiting physical bodies.

This understanding transforms everything about how we view life and death. Death is not the end but a transition. Our loved ones who have died are not gone—they have simply moved from one form of existence to another. And our own death, while still a mystery to be approached with appropriate seriousness, need not be feared as the absolute end of our existence.

Professor Stuart Hameroff, who along with physicist Roger Penrose developed the Orch-OR theory of consciousness, suggests that consciousness may exist at a quantum level: “The soul may exist at a quantum level that can survive outside the body. If the patient is resuscitated, this quantum information can go back into the microtubules, and the patient says, ‘I had a near-death experience.’ But if they’re not revived, and the patient dies, it’s possible that this quantum information can exist outside the body, perhaps indefinitely, as a soul.”

This scientific speculation aligns remarkably well with what theologians have been saying for millennia. The soul is not physical in the ordinary sense, but it is real. It interacts with the physical body through the brain but is not reducible to brain activity.

Answering Common Objections

Let’s address some common objections raised by skeptics about using NDEs as evidence for the soul:

Objection 1: “NDEs are just anecdotal evidence, not real science”

This objection fails to acknowledge the rigorous scientific research that has been conducted on NDEs. Studies like Dr. van Lommel’s prospective study of 344 cardiac arrest patients, published in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet, follow strict scientific protocols. The AWARE studies led by Dr. Parnia involve multiple hospitals and hundreds of patients. These are not just collecting stories—they’re conducting controlled, prospective studies with objective measures.

Moreover, veridical perceptions provide objective, third-party verification of NDE claims. When a patient accurately describes equipment they’ve never seen, conversations that occurred while they were clinically dead, or events in distant locations, and these observations are independently verified by medical staff or family members, we have moved beyond subjective anecdote into objective evidence.

Objection 2: “People just see what they expect to see based on their religious beliefs”

While it’s true that cultural elements can influence the interpretation of NDEs, the core experiences are remarkably consistent across cultures and religions. Atheists report the same basic phenomena as religious believers. Young children who have no religious training or concept of death report similar experiences to adults.

Moreover, many NDErs report experiences that directly contradict their expectations. Atheists encounter spiritual beings or God. People see deceased relatives they didn’t know had died. Some Christians expecting to see Jesus instead encounter a being of light they can’t identify. If these were purely constructed from expectations, we wouldn’t see such contradictions.

Objection 3: “Brain scans might miss subtle activity that could explain consciousness”

This is what philosophers call an “argument from ignorance”—claiming that something we can’t detect must be there. Modern medical equipment is extremely sensitive. EEG machines can detect incredibly subtle electrical activity in the brain. fMRI machines can detect minute changes in blood flow. PET scans can detect metabolic activity at the cellular level.

When all of these instruments show no activity—when the EEG is flat, when there’s no blood flow to the brain, when metabolic activity has ceased—it’s not reasonable to postulate some hidden, undetectable brain activity that somehow produces the most vivid, clear, structured experiences of a person’s life.

Furthermore, even if there were some minimal, undetected activity, it couldn’t explain veridical perceptions. No amount of residual brain activity can enable someone to see events in another room or accurately describe equipment they’ve never encountered.

Objection 4: “Maybe consciousness is produced by the heart or other organs, not just the brain”

While it’s true that the heart has some neural tissue (about 40,000 neurons), this is nowhere near sufficient to produce consciousness. The heart’s neural network is primarily concerned with regulating heartbeat and responding to signals from the brain. It has less computational power than the nervous system of a snail.

Moreover, in many NDE cases during cardiac arrest, the heart has completely stopped. There’s no cardiac activity whatsoever. If consciousness required the heart’s neural activity, there would be no consciousness during cardiac arrest. Yet that’s precisely when many of the most profound NDEs occur.

Objection 5: “Science will eventually explain this without needing to invoke a soul”

This is what philosophers call “promissory materialism”—the faith that science will someday provide a materialist explanation for phenomena that currently seem to require non-material causes. But this isn’t science; it’s an article of faith in materialism.

The evidence we have now—not what we might discover in some hypothetical future—points strongly toward consciousness being independent of the brain. To dismiss this evidence in favor of an imagined future discovery is to abandon the scientific method in favor of materialist dogma.

As Sir John Eccles wisely observed: “Promissory materialism is a superstition without a rational foundation. The more we discover about the brain, the more clearly do we distinguish between the brain events and the mental phenomena, and the more wonderful do both the brain events and the mental phenomena become.”

The Transformation of Skeptics: When Scientists Change Their Minds

One of the most compelling aspects of NDE research is how it has transformed former skeptics into believers in the survival of consciousness. These are scientists and physicians who began their investigations expecting to debunk NDEs but were convinced by the evidence they encountered.

Dr. Michael Sabom, the cardiologist mentioned earlier, began his research as a complete skeptic. He had been challenged by a psychiatrist friend to actually look into NDEs rather than dismissing them out of hand. He writes: “I began my research with the expectation that I would quickly be able to dismiss these experiences as hallucinations, dreams, or fantasies. But the more I investigated, the more convinced I became that something extraordinary was happening.”

After years of careful research, including documenting numerous cases of accurate veridical perception, Sabom concluded: “The NDE, particularly the out-of-body experience, provides strong evidence that mind and brain are not the same thing, that human consciousness can exist independent of the physical body.”

Dr. Eben Alexander’s transformation is even more dramatic. As a neurosurgeon, he had spent his career believing that consciousness was produced by the brain. He writes: “I had always believed that there were good scientific explanations for the heavenly out-of-body journeys described by those who narrowly escaped death. I sympathized deeply with those who wanted to believe that there was something more, but I knew from my scientific training that such beliefs were simply fantasies.”

Then, in 2008, Alexander contracted a rare form of bacterial meningitis that shut down his entire cortex—the part of the brain thought to be responsible for consciousness. For seven days, he was in a deep coma with no higher brain function. According to everything he knew about neuroscience, he should have had no experience whatsoever during this time.

Instead, he had the most profound, transformative experience of his life—a journey through spiritual realms that he describes in vivid detail. When he recovered, he spent months trying to find a scientific explanation for what had happened to him. He consulted with colleagues, reviewed the medical literature, and analyzed his medical records.

His conclusion was inescapable: “My experience showed me that consciousness exists independent of the brain. I had experienced something that, according to current neuroscience, should have been impossible. Yet it happened, and it was more real than any experience I had ever had in my life.”

Dr. Mary Neal, an orthopedic surgeon, underwent a similar transformation after her own NDE during a kayaking accident. She had been underwater for at least 15 minutes—far longer than the brain can survive without oxygen. Yet she had a profound spiritual experience during this time, including accurate observations of the efforts to resuscitate her.

She writes: “As a spine surgeon, I was very familiar with the anatomy and physiology of the brain. I knew that what I experienced should have been impossible. Yet it happened, and it changed everything I thought I knew about consciousness and life after death.”

These are not people predisposed to believe in the supernatural. They are scientists and medical professionals trained in skeptical, evidence-based thinking. Yet when confronted with direct evidence that consciousness can exist independent of the brain, they had the intellectual honesty to follow that evidence where it led, even when it challenged their most fundamental assumptions.

The Convergence of Science and Scripture

What’s remarkable about the evidence from NDEs is how closely it aligns with biblical teaching about the nature of the soul and the reality of the afterlife. The Bible has always taught that we are more than our physical bodies, that consciousness survives death, and that there is a spiritual realm beyond the material world. Now, through the study of NDEs, science is providing empirical support for these ancient truths.

This convergence should not surprise us. If the Bible is true—if it really is God’s revelation to humanity—then we would expect scientific investigation to eventually confirm its teachings rather than contradict them. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing in NDE research.

Consider how NDE evidence aligns with specific biblical teachings:

The soul can separate from the body: Just as Paul spoke of being “caught up to the third heaven” whether “in the body or out of the body” (2 Corinthians 12:2), NDErs describe their consciousness separating from their physical bodies.

Consciousness continues after death: Jesus promised the thief on the cross, “Today you will be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:43). NDErs consistently report continued consciousness even when clinically dead.

There is a spiritual realm: The Bible speaks of heaven, angels, and spiritual beings. NDErs report encounters with deceased loved ones, spiritual beings, and heavenly realms.

Death is a transition, not an end: Paul wrote, “To be absent from the body is to be present with the Lord” (2 Corinthians 5:8). NDErs describe death not as cessation but as a transition to another form of existence.

Life review and judgment: The Bible teaches that we will give an account of our lives (Romans 14:12, 2 Corinthians 5:10). Many NDErs experience a life review where they see and feel the impact of their actions on others.

This alignment between scientific findings and biblical teaching should strengthen our faith. We’re not asked to believe in fairy tales or wish-fulfillment fantasies. The core claims of Christianity about human nature and the afterlife are being confirmed by rigorous scientific investigation.

The Practical Implications: How This Changes Everything

Understanding that we have souls—that we are more than our physical bodies—has profound implications for how we live our lives. This isn’t just abstract theology or philosophy; it fundamentally changes our perspective on everything that matters.

Death Loses Its Sting

If consciousness survives bodily death, then death is not the terrifying end that materialism makes it out to be. It’s a transition, certainly a mysterious and sobering one, but not the absolute termination of our existence. As Paul triumphantly declared, “Where, O death, is your victory? Where, O death, is your sting?” (1 Corinthians 15:55).

This doesn’t mean we should be casual about death or eager to die. Life is a precious gift from God, and we should treasure it. But we need not live in terror of death or be paralyzed by grief when loved ones die. They have not ceased to exist; they have simply moved into a different mode of existence.

Dr. Jeffrey Long’s research found that NDErs almost universally lose their fear of death. As one experiencer put it: “I’m not afraid of death anymore. I know that death is not the end but the beginning of something wonderful. That knowledge has freed me to really live.”

Life Has Ultimate Meaning

If materialism is true, then life has no ultimate meaning. We’re just accidental collections of atoms that briefly maintain a pattern before dispersing back into chaos. Nothing we do matters in the long run because in the long run, we’re all dead and forgotten.

But if we have souls, if consciousness survives death, then everything changes. Our choices matter eternally. The love we share, the kindness we show, the faith we maintain—all of these have significance beyond the grave. We’re not just biological machines running out our programming; we’re eternal beings whose actions echo in eternity.

Many NDErs report that during their life review, they experienced not just their own perspective but felt the impact of their actions on others. One experiencer described it this way: “I felt everything I had ever done to others. Every kindness was multiplied and came back to me as joy. Every hurt I had caused was felt as if I were the one being hurt. I understood that everything we do matters, that every action ripples out and affects others in ways we can’t imagine.”

Relationships Are Forever

If we’re just our bodies, then all relationships end at death. The love you share with family and friends is nothing more than neurochemical reactions that cease when the brain stops functioning.

But if we have souls, then love transcends death. The bonds we form in this life continue into the next. Many NDErs report joyful reunions with deceased loved ones, experiencing their love as powerfully as ever—often more powerfully than in earthly life.

This transforms how we view grief and loss. Yes, we grieve the physical absence of loved ones who have died. But we grieve with hope, knowing that separation is temporary and reunion is certain for those who are in Christ.

Our Bodies Are Temples, Not Prisons

The evidence that consciousness can exist apart from the body doesn’t mean we should despise or neglect our bodies. The Bible teaches that our bodies are temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19). They are the vehicles through which we experience and interact with God’s physical creation.

But understanding that we are more than our bodies liberates us from the tyranny of physical appearance and the despair of physical decline. We are not defined by our bodies. A person with severe physical disabilities is no less valuable, no less fully human, than an Olympic athlete. An elderly person whose body is failing is not diminishing as a person; they are simply preparing for the transition to a different form of existence.

The Priority of Spiritual Development

If we are fundamentally spiritual beings, then spiritual development should be our highest priority. Jesus asked, “What good is it for someone to gain the whole world, yet forfeit their soul?” (Mark 8:36). This isn’t just religious rhetoric—it’s a statement about the fundamental nature of reality.

Many NDErs report that during their experience, earthly concerns that had seemed so important—money, status, possessions—suddenly seemed trivial. What mattered was love, compassion, forgiveness, and spiritual growth. As one experiencer put it: “I realized that the only things we take with us when we die are the love we’ve shared and the person we’ve become. Everything else is left behind.”

Responding to the Reality of the Soul

So what should we do with this knowledge? How should the evidence that we have souls that survive bodily death affect how we live?

1. Embrace Your True Identity

Stop thinking of yourself as merely a biological machine. You are a spiritual being created in the image of God. Your consciousness, your ability to think and feel and choose, reflects the divine nature. You have inherent dignity and worth that transcends your physical circumstances.

This means treating yourself with appropriate respect. Your body is important as the temple of your soul, but you are not defined by your physical appearance or abilities. Your true worth comes from being a conscious being capable of relationship with God and others.

2. Invest in What Lasts

Since consciousness survives death, invest your life in what will matter beyond the grave. Jesus taught, “Store up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where moths and vermin do not destroy, and where thieves do not break in and steal” (Matthew 6:20).

This doesn’t mean neglecting earthly responsibilities, but it does mean keeping eternal perspective. Prioritize relationships over possessions. Choose love over selfishness. Pursue spiritual growth over worldly success. These are the investments that pay eternal dividends.

3. Live Without Fear

The evidence that consciousness survives death should liberate us from the paralyzing fear of death that grips so many. Yes, the process of dying may involve suffering, and we naturally want to avoid pain. But death itself—the separation of soul from body—need not be feared.

NDErs consistently report that the moment of death itself is peaceful, even blissful. The transition from physical to spiritual existence is not traumatic but natural. As one experiencer described it: “Dying was the easiest thing I ever did. It was like taking off a heavy coat I had been wearing my whole life.”

4. Treat Others as Eternal Beings

Every person you meet is an eternal soul. The cashier at the grocery store, the difficult colleague, the family member who frustrates you—each one is a spiritual being of infinite worth. C.S. Lewis put it powerfully:

“It is a serious thing to live in a society of possible gods and goddesses, to remember that the dullest most uninteresting person you can talk to may one day be a creature which, if you saw it now, you would be strongly tempted to worship, or else a horror and a corruption such as you now meet, if at all, only in a nightmare. All day long we are, in some degree helping each other to one or other of these destinations.”

How different would our relationships be if we truly saw others as eternal souls rather than temporary biological entities?

5. Prepare for Eternity

If consciousness survives death, then what happens after death matters enormously. The Bible is clear that our eternal destiny depends on our relationship with God through Jesus Christ. This isn’t about earning salvation through good works but about accepting the gift of salvation offered through Christ’s sacrifice.

Many NDErs report encountering a being of light who radiates perfect love and acceptance but also perfect holiness. Some experience a life review where they see their lives from a perspective of absolute truth. This aligns with the biblical teaching that “we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad” (2 Corinthians 5:10).

The evidence from NDEs should motivate us to take our spiritual lives seriously, to seek relationship with God, and to live in a way that we won’t regret when we see our lives from an eternal perspective.

Conclusion: The Soul Changes Everything

The evidence from near-death experiences, particularly the phenomenon of veridical perception during clinical death, provides powerful scientific support for what the Bible has always taught: we are more than our physical bodies. We have souls that can exist independently of our brains. Consciousness is not produced by neural activity but is a fundamental aspect of our spiritual nature.

This isn’t a minor theological detail or an interesting philosophical speculation. It’s a truth that changes everything about how we understand ourselves, how we live our lives, and how we face death. We are not biological machines destined for oblivion. We are eternal spiritual beings temporarily inhabiting physical bodies, designed for relationship with God and destined for continued existence beyond the grave.

The convergence of scientific evidence from NDE research with biblical teaching should encourage us. We’re not asked to believe despite the evidence but because of it. The materialist worldview that dominates modern culture is being challenged by the very science that was supposed to support it. Study after study, case after case, the evidence mounts that consciousness transcends the physical brain.

The implications are staggering: Every human being you will ever meet is an eternal soul. Every choice you make has significance beyond the grave. Death is not the end but a doorway. And most importantly, the gospel message that God loves us and offers us eternal life through Jesus Christ is not mythology or wishful thinking—it’s grounded in the fundamental reality of human nature as revealed by both Scripture and science.

Dr. Pim van Lommel, after decades of studying NDEs, concluded: “Death is not death, but another form of life.” The apostle Paul, writing nearly 2000 years earlier, said essentially the same thing: “For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain” (Philippians 1:21). The evidence from NDEs shows us that Paul wasn’t speaking metaphorically or engaging in religious hyperbole. He was describing the fundamental nature of reality.

We are souls. We are eternal. And that changes everything.

The question now is not whether you have a soul—the evidence is overwhelming that you do. The question is: What will you do with this knowledge? Will you continue living as if this physical life is all there is? Or will you embrace your true nature as a spiritual being and live in light of eternity?

The choice is yours. But choose wisely—because that choice, like your soul itself, will last forever.

Bibliography

Alexander, Eben. Proof of Heaven: A Neurosurgeon’s Journey into the Afterlife. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2012.

Bellg, Laurin. Near Death in the ICU: Stories from Patients Near Death and Why We Should Listen to Them. Sloan Press, 2016.

Berkhof, L. Systematic Theology. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1941.

Brace, Robin A. “Near Death Experiences: Is it time for a Christian Reappraisal.” ukapologetics.net.

Brace, Robin A. “Scientific Evidence Grows That Mind and Brain are Separate.” ukapologetics.net.

Burke, John. Imagine Heaven: Near-Death Experiences, God’s Promises, and the Exhilarating Future That Awaits You. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2015.

Burpo, Todd, and Lynn Vincent. Heaven is for Real: A Little Boy’s Astounding Story of His Trip to Heaven and Back. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2010.

Chalmers, David J. “Consciousness and Its Place in Nature.” In Philosophy of Mind: Classical and Contemporary Readings. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

Cooper, Sharon, and Kenneth Ring. Mindsight: Near-Death and Out-of-Body Experiences in the Blind. Palo Alto, CA: William James Center/Institute of Transpersonal Psychology, 1999.

Dennett, Daniel. Consciousness Explained. Boston and London: Little, Brown, 1991.

Eccles, John C. Evolution of the Brain, Creation of the Self. London and New York: Routledge, 1989.

Elahi, Bahram. Medicine of the Soul: Foundations of Natural Spirituality. Cornwall Books, 2001.

Greyson, Bruce. After: A Doctor Explores What Near-Death Experiences Reveal about Life and Beyond. New York: St. Martin’s Press, 2021.

Habermas, Gary, and J.P. Moreland. Beyond Death: Exploring the Evidence for Immortality. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2004.

Hodge, Charles. Systematic Theology, Volume III. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1979.

Holden, Janice Miner. “Veridical Perception in Near-Death Experiences.” In The Handbook of Near-Death Experiences: Thirty Years of Investigation, edited by Janice M. Holden, Bruce Greyson, and Debbie James, 185-211. Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger/ABC-CLIO, 2009.

Kelly, Edward F., Emily Williams Kelly, Adam Crabtree, Alan Gauld, Michael Grosso, and Bruce Greyson. Irreducible Mind: Toward a Psychology for the 21st Century. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.

Long, Jeffrey, with Paul Perry. Evidence of the Afterlife: The Science of Near-Death Experiences. New York: HarperOne, 2010.

Moody, Raymond. Life After Life: The Investigation of a Phenomenon—Survival of Bodily Death. New York: Bantam, 1975.

Morse, Melvin, with Paul Perry. Closer to the Light: Learning from the Near-Death Experiences of Children. New York: Villard Books, 1990.

Neal, Mary C. To Heaven and Back: A Doctor’s Extraordinary Account of Her Death, Heaven, Angels, and Life Again. Colorado Springs: WaterBrook Press, 2012.

Parnia, Sam. Erasing Death: The Science That Is Rewriting the Boundaries Between Life and Death. New York: HarperOne, 2013.

Parnia, Sam. Lucid Dying: The New Science Revolutionizing How We Understand Life and Death. New York: Hachette Books, 2024.

Penrose, Roger. Shadows of the Mind: A Search for the Missing Science of Consciousness. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Popper, Karl, and John C. Eccles. The Self and Its Brain. New York: Springer, 1977.

Ring, Kenneth. Life at Death: A Scientific Investigation of the Near-Death Experience. New York: Coward, McCann & Geoghegan, 1980.

Sabom, Michael. Light and Death: One Doctor’s Fascinating Account of Near-Death Experiences. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1998.

Sabom, Michael. Recollections of Death: A Medical Investigation. New York: Harper & Row, 1982.

Sartori, Penny. The Near-Death Experiences of Hospitalized Intensive Care Patients: A Five-Year Clinical Study. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2008.

Smit, Rudolf H. “Corroboration of the Dentures Anecdote Involving Veridical Perception in a Near-Death Experience.” Journal of Near-Death Studies 27 (2008): 47-61.

van Lommel, Pim. Consciousness Beyond Life: The Science of the Near-Death Experience. New York: HarperOne, 2010.

van Lommel, Pim, Ruud van Wees, Vincent Meyers, and Ingrid Elfferich. “Near-Death Experience in Survivors of Cardiac Arrest: A Prospective Study in the Netherlands.” The Lancet 358 (2001): 2039-2045.

© 2025, LearnTheology.com. All rights reserved.