When we step back and look at the landscape of Near-Death Experiences through the lens of Scripture, we find ourselves standing at a fascinating crossroads. On one path, we see remarkable alignments between what thousands of people have reported experiencing at death’s door and what the Bible teaches about the afterlife. On the other path, we encounter tensions that challenge us to think more deeply about both the nature of these experiences and our understanding of biblical truth. The question we must wrestle with is not whether NDEs are real—the evidence overwhelmingly suggests they are—but rather how we, as Christians committed to biblical authority, should understand and interpret them.

In the previous chapters, we’ve explored what NDEs are and what the Bible says about the afterlife. Now comes the crucial task of bringing these two streams of knowledge together. As we do this work of comparison, we must approach it with both intellectual honesty and spiritual discernment, always keeping Scripture as our ultimate standard of truth while remaining open to what God might be revealing through these remarkable experiences.

Key Principle for This Chapter: We examine NDEs not to validate Scripture—God’s Word needs no validation from human experience—but to understand how these experiences might illuminate biblical truths and where they might diverge from them. Scripture remains our plumb line, our unchanging standard by which all experiences must be measured.

The Challenge of Comparison

Before we dive into the specific points of alignment and tension, we need to acknowledge the unique challenge we face. NDEs are, by their very nature, subjective experiences that occur in extreme circumstances. The Bible, on the other hand, is God’s objective revelation to humanity. When we compare them, we’re not comparing equals. As Dr. J. Steve Miller notes in his comprehensive study, “NDEs/DBEs are remarkable void of doctrinal teaching. It’s almost as if angels and deceased relatives were instructed to ‘stick to the mission’ and not get chatty about doctrine” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible With Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences?, Chapter 3, “Biblical Consistency”). This observation itself is significant—if NDEs were fabrications or deceptions, wouldn’t we expect them to be full of theological claims?

The challenge becomes even more complex when we consider what theologians call hermeneutics—the principles of biblical interpretation. When the Apostle Paul speaks of being “caught up to the third heaven” (2 Corinthians 12:2-4), he uses language that resonates deeply with modern NDE accounts. Yet Paul himself says he heard “inexpressible words, which a man is not permitted to speak” (2 Corinthians 12:4, NASB). This ineffability—the inability to fully express spiritual experiences in human language—is one of the most consistent features of NDEs.

Dr. Michael Sabom, a cardiologist who has extensively studied NDEs among his patients, makes this important observation: “The near-death experience proves to be a challenge to the materialism of modern science, just as it challenges those who are spiritually inclined to interpret its meaning properly” (Sabom, Light & Death, Chapter 11, “Conclusions: The Bible and the Near-Death Experience”). This dual challenge—to both scientific materialism and spiritual interpretation—places us in a position where we must carefully navigate between uncritical acceptance and wholesale dismissal.

Part I: Points of Powerful Congruence

Let’s begin with the remarkable ways in which NDEs align with biblical teaching. These alignments are not superficial or forced; they represent deep structural similarities that suggest we’re dealing with genuine spiritual experiences that connect to the same ultimate reality described in Scripture.

1. The Being of Light: Divine Radiance Revealed

Perhaps no element of the NDE is more striking than the encounter with what experiencers consistently call “the Being of Light.” This figure, often identified as God or Christ, appears in the vast majority of positive NDEs and bears remarkable similarity to biblical descriptions of divine glory.

Scripture declares with crystal clarity: “God is light; in him there is no darkness at all” (1 John 1:5, NIV). This is not merely metaphorical language but seems to describe something fundamental about God’s nature. Throughout Scripture, divine encounters are consistently associated with overwhelming light. When Moses came down from Mount Sinai after meeting with God, “his face was radiant because he had spoken with the Lord” (Exodus 34:29, NIV). The transfiguration of Jesus revealed His divine glory as “His face shone like the sun, and his clothes became as white as the light” (Matthew 17:2, NIV).

What makes the NDE accounts particularly compelling is how they describe this light in ways that transcend normal human experience yet align perfectly with biblical descriptions. One cardiac patient in Dr. Sabom’s study reported: “The light was overwhelming… It was a light that didn’t hurt your eyes, even though it was brighter than anything I’d ever seen” (Sabom, Light & Death, Chapter 7, “The Light”). This paradoxical quality—brilliant beyond description yet not painful to perceive—echoes the biblical promise that in the New Jerusalem, “The city does not need the sun or the moon to shine on it, for the glory of God gives it light, and the Lamb is its lamp” (Revelation 21:23, NIV).

Dr. Jeffrey Long, who has compiled the largest database of NDE accounts through the Near-Death Experience Research Foundation, found that encounters with this divine light consistently produce the same effects: overwhelming love, complete acceptance, and profound peace. He notes: “Years after their experiences, a ‘huge majority’ reported that ‘religious/spiritual life was of increased importance to them'” (Long and Perry, God and the Afterlife, cited in Miller, Chapter 8, footnote 218). This lasting spiritual transformation aligns with the biblical principle that genuine encounters with God fundamentally change people.

But here’s where the alignment becomes even more specific and remarkable. In many NDEs, the Being of Light is explicitly identified as Jesus Christ. Dr. Miller’s research reveals: “Jesus is the single most frequently encountered person in an NDE” (Miller, citing A Catholic Understanding of the Near Death Experience). This is particularly significant when we consider that these experiences occur across cultures and religious backgrounds. Why would Jesus be so prominent if these were merely psychological projections or culturally conditioned hallucinations?

Theological Insight: The consistency of the “Being of Light” across thousands of NDE accounts suggests we’re not dealing with random hallucinations but with encounters with a specific spiritual reality. The biblical teaching that God is essentially light (1 John 1:5) and that Christ is “the light of the world” (John 8:12) provides a theological framework for understanding these experiences.

2. The Life Review: Echoes of Divine Judgment

One of the most profound and transformative elements of many NDEs is the life review—a panoramic, often three-dimensional replay of one’s entire life, experienced not just from one’s own perspective but from the perspectives of everyone affected by one’s actions. This element bears a striking resemblance to biblical teachings about judgment, though with important nuances we must carefully consider.

Scripture teaches clearly that “we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad” (2 Corinthians 5:10, NIV). The concept of a comprehensive evaluation of one’s life is thoroughly biblical. Ecclesiastes 12:14 declares, “For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every hidden thing, whether it is good or evil” (NIV).

What’s remarkable about NDE life reviews is how they capture both the comprehensiveness and the moral clarity of biblical judgment while emphasizing God’s love and desire for our growth rather than condemnation. As one experiencer in the NDERF database reported: “When I became burdened with guilt I was directed to other events which gave joy to others. Though I felt unworthy, it seemed the balance was in my favor. I received great Love” (cited in A Catholic Understanding of the Near Death Experience, Chapter on “Life Review”).

This aligns beautifully with the biblical balance between justice and mercy. While God’s judgment is real and comprehensive, Scripture also reveals His heart: “The Lord is compassionate and gracious, slow to anger, abounding in love” (Psalm 103:8, NIV). The life review in NDEs often functions more as a teaching tool than a condemning judgment, which makes sense when we remember that NDEs occur at “halftime,” not at the final judgment.

Dr. Miller makes this crucial observation: “Regarding the charge that those experiencing NDEs don’t report God judging them, those who experience a life review are confronted with the reality and impact of both their good deeds and bad deeds, which results in people judging themselves” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 5, “Theological Objections”). This self-judgment in the presence of divine love actually aligns with Jesus’ words: “This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil” (John 3:19, NIV). The judgment, in a sense, is self-evident when we see our lives in the light of God’s perfect love.

One particularly detailed life review account provides theological depth to our understanding. Hal’s experience, as recorded in A Catholic Understanding, involved finding his “life record” in heaven: “They found my life record, which was unexpectedly written old style on hide. It was no larger than a business card. I asked how my entire life could be contained in a few lines of writing. I was told that the writing told of my moral makeup and the moral abilities and the damage or limitations done to them by original sin” (Chapter on “Life Review”). This account remarkably parallels the biblical concept of books in heaven recording our deeds, as described in Revelation 20:12: “And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened… The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books” (NIV).

3. Heavenly Realms: Beauty Beyond Imagination

The descriptions of heavenly realms in NDEs consistently emphasize extraordinary beauty that transcends earthly experience, yet these descriptions often echo specific biblical imagery. This convergence is particularly striking given that many experiencers have limited biblical knowledge.

Scripture provides glimpses of heavenly beauty that find remarkable parallels in NDE accounts. John’s vision in Revelation describes the New Jerusalem: “It shone with the glory of God, and its brilliance was like that of a very precious jewel, like a jasper, clear as crystal… The wall was made of jasper, and the city of pure gold, as pure as glass. The foundations of the city walls were decorated with every kind of precious stone” (Revelation 21:11, 18-19, NIV).

Dr. Sabom’s cardiac patients described the other side in strikingly similar terms: “Flowers, trees of all kinds, beautiful flower gardens…” “Top of a mountain…just beautiful up there…ethereal beauty.” “Just another world…bright sunny world…real beautiful.” “Beautiful panorama…just beyond words” (Sabom, Light & Death, descriptions compiled from patient accounts). The common thread is beauty that exceeds human language’s capacity to describe—exactly what we would expect if these were genuine glimpses of the divine realm described in Scripture.

But the alignment goes deeper than mere beauty. Many NDEs describe specific features that correspond to biblical descriptions. The presence of a river or stream of crystal-clear water appears frequently in NDEs, paralleling Revelation 22:1: “Then the angel showed me the river of the water of life, as clear as crystal, flowing from the throne of God and of the Lamb” (NIV). Gardens, meadows, and extraordinary vegetation are common, echoing the biblical imagery of Paradise as a garden and the Tree of Life bearing twelve kinds of fruit (Revelation 22:2).

Dr. Miller notes an important theological point here: “It seems that in the Bible we get only snippets of this heavenly world; certainly the Bible never claims that it gives us an exhaustive look at what heaven will be like” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 3, “Biblical Consistency”). This observation is crucial because it means we shouldn’t expect NDEs to match a rigid biblical template but rather to resonate with biblical themes while potentially revealing additional details about the afterlife’s richness and diversity.

4. The Communion of Saints: Meeting Deceased Loved Ones

One of the most emotionally powerful and theologically significant aspects of NDEs is the encounter with deceased relatives and friends. This element appears in the vast majority of NDEs and finds strong support in biblical teaching about the communion of saints.

The writer of Hebrews describes believers who have died as “a great cloud of witnesses” (Hebrews 12:1, NIV), suggesting they maintain awareness and interest in earthly events. Jesus Himself spoke of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as living, not dead: “He is not the God of the dead but of the living, for to him all are alive” (Luke 20:38, NIV). The parable of the rich man and Lazarus (Luke 16:19-31) depicts conscious existence after death with recognition and communication between individuals.

What’s particularly striking about NDE encounters with the deceased is how they consistently describe these individuals as fully themselves yet transformed—younger, healthier, more radiant. This aligns with Paul’s teaching about the resurrection body: “So will it be with the resurrection of the dead. The body that is sown is perishable, it is raised imperishable; it is sown in dishonor, it is raised in glory; it is sown in weakness, it is raised in power; it is sown a natural body, it is raised a spiritual body” (1 Corinthians 15:42-44, NIV).

Dr. Raymond Moody, the pioneering NDE researcher, coined the term “spiritual body” to describe the form NDEers report having during their experiences, noting: “So, to adopt a term for it which will sum up its properties fairly well…I shall henceforth call it the ‘spiritual body'” (Moody, cited in Miller, Chapter 3). This terminology directly echoes Paul’s language in 1 Corinthians 15:44.

Important Distinction: While NDEs involve meeting deceased loved ones, this should not be confused with necromancy or séances, which Scripture forbids (Deuteronomy 18:10-12). In NDEs, the experiencer doesn’t seek out the dead; rather, they find themselves in the spiritual realm where these encounters naturally occur. The initiative comes from God, not from human attempts to contact the dead.

5. Transformation of Values: The Fruit of Authentic Spiritual Experience

One of the most compelling evidences for the spiritual authenticity of NDEs is the profound and lasting transformation they produce in experiencers’ lives. These changes align remarkably with biblical descriptions of spiritual transformation and the fruit of genuine encounters with God.

Jesus taught, “By their fruit you will recognize them” (Matthew 7:16, NIV), establishing transformation as a key marker of authentic spiritual experience. The changes reported by NDEers consistently reflect the “fruit of the Spirit” described in Galatians 5:22-23: “love, joy, peace, forbearance, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness and self-control” (NIV).

Dr. Penny Sartori’s five-year clinical study found that “All patients reported an increased tendency to pray, go to church, and read the Bible” following their NDEs (Sartori, The Near-Death Experiences of Hospitalized Intensive Care Patients, cited in Miller). Dr. Sabom similarly found that his Christian patients became more committed to their faith, not less: “A belief in reincarnation and in Eastern, universalist religion is not a direct aftereffect of the near-death experience” (Sabom, cited in Miller, Chapter 10).

The specific transformations reported by NDEers align with biblical priorities:
– Loss of fear of death (consistent with Philippians 1:21: “For to me, to live is Christ and to die is gain”)
– Increased love and compassion (reflecting 1 Corinthians 13’s emphasis on love as supreme)
– Decreased materialism (echoing Jesus’ teaching: “Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth” – Matthew 6:19)
– Enhanced sense of purpose and meaning (aligning with Ephesians 2:10: “For we are God’s handiwork, created in Christ Jesus to do good works”)

The consistency of these transformations across thousands of cases suggests we’re dealing with genuine spiritual experiences that connect people to the same Source of transformation described in Scripture—the God who makes all things new.

Part II: Points of Tension and Theological Challenge

While the alignments between NDEs and Scripture are remarkable, we must honestly address the areas where tensions arise. These tensions don’t necessarily invalidate NDEs, but they do require careful theological reflection and discernment. As Scripture commands, we must “test the spirits to see whether they are from God” (1 John 4:1, NIV).

1. The Specter of Universalism

Perhaps the most significant theological tension arising from some NDE accounts is the suggestion of universalism—the belief that all people will ultimately be saved regardless of their response to Christ. This stands in stark contrast to Jesus’ clear teaching about the exclusivity of salvation through Him.

Jesus declared unequivocally: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6, NIV). This statement leaves no room for alternative paths to God. Yet some NDEers report being told that all religions lead to God or that everyone will eventually be saved. Dr. Miller identifies this as a major red flag: “Universalism (all paths lead to God) contradicts the exclusivity of Christ (John 14:6)” (Miller, Chapter 6 outline).

Dr. Miller provides important analysis here. He notes that some popular NDE accounts, particularly those that become bestsellers, may be precisely the ones that promote unbiblical messages. For instance, he cites Eben Alexander’s account as “an example of a message lacking the need for Christ” and Betty Eadie’s Embraced by the Light as teaching doctrines that “add to or contradict Scripture” (Miller, Chapter 8 outline, “A Wolf in Sheep’s Clothing”).

However, we must be careful not to paint all NDEs with the universalist brush. Dr. Miller’s research reveals that “Jesus is the single most frequently encountered person in an NDE” across all cultures and religious backgrounds. Many NDEers actually become more committed to Christ after their experiences, not less. As the Catholic perspective notes: “Where NDE patients (of any or no religion) identify a judge or ruler of Heaven, it is always Jesus” (A Catholic Understanding, Chapter on “Universal Salvation”).

The key to understanding this tension may lie in recognizing that NDEs occur at what Dr. Miller calls “halftime, not the end of the fourth quarter.” The overwhelming love and acceptance many experience may reflect God’s current posture of grace during this age of salvation, not His final judgment. As Scripture says, “The Lord is not slow in keeping his promise, as some understand slowness. Instead he is patient with you, not wanting anyone to perish, but everyone to come to repentance” (2 Peter 3:9, NIV).

Furthermore, we must consider the source of universalist messages in NDEs. Dr. Miller warns about spiritual deception: “Because NDEs are powerful spiritual experiences, they are a prime target for demonic ‘hijacking'” (Miller, Chapter 8 outline). Paul warned that “Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light” (2 Corinthians 11:14, NIV). Some universalist messages in NDEs may represent demonic deception rather than divine revelation.

Critical Discernment Point: When an NDE promotes universalism or diminishes the unique role of Christ in salvation, this should raise immediate red flags. Such messages contradict clear biblical teaching and may indicate either demonic deception or human misinterpretation of the experience. Always test the message against Scripture.

2. The Question of Second Chances

Some NDE accounts suggest the possibility of salvation decisions after death, which seems to conflict with Hebrews 9:27: “Just as people are destined to die once, and after that to face judgment” (NIV). This verse appears to establish a clear sequence: death, then judgment, with no opportunity for post-mortem conversion.

However, Dr. Miller provides important contextual analysis of this passage. He notes that the Greek word for “die” can have different meanings depending on context, and in Hebrews 9 it “obviously refers to a person’s ‘final death'” (Miller, Is Christianity Compatible, Chapter 5). He points out that if the verse meant no one could experience clinical death more than once, it would contradict the biblical accounts of people like Lazarus who died and were raised, only to die again later.

Furthermore, Miller notes that “the Hebrews passage doesn’t specify that the judgment takes place ‘immediately’ upon even final death” (Miller, Chapter 5). The judgment referenced may be the final judgment at the end of the age, not an immediate post-death judgment. This interpretation would allow for the kind of educational or preparatory experiences some NDEers report without contradicting Scripture.

Still, we must be extremely cautious about any suggestion that salvation decisions can be postponed until after death. The consistent biblical message is urgent: “Now is the time of God’s favor, now is the day of salvation” (2 Corinthians 6:2, NIV). While God’s mercy is great and His ways are higher than ours (Isaiah 55:9), we cannot presume upon opportunities that Scripture doesn’t clearly promise.

3. Varying and Contradictory Details

While there’s remarkable consistency in the core elements of NDEs, specific details sometimes vary or even contradict. Some see Jesus with blue eyes, others with brown. Some describe angels with wings, others without. Some report traditional harps and clouds, others describe advanced cities of light. How do we make sense of these variations?

Dr. Miller offers a helpful framework for understanding these discrepancies. He distinguishes between “Flawed Human Interpretation” and “Demonic Injection” (Miller, Chapter 9 outline). Flawed human interpretation occurs when “a person trying to describe the indescribable with familiar imagery (e.g., angels with wings). This doesn’t invalidate the core experience.” Demonic injection, on the other hand, involves “a corruption of the core theological message (e.g., ‘Jesus is not the only way’). This is the true danger.”

The Bible itself acknowledges the challenge of describing heavenly realities in human terms. Paul speaks of hearing “inexpressible things, things that no one is permitted to tell” (2 Corinthians 12:4, NIV). John’s Revelation uses highly symbolic language to convey spiritual truths. If biblical authors struggled to describe heavenly realities, how much more would ordinary people having brief glimpses?

Moreover, as Dr. Miller observes, “the Bible never claims that it gives us an exhaustive look at what heaven will be like” (Miller, Chapter 3). The Bible gives us essential truths about the afterlife, not a comprehensive catalog of every detail. Variations in NDE accounts may simply reflect the vastness and diversity of the spiritual realm rather than contradictions in essential truth.

4. The Absence of Biblical Imagery

Some critics point out that NDEs don’t always include specifically biblical imagery. Where are the four living creatures of Ezekiel? Where is the sea of glass? Where are the twenty-four elders? As one critic argues, “in every instance in the Bible where a mere mortal has a heavenly vision, that person—if he mentions himself at all—is frightened, hyper-aware of his own insignificance, deeply conscious of his guilt and fallenness” (MacArthur, cited in Miller, Chapter 4).

But Dr. Miller effectively rebuts this argument by pointing to biblical counter-examples. Stephen’s vision of heaven didn’t leave him frightened but filled with the Holy Spirit (Acts 7:54-60). Paul’s experience of the third heaven doesn’t mention fear (2 Corinthians 12:1-6). Miller asks pointedly: “Since Ezekiel reported seeing four strange creatures in his heavenly vision, should we expect every vision of heaven to include the same creatures?” (Miller, Chapter 4).

The absence of specific biblical imagery in many NDEs may actually support their authenticity rather than undermine it. If NDEs were fabrications based on religious expectations, wouldn’t we expect them to more closely mirror popular biblical imagery? The fact that they often don’t suggests experiencers are reporting what they actually experienced rather than what they expected to see.

Part III: A Framework for Biblical Discernment

Given both the remarkable alignments and the genuine tensions between NDEs and Scripture, how should Christians approach these experiences? We need a robust framework for biblical discernment that neither dismisses all NDEs as deception nor accepts them all uncritically.

The Three Essential Questions

Dr. Miller provides a helpful framework based on 1 John 4:1’s command to “test the spirits.” He outlines three critical questions for discernment (Miller, Chapter 9 outline):

1. The Question of Christ: What does the experience teach about Jesus? Does it affirm His unique identity as the Son of God and exclusive Savior? Any NDE that diminishes Christ’s deity or His exclusive role in salvation should be rejected. As John writes, “Every spirit that acknowledges that Jesus Christ has come in the flesh is from God, but every spirit that does not acknowledge Jesus is not from God” (1 John 4:2-3, NIV).

2. The Question of the Gospel: What message about salvation does the experience convey? Does it align with salvation by grace through faith in Christ alone, or does it promote universalism or works-righteousness? Paul warned, “But even if we or an angel from heaven should preach a gospel other than the one we preached to you, let them be under God’s curse!” (Galatians 1:8, NIV). Any NDE promoting a different gospel should be rejected.

3. The Question of Fruit: What is the long-term effect of the experience? Does it lead to humility, holiness, and love for the church, or to spiritual pride and unbiblical doctrines? Jesus taught, “By their fruit you will recognize them” (Matthew 7:16, NIV). Genuine spiritual experiences produce godly fruit.

These three questions provide a biblical filter through which every NDE account should pass. Experiences that fail any of these tests should be approached with extreme caution or rejected outright.

The Hierarchy of Authority

As we evaluate NDEs, we must maintain a clear hierarchy of authority. Scripture stands supreme as God’s revealed Word, complete and sufficient for faith and practice. As Paul writes, “All Scripture is God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in righteousness” (2 Timothy 3:16, NIV).

NDEs, at best, can illustrate or illuminate biblical truths, but they can never supersede or add to Scripture. Dr. Miller emphasizes this crucial point: “We examine NDEs not to validate Scripture—God’s Word needs no validation from human experience—but to understand how these experiences might illuminate biblical truths” (Chapter 6 introduction).

When an NDE aligns with Scripture, it may serve as a powerful contemporary testimony to biblical truth. When it contradicts Scripture, it must be rejected regardless of how compelling or beautiful it seems. As Isaiah warns, “To the law and to the testimony! If they do not speak according to this word, they have no light of dawn” (Isaiah 8:20, NIV).

The Role of Spiritual Warfare

We cannot discuss NDEs without acknowledging the reality of spiritual warfare. Paul reminds us, “For our struggle is not against flesh and blood, but against the rulers, against the authorities, against the powers of this dark world and against the spiritual forces of evil in the heavenly realms” (Ephesians 6:12, NIV).

Some NDEs may indeed be influenced or corrupted by demonic forces. The enemy’s strategy, as Dr. Miller notes, is “to present a more inclusive, less demanding ‘gospel’ that nullifies the cross and the need for a savior” (Miller, Chapter 8 outline). This explains why some of the most popular NDE accounts are precisely those that promote unbiblical messages—they appeal to our fallen nature’s desire for a costless salvation.

However, we must be careful not to attribute all NDEs to demonic activity. As the Catholic perspective notes: “The idea that NDE’s are ‘tricks of the Devil’ has very little foundation. NDE’s reveal a loving Christ, who encourages good moral action. NDE visits to Purgatory and Hell reveal them as places to be avoided” (A Catholic Understanding, Chapter on “After Effects”). The transformative power of many NDEs—leading people to greater faith, love, and service—suggests divine rather than demonic origin.

Part IV: The Deeper Theological Implications

Beyond the immediate questions of alignment and tension, NDEs raise profound theological questions that deserve our careful consideration. These experiences may be pressing us to think more deeply about aspects of our faith we’ve taken for granted.

The Nature of the Intermediate State

One of the most significant theological contributions of NDE research is the light it sheds on what theologians call the intermediate state—the condition of the soul between death and the final resurrection. This is an area where Scripture provides limited information, and NDEs may be filling in some details.

Traditional Christian theology has long debated whether souls “sleep” until the resurrection or experience conscious existence immediately after death. NDEs overwhelmingly support the latter view, which aligns with several biblical passages. Jesus told the thief on the cross, “Today you will be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:43, NIV)—not “today you will sleep until the resurrection.” Paul expressed his desire “to depart and be with Christ” (Philippians 1:23, NIV), suggesting immediate conscious fellowship.

Dr. Miller makes an important distinction that helps us understand NDEs theologically: “I’d consider the primary NDE/DBE experience to be an encounter, not with heaven as the throne-room of God, or even the final resting-place of the redeemed, but some type of vestibule or entryway to the ultimate afterlife” (Miller, Chapter 3). This “vestibule” concept helps explain why NDEs don’t always match biblical descriptions of the final state—they’re glimpses of the intermediate state, not the eternal state after the resurrection and judgment.

This understanding resolves many apparent contradictions. The beauty and peace of positive NDEs reflect the blessed state of believers in paradise awaiting the resurrection. The distressing NDEs may reflect the condition of the unrepentant in Hades, also awaiting final judgment. Neither represents the final heaven or hell described in Revelation, but rather temporary states that precede the final resurrection.

The Evidence for Substance Dualism

NDEs provide powerful empirical support for substance dualism—the biblical view that humans consist of both a material body and an immaterial soul or spirit. This stands in stark contrast to materialist philosophy, which claims consciousness is merely a product of brain activity.

Dr. Miller emphasizes the significance of veridical NDEs—cases where experiencers accurately report information they couldn’t have known through normal sensory channels. He cites cases such as “a patient accurately describing the location of their dentures, which were removed while they were comatose” and “cases of people blind from birth who ‘see’ and accurately describe their surroundings during an NDE” (Miller, Chapter 7 outline).

These veridical perceptions pose an insurmountable challenge to materialism. As Dr. Miller formulates the argument: “If consciousness can perceive verifiable information while the brain is clinically non-functional, then consciousness cannot be merely a product of the brain. It must be a separate entity (the soul)” (Miller, Chapter 7 outline). This provides what Miller calls “some of the strongest empirical evidence for the biblical view of human nature.”

Scripture clearly teaches this dualist view. Jesus said, “Do not be afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul” (Matthew 10:28, NIV), clearly distinguishing between body and soul. Paul speaks of being “away from the body and at home with the Lord” (2 Corinthians 5:8, NIV). NDEs provide contemporary evidence for what Scripture has always taught—that we are more than our physical bodies.

The Justice and Mercy of God

One of the most profound aspects of NDEs is how they reveal both God’s justice and His overwhelming mercy. The life review component shows that every action matters, that nothing is hidden from God’s sight, aligning with Ecclesiastes 12:14: “For God will bring every deed into judgment, including every hidden thing, whether it is good or evil” (NIV).

Yet the way judgment is experienced in NDEs—through self-evaluation in the presence of perfect love rather than external condemnation—reveals the deep mercy of God. Many experiencers report that while they became acutely aware of their failures and sins, they simultaneously experienced complete love and acceptance. This paradox actually reflects biblical truth. John writes, “There is no fear in love. But perfect love drives out fear, because fear has to do with punishment” (1 John 4:18, NIV).

Dr. Miller addresses a common misconception: “Some read this to mean that our sins don’t really matter to God. But experiencing God’s love while seeing our sins actually makes us more aware of how our sins grieve Him and hurt others” (Miller, Chapter 5). This aligns with Paul’s insight that “God’s kindness is intended to lead you to repentance” (Romans 2:4, NIV).

The presence of both positive and distressing NDEs also testifies to God’s justice. As the Catholic text notes: “NDE’s certainly testify to the existence of Hell, but put no limits on God’s ability or love” (A Catholic Understanding, Chapter on “Universal Salvation”). While God’s love is infinite, human freedom to reject that love is real, and some NDEs reflect the consequences of that rejection.

Part V: Practical Applications for Christian Life and Ministry

Understanding the relationship between NDEs and biblical truth isn’t merely an academic exercise. These insights have profound implications for how we live our faith and conduct our ministry.

Pastoral Care and Counseling

Pastors and counselors need to be prepared to minister to those who have had NDEs or death-bed experiences. Dr. Miller’s research reveals that these experiences are far more common than many realize, affecting “4-5% of the general population, 10% of cardiac arrest survivors” (Miller, Chapter 1 outline). In a congregation of 500 people, over 20 have likely had an NDE.

Too often, experiencers are met with skepticism or dismissal from religious leaders. Dr. Miller documents the frustration of experiencers: “With both his spiritual advisor (pastor) and scientific advisor (psychiatrist) refusing to take him seriously, where is he to find answers?” (Miller, cited from Osis and Haraldsson). This dismissal can drive people away from the church and toward New Age or occult interpretations of their experiences.

Instead, pastoral caregivers should:
– Listen with openness and respect
– Affirm the reality of spiritual experiences while maintaining biblical discernment
– Help experiencers interpret their experiences through a biblical lens
– Connect them with appropriate resources and support groups
– Use their experiences as opportunities for spiritual growth and evangelism

Evangelism and Apologetics

NDEs can be powerful tools in evangelism and apologetics, providing contemporary evidence for biblical truths about the afterlife. As Dr. Miller notes, they serve as “valuable ‘signposts’ that challenge materialism and open a door to spiritual conversations” (Miller, Chapter 12 outline).

In our increasingly secular age, many people dismiss the Bible as ancient mythology. But when confronted with thousands of contemporary accounts of people experiencing the afterlife, seeing deceased relatives, encountering divine beings, and undergoing profound life reviews, skeptics must grapple with evidence that transcends easy dismissal.

However, we must be careful to use NDEs appropriately in evangelism:
– Always ground our ultimate authority in Scripture, not experience
– Use NDEs as illustrations of biblical truth, not as independent sources of doctrine
– Focus on accounts that clearly align with biblical teaching
– Be honest about the tensions and the need for discernment
– Point people ultimately to Christ, not to experiences

Comfort for the Grieving

For those who have lost loved ones, biblical NDEs can provide tremendous comfort. The consistent testimony of experiencers that deceased believers are alive, aware, and in a state of joy aligns with Paul’s encouragement not to “grieve like the rest of mankind, who have no hope” (1 Thessalonians 4:13, NIV).

Death-bed visions, where dying patients see deceased relatives coming to escort them home, can transform the death experience for both the dying and their families. As one researcher noted: “Extraordinary beauty awaits us on the other side… ‘Oh, lovely, lovely,’ she said. I asked, ‘What is lovely?’ ‘What I see,’ she replied in low, intense tones” (Osis and Haraldsson, cited in Miller, Chapter 3).

These experiences don’t replace biblical hope but illustrate it in powerful, contemporary ways. They remind us that death is not the end but a transition, that our loved ones in Christ are more alive than ever, and that reunion awaits.

Spiritual Formation and Discipleship

The transformative effects of NDEs provide insights for spiritual formation. If a few moments in God’s presence can so radically transform values and priorities, what might extended time in God’s presence through prayer, worship, and meditation accomplish?

The elements of transformation consistently reported by NDEers—loss of fear, increased love, decreased materialism, enhanced purpose—are precisely the goals of Christian discipleship. NDEs remind us that these transformations aren’t just ideals but achievable realities when we truly encounter God.

Churches might consider:
– Teaching about the reality of the spiritual realm
– Emphasizing experiential knowledge of God alongside intellectual knowledge
– Creating space for people to share spiritual experiences
– Focusing on life transformation, not just information transfer
– Preparing people for their own death and eternal destiny

Ministry Application: Every church should have someone equipped to counsel those who have had NDEs or other profound spiritual experiences. These experiences are too common and too significant to ignore. Proper pastoral care can help experiencers integrate their experiences in biblically faithful ways while avoiding deception or confusion.

Part VI: Addressing Common Objections

Before we conclude, we must address the common objections raised against taking NDEs seriously from a Christian perspective. These objections, while often well-intentioned, sometimes reflect incomplete biblical understanding or hasty generalizations.

Objection 1: “The Bible Is Sufficient—We Don’t Need NDEs”

Some argue that since Scripture is sufficient for faith and practice (2 Timothy 3:16-17), we should ignore NDEs entirely. But this misunderstands the doctrine of biblical sufficiency. Dr. Miller addresses this effectively by examining how even conservative pastors like John MacArthur use extra-biblical evidence:

“According to MacArthur, ‘the complexity and diversity leave you with no other possible explanation than divine intelligence and divine power of proportions beyond our comprehension.’ And why not use scientific observations as evidence for God’s existence and vast wisdom? After all, Romans 1:20 states that we can understand God’s divine nature and power ‘through what has been made,’ not just through the Bible” (Miller, Chapter 4).

Scripture itself encourages us to learn from various sources. The Bible commands us to consider the ant (Proverbs 6:6), learn from nature (Psalm 19:1-2), and gain wisdom and knowledge generally (Proverbs 18:15). If we can learn about God from creation, why not from the testimonies of those who have glimpsed the afterlife?

The key is maintaining proper priority. Scripture remains our ultimate authority, the standard by which all experiences are judged. NDEs don’t replace Scripture but can illustrate and confirm its truths.

Objection 2: “NDEs Are Demonic Deceptions”

While some NDEs may indeed involve demonic deception (and we’ve acknowledged this danger), dismissing all NDEs as demonic is neither biblical nor logical. As the Catholic text notes: “The idea that NDE’s are ‘tricks of the Devil’ has very little foundation. NDE’s reveal a loving Christ, who encourages good moral action” (A Catholic Understanding).

Would Satan create experiences that:
– Lead people to increased prayer and Bible reading?
– Cause people to lose their fear of death and trust in God?
– Result in greater love, compassion, and service?
– Often feature encounters with Jesus Christ?
– Produce the fruit of the Spirit?

Jesus Himself warned against the fallacy of attributing God’s work to Satan: “Every kingdom divided against itself will be ruined, and every city or household divided against itself will not stand” (Matthew 12:25, NIV). If Satan is producing experiences that lead people to Christ and godly living, his kingdom cannot stand.

Objection 3: “Biblical Visions Were Frightening, NDEs Are Pleasant”

Critics argue that biblical encounters with the divine were terrifying, while NDEs are often pleasant, proving they’re not genuine. But this objection cherry-picks biblical evidence. Dr. Miller provides counter-examples:

“Stephen, in his vision of the very throne-room of God didn’t seem at all ‘frightened, hyper-aware of his own insignificance, deeply conscious of his guilt and fallenness.’ (Acts 7:54-60) Neither does the Apostle Paul mention his vision of ‘the third heaven’ provoking fear. (II Corinthians 12:1-6)” (Miller, Chapter 4).

Moreover, the difference in response may reflect the difference in situation. Old Testament theophanies often involved God appearing to deliver judgment or establish covenants—naturally inspiring awe and fear. NDEs typically involve believers being welcomed home or unbelievers being given merciful warnings—naturally inspiring joy or conviction rather than terror.

Objection 4: “NDEs Contradict the Finality of Death”

Some cite Hebrews 9:27 (“people are destined to die once, and after that to face judgment”) to argue that NDEs contradict Scripture by having people die multiple times. But this misunderstands both the passage and the nature of NDEs.

Dr. Miller clarifies: “Much like in English, the Greek word for ‘die’ can vary in meaning depending upon the context. In Hebrews 9 it obviously refers to a person’s ‘final death.’ If it meant ‘only once in life will people experience clinical death, in which their heart and respiration stop,’ then it would contradict every person’s experience who has been resuscitated from clinical death, as well as contradict many clear Scriptures” (Miller, Chapter 5).

The Bible itself records multiple people who died and were resurrected: Lazarus (John 11), Jairus’s daughter (Mark 5), the widow’s son (Luke 7), Tabitha (Acts 9), and others. These people obviously died twice—once temporarily and once finally. NDEs represent temporary death, not final death.

Synthesis: A Comprehensive Framework for Understanding

As we synthesize everything we’ve examined, a comprehensive framework emerges for understanding NDEs from a biblical perspective:

1. Recognition of Legitimate Spiritual Reality

NDEs represent genuine spiritual experiences in most cases. The convergence of thousands of independent accounts, the veridical perceptions, the transformative effects, and the alignment with biblical themes all point to real encounters with spiritual reality. To dismiss them all as hallucinations or fabrications requires more faith than accepting their basic validity.

2. Acknowledgment of Varied Sources and Influences

Not all NDEs come from the same source or remain uncorrupted. We must recognize at least four categories:

Divine NDEs: Genuine glimpses of spiritual reality permitted by God for purposes of warning, comfort, or transformation. These align with Scripture and produce godly fruit.

Corrupted NDEs: Experiences that begin as genuine but become contaminated by demonic influence or human misinterpretation. These mix truth with error and require careful discernment.

Deceptive NDEs: Experiences orchestrated by demonic forces to promote false theology. These contradict Scripture and lead people away from Christ.

Natural NDEs: Experiences produced by brain chemistry or psychology without supernatural involvement. These may reflect cultural expectations rather than spiritual reality.

3. Application of Biblical Discernment

Every NDE must be evaluated against Scripture using the three questions we outlined: What does it teach about Christ? What does it say about salvation? What fruit does it produce? This discernment isn’t optional but commanded: “Dear friends, do not believe every spirit, but test the spirits to see whether they are from God” (1 John 4:1, NIV).

4. Integration with Biblical Theology

Where NDEs align with Scripture, they can deepen our understanding of biblical truth. They provide experiential confirmation of:
– The reality of the soul and afterlife
– The nature of the intermediate state
– The justice and mercy of God
– The centrality of Christ
– The importance of how we live
– The reality of both heaven and hell

5. Maintenance of Proper Priorities

Scripture remains our ultimate authority. NDEs are, at best, illustrations of biblical truth, not sources of new doctrine. When experience contradicts Scripture, Scripture wins. Always.

The Summary Table: Alignments Between NDEs and Scripture

To crystallize our analysis, here’s a comprehensive table comparing common NDE elements with biblical teaching:

NDE Element Biblical Correlation Assessment
Being of Light identified as God/Christ “God is light” (1 John 1:5)
“I am the light of the world” (John 8:12)
Strong Alignment
Life Review with moral evaluation “Judgment seat of Christ” (2 Cor. 5:10)
“God will bring every deed into judgment” (Eccl. 12:14)
Strong Alignment
Beautiful heavenly realms New Jerusalem descriptions (Rev. 21)
“Paradise” (Luke 23:43)
Strong Alignment
Meeting deceased believers “Cloud of witnesses” (Heb. 12:1)
“To be absent from the body” (2 Cor. 5:8)
Strong Alignment
Out-of-body experience “Whether in the body or out” (2 Cor. 12:2)
Body/soul distinction (Matt. 10:28)
Strong Alignment
Overwhelming love and acceptance “God is love” (1 John 4:8)
“Nothing can separate us” (Rom. 8:38-39)
Alignment with caution – Must not negate need for salvation
Ineffability of experience “Inexpressible things” (2 Cor. 12:4)
“Eye has not seen” (1 Cor. 2:9)
Strong Alignment
Transformation of values “Fruit of the Spirit” (Gal. 5:22-23)
“By their fruits” (Matt. 7:16)
Strong Alignment
Distressing/hellish experiences Various hell descriptions (Matt. 25:41, Luke 16:23) Alignment – Confirms reality of judgment
Universalist messages “No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6) Contradiction – Red flag for deception
Second chances after death “Appointed once to die, then judgment” (Heb. 9:27) Tension – Requires careful interpretation
Absence of specific biblical imagery Various throne room descriptions (Isa. 6, Ezek. 1, Rev. 4) Neutral – Bible doesn’t claim exhaustive description

Conclusion: Walking the Narrow Path

As we conclude this extensive comparison of NDEs with biblical teaching, we find ourselves walking a narrow path between two ditches. On one side lies the ditch of uncritical acceptance, where every NDE is embraced as divine revelation without discernment. On the other side lies the ditch of wholesale rejection, where genuine spiritual experiences are dismissed as deception or delusion.

The biblical path acknowledges that we live in a universe where the spiritual realm is real and active. God can and does reveal Himself in various ways, including through experiences at the threshold of death. As the prophet Joel declared and Peter confirmed at Pentecost: “In the last days, God says, I will pour out my Spirit on all people. Your sons and daughters will prophesy, your young men will see visions, your old men will dream dreams” (Acts 2:17, NIV).

Yet we also live in a world where deception is real, where “Satan himself masquerades as an angel of light” (2 Corinthians 11:14, NIV), and where human perception and interpretation are fallible. This reality demands discernment, not dismissal; evaluation, not elimination.

The evidence suggests that many NDEs are genuine glimpses of the spiritual reality described in Scripture. They confirm the existence of the soul, the reality of the afterlife, the centrality of Christ, the importance of how we live, and the twin realities of heaven and hell. Where they align with Scripture, they provide powerful contemporary testimony to eternal truths.

But—and this is crucial—they also remind us of the enemy’s activity and the human tendency toward deception and misinterpretation. Some NDEs promote dangerous theological errors that must be rejected. The popularity of universalist NDE accounts should alarm us, not because all NDEs are false, but because it shows how eagerly people embrace experiences that tell them what they want to hear rather than what they need to hear.

Dr. Miller’s conclusion deserves emphasis: “The best NDEs point away from themselves and toward Christ. The final message is one of hope, not in the experiences, but in the resurrected Savior to whom they testify” (Miller, Chapter 12 outline). This is the key insight. NDEs are not the gospel, but when properly understood, they can point people to the gospel. They’re not the foundation of our faith, but they can confirm the faith once delivered to the saints.

As we process the phenomenon of NDEs, let us hold fast to several non-negotiable truths:

First, Scripture alone is our ultimate authority. No experience, no matter how powerful or transformative, can supersede God’s written Word. When push comes to shove, we stand on “Thus says the Lord,” not “Thus I experienced.”

Second, Christ alone is the way of salvation. Any NDE that suggests multiple paths to God or salvation apart from Christ must be rejected as false, regardless of how beautiful or compelling it seems. Jesus’ words remain absolute: “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me” (John 14:6, NIV).

Third, discernment is not optional. Every spiritual experience must be tested against Scripture. This isn’t skepticism; it’s obedience to the biblical command to “test everything; hold fast what is good” (1 Thessalonians 5:21, ESV).

Fourth, God is still active in our world. While maintaining biblical discernment, we must remain open to God’s continued activity in human experience. To deny that God can grant glimpses of eternity or use NDEs for His purposes is to put God in a box of our own making.

Finally, the ultimate proof of the afterlife is not found in NDEs but in the empty tomb. Jesus Christ didn’t have a near-death experience; He conquered death itself. His resurrection is the historical fact upon which our entire faith rests. NDEs may provide supporting evidence, but the resurrection provides proof.

As we move forward in our study and ministry, let us approach NDEs with what I call “critical openness”—open to what God may be doing through these experiences, but critical in our evaluation of their content and implications. Let us use them as bridges for evangelism, tools for comfort, and catalysts for spiritual conversation, always pointing beyond the experience to the Christ who is the author and perfecter of our faith.

The apostle Paul, who himself had an NDE-like experience of the third heaven, provides our final word. He refused to boast in his experience, choosing instead to boast in his weaknesses so that Christ’s power might rest on him (2 Corinthians 12:9). He pointed not to his experience but to Christ crucified and risen. This must be our approach as well. NDEs are fascinating, potentially faith-affirming, and deserving of serious consideration. But they are not our message. Christ is our message—Christ crucified, Christ risen, Christ returning, Christ who alone is “the way and the truth and the life.”

In the end, the most important question is not “What do NDEs tell us about the afterlife?” but “Are you ready to meet the Christ whom so many NDEers encounter?” For as Scripture solemnly reminds us, “it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment” (Hebrews 9:27, ESV). The glimpses of eternity provided by NDEs should drive us not to fascination with experiences but to faith in the Savior who holds eternity in His hands.

Let the final word be this: NDEs strongly suggest that the biblical worldview is true—that we are more than physical beings, that consciousness survives bodily death, that there is a God of light and love, that our actions matter eternally, and that Jesus Christ is central to it all. But knowing about the afterlife and being prepared for it are two different things. The message of both Scripture and the most biblically consistent NDEs is clear: Choose life. Choose Christ. Choose now. For in the end, eternity is too long to be wrong about Jesus.


Bibliography

Burke, John. Imagine Heaven: Near-Death Experiences, God’s Promises, and the Exhilarating Future That Awaits You. Grand Rapids: Baker Books, 2015.

Habermas, Gary, and J. P. Moreland. Beyond Death: Exploring the Evidence for Immortality. Eugene, Oregon: Wipf & Stock Publishers, 2004.

Ingraham, M. C. A Catholic Understanding of the Near Death Experience. Revised Edition. Self-published, 2016.

Long, Jeffrey, with Paul Perry. God and the Afterlife: The Groundbreaking New Evidence for God and Near-Death Experience. New York: HarperCollins, 2017.

MacArthur, John. The Glory of Heaven: The Truth about Heaven, Angels, and Eternal Life. Second Edition. Wheaton: Crossway, 2013.

Miller, J. Steve. Is Christianity Compatible With Deathbed and Near-Death Experiences? The Surprising Presence of Jesus, Scarcity of Anti-Christian Elements, And Compatibility with Historic Christian Teachings. Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2024.

Miller, J. Steve. Near-Death Experiences as Evidence for the Existence of God and Heaven: A Brief Introduction in Plain Language. Acworth, GA: Wisdom Creek Press, 2012.

Moody, Raymond. Life After Life: The Bestselling Original Investigation That Revealed Near-Death Experiences. 40th Anniversary Edition. New York: HarperOne, 2015.

Ritchie, George G. Return from Tomorrow. Grand Rapids: Chosen Books, 1978.

Sabom, Michael. Light & Death: One Doctor’s Fascinating Account of Near-Death Experiences. Grand Rapids: Zondervan Publishing House, 1998.

Sartori, Penny. The Near-Death Experiences of Hospitalized Intensive Care Patients: A Five-Year Clinical Study. New York: The Edwin Mellen Press, 2008.

Van Lommel, Pim. Consciousness Beyond Life: The Science of the Near-Death Experience. New York: HarperOne, 2010.

Zaleski, Carol. Otherworld Journeys: Accounts of Near-Death Experience in Medieval and Modern Times. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.

© 2025, LearnTheology.com. All rights reserved.

css.php