Part IV: The Biblical Evidence — God's Emotions in Scripture
Chapter 11
The God Who Feels
We have now arrived at the heart of this book. In the previous ten chapters, we laid the groundwork — defining emotions, surveying the three major positions in the passibility/impassibility debate, tracing the history of the discussion from the Church Fathers through today, and examining the contemporary evangelical landscape. All of that work was building toward this moment. Starting here, and continuing through Chapter 21, we are going to open our Bibles and listen to what God Himself says about His own emotional life.
And the evidence is overwhelming.
That is the thesis of this chapter: A comprehensive survey of the biblical data reveals that God is portrayed throughout Scripture as a deeply emotional being whose feelings are genuine, varied, purposeful, and always connected to His love for His creatures. This is not a claim based on a handful of isolated proof texts. It is a claim based on hundreds and hundreds of passages — spread across every genre, every biblical period, and every section of the canon — that describe a God who loves and hates, who rejoices and grieves, who burns with righteous anger and overflows with tender compassion, who is jealous for His people and patient beyond measure with their failures.
Think about that for a moment. We are not talking about three or four verses that might be explained away as mere figures of speech. We are talking about over four hundred passages in the Old Testament alone that describe God's anger.1 We are talking about the word hesed (חֶסֶד) — God's steadfast, covenant love — appearing nearly 250 times in the Hebrew Bible.2 We are talking about every major section of Scripture — Torah, Prophets, Writings, Gospels, Epistles, and Revelation — presenting God as a passionately engaged, emotionally responsive being.
I find the sheer volume of this evidence absolutely staggering. And I believe it places the burden of proof squarely on anyone who would claim that all of this emotional language is "merely metaphorical" or "merely anthropomorphic." As we argued in Chapter 6, when the entire Bible — across centuries, multiple human authors, and diverse literary genres — describes God in richly emotional terms, we need very strong reasons to dismiss all of it as figurative. And as we will see, those reasons simply do not hold up.
This chapter serves as a map. Before we dive deep into individual emotions in the chapters that follow (Chapters 12 through 21), we need to step back and see the big picture. We need to feel the cumulative weight of what Scripture says about the emotional life of God. Once we do, I believe two things will become clear. First, the God of the Bible is anything but an unmoved, unfeeling, emotionally detached deity. Second, this God's emotions are always purposeful, always righteous, and always flowing from His deep love for His creatures. He feels — but He is never out of control. He is moved — but never manipulated. He grieves — but is never incapacitated. That is the mediating position this book defends, and the biblical evidence supports it powerfully.
Chapter Thesis: A comprehensive survey of the biblical data reveals that God is portrayed throughout Scripture as a deeply emotional being whose feelings are genuine, varied, purposeful, and always connected to His love for His creatures. From Genesis to Revelation, across every literary genre and historical period, the God of the Bible loves, grieves, rejoices, burns with anger, overflows with compassion, and responds emotionally to His creatures.
Where do we begin with such an enormous body of evidence? David Lamb provides a helpful framework. In his study of divine emotions in Scripture, Lamb identifies seven emotions that are most frequently associated with God in the Bible: hate, anger, jealousy, sorrow, joy, compassion, and love.3 These seven form the backbone of the biblical portrait of God's emotional life, and each will receive its own dedicated chapter later in this book.
What makes Lamb's framework especially helpful is how it highlights a surprising tension. Three of these seven emotions — hatred, anger, and jealousy — are listed by the apostle Paul as "works of the flesh" in Galatians 5:19–21. Paul uses the Greek terms echthra (enmity or hatred), thymos (fits of anger), and zēlos (jealousy) — and warns believers against all of them. Yet the Bible attributes all three of these emotions to God Himself. God hates (Psalm 5:5). God gets angry (Psalm 78:21). God is jealous (Exodus 34:14).4 How do we make sense of this? How can emotions that are "works of the flesh" in us be morally perfect in God?
The answer is both simple and profound. When these emotions appear in fallen human beings, they are typically selfish, irrational, and destructive. Human hatred is often petty and vindictive. Human anger is often explosive and disproportionate. Human jealousy is often rooted in insecurity and possessiveness. But God's versions of these same emotions are morally flawless. God's hatred is always directed at genuine evil — at the things that destroy the people He loves. God's anger is always righteous, measured, patient, and aimed at redemption. God's jealousy is the fierce protective love of a faithful husband who refuses to share His beloved with rivals. The emotion itself is not the problem; the quality and direction of the emotion is everything.
On the other side of Paul's list, we find the "fruit of the Spirit" in Galatians 5:22–23: "love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control." Notice something remarkable about this list. Many of these fruits are themselves emotional states — love, joy, patience, kindness. They are not merely behaviors to perform; they are dispositions of the heart, affective qualities that characterize a person from the inside out. And they come from the Spirit — that is, they reflect the character of God Himself. The Spirit's work in believers is to cultivate divine-quality emotions in us.5 We are being formed into the emotional image of God.
This is a stunning implication. If the fruit of the Spirit reflects God's own character, and the fruit of the Spirit includes love, joy, and patience, then God Himself experiences love, joy, and patience. The Holy Spirit is not cultivating in us something foreign to God's own nature. He is reproducing in us what already exists perfectly in God. As we will explore further in Chapter 21 on the emotional life of the Holy Spirit, the Spirit can be "grieved" (Ephesians 4:30) and "quenched" (1 Thessalonians 5:19) — further confirming that the third Person of the Trinity is not emotionally inert.
Key Insight: Some emotions Paul calls "works of the flesh" — hatred, anger, jealousy — are also attributed to God in Scripture. But God's versions of these emotions are always morally perfect, never sinful. Meanwhile, the "fruit of the Spirit" — love, joy, peace, patience — are themselves emotional states that reflect God's own character. The Spirit's work is to cultivate divine-quality emotions in believers.
Before we survey the biblical terrain section by section, I want to note something about how these seven emotions relate to each other. They are not seven disconnected feelings that God experiences in isolation. They are deeply interconnected — and love is the thread that ties them all together. God hates because He loves (He hates what destroys those He loves). God is angry because He loves (injustice enrages Him because it harms the beloved). God is jealous because He loves (He will not tolerate rivals who steal the affection of His people). God grieves because He loves (the suffering and rebellion of His children genuinely wounds Him). God rejoices because He loves (His love finds its deepest delight in the flourishing of His creatures). God shows compassion because He loves (He feels the pain of His children in His own heart). Love, as we will argue in Chapter 12, is the foundation of all divine emotion.6
The emotional life of God is on display from the very first pages of Scripture. In the Torah — the first five books of the Bible — we encounter a God who creates with delight, loves with fierce commitment, grieves over human wickedness, burns with anger at rebellion, and jealously guards His covenant relationship with His people.
It begins with joy. When God creates the world in Genesis 1, He repeatedly looks at what He has made and declares it tov (טוֹב) — "good." And when creation is complete, with humanity bearing His image, God surveys the whole of it and calls it "very good" (Genesis 1:31). This is not a cold, clinical quality assessment. The word tov carries connotations of delight, pleasure, and aesthetic satisfaction.7 God is pleased with what He has made. He delights in it. Creation is an act of joyful self-expression by a God who overflows with creative energy and takes pleasure in His handiwork. We will explore God's joy in depth in Chapter 14, but it is worth noting that the very first emotion we encounter in Scripture is divine delight.
But the delight does not last long. By Genesis 6, human wickedness has so corrupted the earth that we encounter one of the most emotionally intense verses in the entire Bible:
"The LORD saw that the wickedness of man was great in the earth, and that every intention of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually. And the LORD regretted that he had made man on the earth, and it grieved him to his heart." (Genesis 6:5–6, ESV)
Two Hebrew words converge here to paint a picture of profound divine anguish. The word translated "regretted" is nacham (נחם), which can mean to be sorry, to grieve, or to relent. The word translated "grieved" is 'atsav (עָצַב), which means to be pained, to be hurt, to be wounded. The text says this grief reached God's heart — the Hebrew word lev (לֵב), which in biblical usage is the seat of the emotions, the will, and the intellect.8 This is not the language of a detached, unmoved observer. This is the language of a God whose heart is breaking. We will treat this passage in full depth in Chapter 15, but even in overview we can see that the Torah presents God's grief as genuine and devastating.
The Torah also reveals God's anger in powerful terms. In Exodus 4:14, when Moses keeps making excuses at the burning bush, we read that "the anger of the LORD was kindled against Moses." The Hebrew phrase yikhar-'aph (וַיִּחַר־אַף) literally means "the nostril burned" — a vivid, bodily metaphor for the heat and intensity of anger.9 Later, after the people worship the golden calf in Exodus 32, God's anger erupts even more intensely. He tells Moses, "Now therefore let me alone, that my wrath may burn hot against them" (Exodus 32:10, ESV). This anger is not arbitrary or capricious. It is the righteous response of a faithful God whose people have shattered their covenant with Him by running after an idol. Chapter 16 will explore divine anger in detail.
God's jealousy also features prominently in the Torah. In one of the most remarkable statements in all of Scripture, God declares that jealousy is so central to His identity that it is actually one of His names: "You shall worship no other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God" (Exodus 34:14, ESV). The Hebrew word is qanna' (קַנָּא), meaning jealous or zealous. This is not the petty jealousy of insecurity. It is the fierce, protective love of a husband who will not share his bride with another. Chapter 17 will explore this in depth.
And throughout the Torah, God's love undergirds everything. In Deuteronomy 7:7–8, Moses tells Israel that God chose them not because of their greatness but because of His love: "It was not because you were more in number than any other people that the LORD set his love on you and chose you, for you were the fewest of all peoples, but it is because the LORD loves you" (ESV). Three different Hebrew words for love appear in this short passage — hashaq (חָשַׁק), a word meaning passionate attachment; 'ahav (אָהַב), the most common word for love; and hesed (חֶסֶד), covenant faithfulness.10 Chapter 12 will explore all three in full.
We should also note that the Torah reveals God's patience — His willingness to bear with His people's failures rather than destroying them immediately. In Exodus 34:6–7, God reveals His own name and character to Moses in what many scholars consider the single most important theological statement in the Old Testament: "The LORD, the LORD, a God merciful and gracious, slow to anger, and abounding in steadfast love and faithfulness, keeping steadfast love for thousands, forgiving iniquity and transgression and sin" (ESV). The Hebrew phrase translated "slow to anger" is 'erek 'appayim (אֶרֶךְ אַפָּיִם), which literally means "long of nostrils." If anger is pictured as flaring nostrils and heavy breathing, then patience is pictured as having a very long nose — it takes a long time for the heat to reach the tip. God's anger is real, but it is slow to arrive. His patience is not indifference; it is the active, emotionally engaged decision to hold back judgment in the hope that the beloved will repent. Chapter 19 will explore divine patience fully.
Wayne Grudem helpfully summarizes the range of divine-emotion evidence, noting that God "rejoices (Isa. 62:5). He is grieved (Ps. 78:40; Eph. 4:30). His wrath burns hot against his enemies (Ex. 32:10). He pities his children (Ps. 103:13). He loves with everlasting love (Isa. 54:8; Ps. 103:17)."36 Additionally, Scripture portrays God as jealous (Exodus 20:5; 34:14; Zechariah 1:14) and compassionate (Psalm 103:8; Jeremiah 3:12). The biblical portrayal of divine emotion is both powerful and pervasive. As Lister observes, one simply cannot read Scripture and come away concluding that God is affectionless.
The Torah, then, gives us a God who is anything but emotionless. He delights, He grieves, He burns with anger, He loves with fierce devotion, He jealously guards the covenant bond with His people, and He patiently bears with their failures. This is not merely background noise. It is the theological foundation for everything that follows in the rest of Scripture.
If the Torah introduces us to God's emotional life, the Prophets amplify it to a thundering crescendo. The prophetic literature is, without question, the most emotionally intense material in the entire Bible. Here God does not merely feel — He pours out His heart through the mouths of His prophets in language that is raw, passionate, and at times almost overwhelming.
Abraham Heschel captured this brilliantly in his landmark work The Prophets. Heschel argued that the central insight of prophetic theology is what he called "divine pathos" — the conviction that God is not self-contained perfection, unmoved and unaffected, but is passionately and intimately involved with His creation. The God of the prophets is not the Unmoved Mover of Aristotle. He is a God who is deeply and personally affected by human actions.11 For Heschel, the prophet is not merely a messenger who delivers God's words. The prophet is someone who enters into God's own emotional experience — who feels what God feels, who sees the world through God's eyes, and who burns with God's own passion for justice and compassion. The prophet, Heschel argued, is a "witness to the divine pathos."12
Consider Hosea. The book of Hosea is essentially a sustained metaphor in which God compares His relationship with Israel to a marriage — and Israel has committed adultery. God is the faithful husband; Israel is the unfaithful wife who has run after other lovers (other gods). The emotional language is extraordinary. In Hosea 2:14–15, God speaks like a heartbroken husband who still wants to win back his wife: "Therefore, behold, I will allure her, and bring her into the wilderness, and speak tenderly to her" (ESV). The phrase "speak tenderly to her" is literally "speak upon her heart" ('al-libbah) — intimate, wooing language that drips with emotional longing.
Then in Hosea 11, the metaphor shifts from marriage to parenthood, and the emotional intensity rises even further. God speaks as a grieving parent looking back on raising a rebellious child:
"When Israel was a child, I loved him, and out of Egypt I called my son. The more they were called, the more they went away; they kept sacrificing to the Baals and burning offerings to idols. Yet it was I who taught Ephraim to walk; I took them up by their arms, but they did not know that I healed them. I led them with cords of kindness, with the bands of love, and I became to them as one who eases the yoke on their jaws, and I bent down to them and fed them." (Hosea 11:1–4, ESV)
This is astonishingly tender language. God remembers teaching Israel to walk, like a parent bending down to help a toddler take her first steps. He remembers holding them in His arms, easing their burdens, bending down to feed them. And yet they turned away. The emotional climax comes in verse 8, one of the most emotionally raw passages about God anywhere in Scripture: "How can I give you up, O Ephraim? How can I hand you over, O Israel? ... My heart recoils within me; my compassion grows warm and tender" (ESV). The Hebrew word haphak (הָפַךְ), translated "recoils," literally means to overturn or turn upside down. God's heart is being turned inside out by the prospect of judging His own children.13 This is emphatically not the language of a God in undisturbed bliss. Chapter 15 will treat this passage in full.
Jeremiah — the so-called "weeping prophet" — gives us another window into divine grief. In Jeremiah 8:18–9:1, the voice speaking shifts between the prophet and God in a way that scholars have found deliberately ambiguous. The result is a passage where it becomes impossible to tell where Jeremiah's grief ends and God's begins:
"My joy is gone; grief is upon me; my heart is sick within me. ... Is the LORD not in Zion? Is her King not in her? ... Oh that my head were waters, and my eyes a fountain of tears, that I might weep day and night for the slain of the daughter of my people!" (Jeremiah 8:18–19; 9:1, ESV)
Walter Brueggemann has argued that this blending of prophetic and divine voice is intentional — that the prophet's tears are an echo of God's own tears, and that Jeremiah's grief is itself a participation in the grief of God.14 Terence Fretheim makes a similar case, arguing that throughout the Old Testament, God's suffering is not merely metaphorical but describes a genuine divine experience of pain, grief, and anguish over the condition of His people and His world.15
But the Prophets do not only present a grieving God. They also present a God who roars with righteous anger. Amos 1:2 declares, "The LORD roars from Zion and utters his voice from Jerusalem" (ESV). The verb "roars" (yish'ag, יִשְׁאַג) is the same word used for a lion roaring — a terrifying, visceral image of divine fury unleashed against injustice. Throughout the book of Amos, God's anger is consistently provoked by specific social evils: the exploitation of the poor, the perversion of justice, the corruption of the courts, and the complacency of the wealthy. This is not capricious anger. It is the morally perfect fury of a God who cares passionately about justice.
The prophet Nahum opens his book with a description of God's anger that borders on terrifying: "The LORD is a jealous and avenging God; the LORD is avenging and wrathful; the LORD takes vengeance on his adversaries and keeps wrath for his enemies. The LORD is slow to anger and great in power, and the LORD will by no means clear the guilty" (Nahum 1:2–3, ESV). Notice the qualifier tucked into this fierce declaration: "slow to anger." Even in the most intense descriptions of divine wrath, the Prophets always remind us that God's anger is patient, measured, and purposeful.
Isaiah adds still another dimension to the portrait. In Isaiah 63:9, the prophet declares: "In all their affliction he was afflicted, and the angel of his presence saved them; in his love and in his pity he redeemed them; he lifted them up and carried them all the days of old" (ESV). This is a striking statement of divine co-suffering — God does not merely observe His people's affliction from a distance but shares in it, is personally affected by it, and responds with saving action. Isaiah 63:10 goes on to describe how Israel "rebelled and grieved his Holy Spirit" — using the same language of grief ('atsav) that appeared in Genesis 6:6.37 The prophetic witness is unanimous: God genuinely feels.
And the Prophets also give us some of the most beautiful expressions of divine joy in all of Scripture. Zephaniah 3:17 is breathtaking:
"The LORD your God is in your midst, a mighty one who will save; he will rejoice over you with gladness; he will quiet you by his love; he will exult over you with loud singing." (Zephaniah 3:17, ESV)
Picture this: the God of the universe — the Creator of galaxies and quasars and the depths of the sea — singing over His people with joy. The Hebrew word translated "exult" is yagil (יָגִיל), from gil (גִּיל), which means to spin around in delight, to dance with joy.16 God does not merely approve of His people from a distance. He sings and dances over them. This is not the portrait of an unmoved deity. Chapter 14 will explore God's joy at greater length.
The Prophets and Divine Pathos: Abraham Heschel argued that the central insight of the Hebrew prophets is "divine pathos" — the conviction that God is not self-contained perfection but is passionately and personally affected by human actions. The prophet is a witness to God's own emotional experience: God's grief over sin, anger at injustice, and relentless love for His people.
The third major section of the Hebrew Bible — the Writings, or Ketuvim (כְּתוּבִים) — includes the Psalms, Proverbs, Job, Ecclesiastes, Song of Solomon, and several other books. Of these, the Psalms are by far the richest source of divine-emotion language. As Lamb observes, the Psalms serve as a kind of window into God's emotional life, revealing the full range of His affective experience in concentrated, poetic form.17
Consider what the Psalms tell us about God's emotional life. The evidence is remarkably diverse:
God hates: "The LORD tests the righteous, but his soul hates the wicked and the one who loves violence" (Psalm 11:5, ESV).
God gets angry: "Then the anger of the LORD was kindled against his people, and he abhorred his heritage" (Psalm 106:40, ESV).
God is jealous: "How long, O LORD? Will you be angry forever? Will your jealousy burn like fire?" (Psalm 79:5, ESV).
God is grieved: "How often they rebelled against him in the wilderness and grieved him in the desert!" (Psalm 78:40, ESV).
God delights: "For the LORD takes pleasure in his people; he adorns the humble with salvation" (Psalm 149:4, ESV).
God shows mercy: "The LORD is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love" (Psalm 103:8, ESV).
God loves: "The LORD loves the righteous" (Psalm 146:8, ESV).
All seven of the emotions we are focusing on — hate, anger, jealousy, sorrow, joy, compassion, and love — appear in the Psalms. And they often appear in close proximity, sometimes within the very same psalm. This matters because it shows us that God's emotional life is complex, not simplistic. He does not experience one emotion at a time in neat isolation. His love and anger can coexist. His grief and hope can intermingle. His patience and righteous indignation can operate simultaneously. This complexity reflects the richness and depth of a personal God who engages the full range of creaturely experience.18
Lamb highlights Psalm 69 as a particularly powerful example, noting that it is one of the few psalms that mentions all seven of the divine emotions covered in his study.19 In this psalm, the psalmist appeals to God's love (hesed, v. 13) and mercy (rahamim, v. 16), mentions that God will be pleased (yatav, v. 31) with praise, and calls upon God to pour out His wrath (za'am) and fierce anger (haron 'aph) on his enemies (v. 24). The psalmist's own zeal (v. 9) and sorrow (v. 10) mirror divine emotions. What is particularly striking is that the New Testament quotes Psalm 69 multiple times and connects it directly to Jesus — meaning that the early church saw no tension between this intensely emotional psalm and the character of God incarnate.20
The title of the book of Psalms in Hebrew is Tehillim (תְּהִלִּים), which means "Praises." It is a book designed for worship — to be sung, shouted, and prayed aloud in the community of faith. And what this book of praise reveals about God is that He is deeply, passionately, unashamedly emotional. The Psalms teach us that God's emotions are not something to be embarrassed about or explained away. They are to be praised, celebrated, and responded to in worship.
The book of Proverbs adds another dimension by telling us specifically what God hates. Proverbs 6:16–19 lists seven things that are an "abomination" (to'evah, תּוֹעֵבָה) to the LORD: haughty eyes, a lying tongue, hands that shed innocent blood, a heart that devises wicked plans, feet that run to evil, a false witness, and one who sows discord among brothers. Notice the intensity of the language — these are not things God merely disapproves of or dislikes. They are things He abhors, things that provoke His moral revulsion. This kind of language is impossible to reconcile with strict impassibility. Chapter 18 will treat God's hatred in depth.
When we turn to the Gospels, the emotional life of God takes on flesh and blood in the person of Jesus Christ. If "whoever has seen me has seen the Father" (John 14:9, ESV) — and I believe those words with my whole heart — then the emotions of Jesus are a window into the emotions of God Himself.
And Jesus is intensely, deeply, unmistakably emotional.
He weeps at the tomb of His friend Lazarus (John 11:35). He is "moved with compassion" (splanchnizomai, σπλαγχνίζομαι) for the crowds who are "like sheep without a shepherd" (Matthew 9:36; Mark 6:34). He looks at the rich young man and "loves" him (Mark 10:21). He burns with righteous anger when He drives the money changers from the temple (John 2:13–17). He "rejoices in the Holy Spirit" (Luke 10:21). He weeps over Jerusalem's coming destruction (Luke 19:41–44). He is "deeply distressed and troubled" in Gethsemane, telling His disciples, "My soul is very sorrowful, even to death" (Mark 14:33–34, ESV).
Chapter 20 will explore the emotions of Jesus in full depth, so I will only make two observations here. First, Jesus' emotional life was extraordinarily rich and varied. He experienced the full spectrum of human emotion — not in a muted or detached way, but with striking intensity. Second, a common but misleading approach treats Jesus' emotions as belonging only to His human nature, as if He puts on a "human hat" when He weeps and a "divine hat" when He heals. But this is a serious misunderstanding of Chalcedonian Christology (the creedal teaching that Jesus is one Person with two natures). Jesus is always fully divine and fully human — the "Dual-Hatted Messiah," as Lamb puts it.21 When Jesus weeps, it is the eternal Son of God who weeps. His emotions reveal the heart of God, not merely the feelings of a human being. As we argued in the companion volume The Incarnation and the Soul: Why Physicalism Fails the Christ of the Creeds, Christ's human emotions require a genuine human soul — and those emotions reveal the heart of God precisely because the divine Person of the Son experienced them through His complete human nature.
The New Testament letters continue to portray God in richly emotional terms. Several themes stand out.
First, the love of God is absolutely central to the apostolic message. Paul writes in Romans 5:8, "But God shows his love for us in that while we were still sinners, Christ died for us" (ESV). The word "shows" (synistēsin, συνίστησιν) means to demonstrate, to prove, to commend. God's love is not merely an abstract attribute — it is demonstrated, put on display, proven through the concrete historical act of sending His Son to die. John takes this even further: "God is love" (1 John 4:8, 16). Love is not merely something God does; it is who God is. If love requires genuine emotional engagement — and I believe it does, as Chapter 22 will argue — then God's very being is emotional.
Second, the Epistles reveal that the Holy Spirit can be grieved. Paul writes in Ephesians 4:30, "And do not grieve the Holy Spirit of God, by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption" (ESV). The Greek word is lypeō (λυπέω), which means to cause sorrow, to cause pain, to distress. This is the same word used to describe the sorrow of Jesus in Gethsemane (Matthew 26:37). Paul is saying that the Holy Spirit — the third Person of the Trinity — can be genuinely hurt, genuinely saddened, by the sinful behavior of believers. This is a stunning affirmation of divine passibility. The Spirit is not indifferent to how we live. Our actions genuinely affect Him.22 Chapter 21 will explore the emotional life of the Holy Spirit at length.
Third, Paul speaks of God's kindness (chrēstotēs, χρηστότης) as having an emotional dimension that leads to repentance: "Or do you presume on the riches of his kindness and forbearance and patience, not knowing that God's kindness is meant to lead you to repentance?" (Romans 2:4, ESV). God's patience and kindness are not passive qualities. They are active, purposeful, emotionally engaged responses to human sin that are designed to draw people back to Himself. Chapter 19 will explore God's patience in detail.
Fourth, the author of Hebrews tells us that Jesus endured the cross "for the joy that was set before him" (Hebrews 12:2, ESV). Even in the darkest moment of human history — the crucifixion of the Son of God — joy was present. Not a superficial happiness, but a deep, forward-looking joy in the redemption that the cross would accomplish. God does not suffer without purpose; His grief and His joy are intertwined.
D. A. Carson, in his important study The Difficult Doctrine of the Love of God, distinguishes five different ways the Bible speaks of God's love — including His intra-Trinitarian love, His providential love for all creation, His salvific love extended to the world, His particular love for the elect, and His conditional love that approves of obedience. Each of these dimensions has emotional content that resists reduction to mere decision or volition. When God loves in any of these senses, He is engaged not merely in an act of will but in an act of the whole divine being — including genuine affective engagement with the objects of His love.39 The broader theological framework that emerges from the Epistles, taken as a whole, is one in which God's emotional engagement with His people is assumed rather than argued for — it is the unquestioned backdrop against which the entire drama of redemption unfolds.38
The final book of the Bible brings the emotional story of God to its climactic conclusion. Revelation presents the full range of divine emotion in eschatological terms — emotion directed toward the final resolution of history.
There is divine wrath: "They called to the mountains and rocks, 'Fall on us and hide us from the face of him who is seated on the throne, and from the wrath of the Lamb, for the great day of their wrath has come, and who can stand?'" (Revelation 6:16–17, ESV). The phrase "the wrath of the Lamb" is deliberately shocking. A lamb is gentle, meek, submissive — yet this Lamb's wrath causes kings and generals to cower in terror. The juxtaposition reveals that God's anger is never separated from His sacrificial love. The same Lamb who was slain for the sins of the world is also the Lamb whose wrath falls upon unrepentant evil.
There is divine joy: "Let us rejoice and exult and give him the glory, for the marriage of the Lamb has come, and his Bride has made herself ready" (Revelation 19:7, ESV). The wedding supper of the Lamb is a scene of ecstatic, overflowing joy — God and His redeemed people united forever in celebration.
And there is divine tenderness: "He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away" (Revelation 21:4, ESV). This is one of the most emotionally powerful verses in the entire Bible. God does not merely decree the end of suffering from a distance. He personally, tenderly, intimately wipes the tears from the faces of His children. This is the act of a parent comforting a weeping child — a deeply emotional, deeply personal gesture of love and care.
Revelation, then, shows us that God's emotional life is not temporary or merely a feature of His interaction with a fallen world. Emotion is part of who God is, and it will characterize His relationship with His people forever — though in the new creation, the painful emotions (grief, anger, sorrow) will give way entirely to joy, love, and delight.
From Genesis to Revelation: The emotional life of God is not confined to one section of Scripture or one literary genre. From the delight of creation (Genesis 1) to the tender wiping away of tears (Revelation 21:4), God's emotional engagement with His creatures runs like a golden thread through the entire biblical narrative. This is not a marginal theme — it is one of the most pervasive and prominent features of the biblical portrait of God.
We have already touched on the Psalms, but they deserve a closer look. Lamb is right to call the Psalms a "window" into the emotional life of God, and I want to develop that insight further.23
What makes the Psalms uniquely valuable for understanding divine emotions is their genre. The Psalms are prayers and songs — they are addressed to God. They are not systematic theology textbooks. They are raw, unfiltered, passionate expressions of faith that assume a deeply personal, emotionally engaged relationship between the worshiper and God. And within these prayers, God Himself is constantly described in emotional terms.
The Psalms are also the most quoted Old Testament book in the New Testament, suggesting that the early church found their emotional portrait of God not only compatible with their faith in Christ but essential to it.24
Consider Psalm 78, which is a lengthy retelling of Israel's history — and a remarkable window into the complexity of God's emotional life. Within this single psalm, we see God getting angry (v. 21: "when the LORD heard, he was full of wrath; a fire was kindled against Jacob"), being grieved (v. 40: "How often they rebelled against him in the wilderness and grieved him in the desert!"), provoking jealousy (v. 58: "they provoked him to anger with their high places; they moved him to jealousy with their idols"), showing compassion (v. 38: "Yet he, being compassionate, atoned for their iniquity and did not destroy them; he restrained his anger often and did not stir up all his wrath"), and acting out of love for His chosen servant David (vv. 70–72). In a single psalm, we see anger, grief, jealousy, compassion, patience, and love — all swirling together in the complex emotional life of a God who is deeply invested in His people's story.
This complexity is important. It shows us that God's emotions are not one-dimensional. He does not feel one thing at a time in neat, sequential order. He can be simultaneously angry at sin and compassionate toward the sinner. He can be grieved by rebellion and patient in His response. He can be jealous for His people's exclusive loyalty and loving in His pursuit of their restoration. This is the emotional life of a being of infinite depth and perfect moral character — and it is far richer and more nuanced than any simplistic caricature of either an "angry God" or a "nice God" could capture.
Psalm 103 offers perhaps the Bible's most sustained meditation on God's emotional tenderness. David writes, "The LORD is merciful and gracious, slow to anger and abounding in steadfast love" (Psalm 103:8, ESV) — a direct echo of God's self-revelation in Exodus 34:6. He continues with a deeply moving parental image: "As a father shows compassion to his children, so the LORD shows compassion to those who fear him. For he knows our frame; he remembers that we are dust" (Psalm 103:13–14, ESV). God's compassion is not abstract. It is the compassion of a parent who knows how fragile his children are — who remembers that we are made of dust — and who responds with tenderness rather than harshness. This will be explored in Chapter 13 on divine compassion.
At this point, I want to briefly acknowledge the primary objection that classical impassibilists bring against the kind of evidence we have been surveying. The objection goes like this: all of this emotional language is "anthropomorphic" or "anthropopathic" — that is, it describes God in human terms for our benefit, but it does not correspond to anything real in God's actual experience. God does not really grieve. He does not really get angry. He does not really feel compassion. These are just accommodations to our limited human understanding.
We addressed this objection in depth in Chapter 6, and I will not repeat the full argument here. But I do want to make three brief points in the context of the evidence we have surveyed.
First, the sheer volume and consistency of the evidence makes the "merely figurative" explanation extraordinarily difficult to sustain. We are not talking about a few isolated metaphors. We are talking about hundreds of passages across every genre and period of Scripture. If every single one of these passages is purely figurative with no referent in God's actual experience, then the Bible is systematically misleading us about who God is. That is a very heavy theological price to pay.
Second, many of these emotional descriptions appear in contexts where they are doing crucial theological work. God's grief in Genesis 6 is the motivation for the flood. God's anger in Exodus 32 is the context for Moses' intercession. God's compassion in Jonah 4:2 is the reason He relents from judgment. God's love in John 3:16 is the reason He sends His Son. If these emotions are not real, the theological logic of these passages collapses.25
Third, I believe the analogy runs upward, not downward. When Scripture says God grieves, it is pointing to a reality in God that is greater than human grief, not lesser. God's grief is not a watered-down version of our grief. Our grief is a dim reflection of His. The biblical analogy is saying: "You know that feeling of heartbreak you experience when someone you love destroys their life? God experiences something like that — only infinitely deeper, infinitely purer, and infinitely more real."26
As Rob Lister rightly observes, the Bible never directly asserts the metaphysical doctrine of impassibility. What it does assert is what Lister calls "divine invulnerability" — that God cannot be manipulated, overcome, or destabilized by anything outside Himself.27 But invulnerability is not the same thing as emotionlessness. A God who is invulnerable but also genuinely emotional — who feels deeply but is never overwhelmed by His feelings — is precisely the God we encounter in Scripture. That is the mediating position this book defends.
Analogy Runs Upward: When the Bible says God grieves, it is not reducing God to our level. It is pointing upward to a reality in God that is greater and purer than anything we experience. Our grief is a dim reflection of God's grief — not the other way around. The emotional language of Scripture is analogical, but the analogy points to something genuinely real in God's experience, not to something merely figurative.
One of the most important observations we can make about divine emotions in Scripture is that they are never random, capricious, or purposeless. Every emotion God expresses is connected to His moral character and directed toward redemptive ends.
God's anger is always a response to genuine evil — to idolatry, injustice, oppression, and covenant unfaithfulness. It is never arbitrary or moody. God's grief is always a response to the suffering and rebellion of His creatures — it is the heartbreak of a loving Father watching His children destroy themselves. God's joy is always connected to the flourishing of His creation and the salvation of His people. God's jealousy is always directed at protecting the exclusive covenant bond between Himself and His people. God's love is always active, pursuing, sacrificial, and costly.
This purposefulness distinguishes divine emotions from the disordered passions that ancient philosophers — and many classical theologians — feared. The Greek Stoics defined pathē (passions) as irrational, involuntary disturbances of the soul that overwhelm reason and impair judgment. If that is what emotions are, then of course God cannot have them. But as we argued in Chapter 2, drawing on Mullins's work, emotions are not merely irrational disturbances. They involve cognition, evaluation, and intentional response. They can be rational or irrational, appropriate or inappropriate, fitting or unfitting.28 God's emotions are always perfectly rational, always perfectly appropriate, and always perfectly fitting. They always track reality correctly. His anger at sin is the morally perfect response to genuine evil. His compassion for the suffering is the morally perfect response to genuine pain. His joy over repentance is the morally perfect response to a sinner coming home.
Jesse Morrell puts the point forcefully when he argues that God's emotions are a direct consequence of His moral perfection. A God who was indifferent to the suffering of the innocent, unmoved by the cries of the oppressed, or unaffected by the rebellion of His children would not be morally perfect — He would be morally deficient. A perfectly good God must feel. His emotions are not a weakness; they are an expression of His perfection.29
This is a point that I find deeply compelling, and it cuts to the very heart of the passibility/impassibility debate. If a perfect God would be emotionless, then emotional engagement is a flaw. But if a perfect God would feel — if love, compassion, grief at evil, and joy at redemption are marks of moral perfection rather than imperfection — then impassibility is the flaw, not passibility. I believe the biblical evidence makes it abundantly clear: the perfectly good God of Scripture is a God who feels.
We should also note the important connection between divine emotion and divine temporality. If God genuinely responds emotionally to events in the world — if He grieves "when" a child dies, rejoices "when" a sinner repents, and is angry "when" injustice is committed — then God must be able to experience temporal succession. A God locked into a timeless, eternal "now" could not genuinely respond to events as they unfold. This is a point I have developed at length in the companion volume The God Beyond the Clock: A Biblical and Theological Case for Dynamic Divine Temporality, which argues specifically that divine passibility entails divine temporality.40 The emotional God we encounter in Scripture is not a timeless abstraction but a living, dynamic, temporally engaged Person.
Roberto Sirvent presses the point even further, arguing that emotional vulnerability is constitutive of love itself. On Sirvent's account, a being who is incapable of being emotionally affected by the beloved — incapable of being hurt by the beloved's suffering or moved by the beloved's joy — does not truly love at all. If this is correct, then impassibility does not merely coexist in tension with love; it actively precludes it. A God who truly loves must be a God who is emotionally vulnerable to those He loves — not in the sense of being manipulated or destabilized, but in the sense of being genuinely affected by what happens to them.41 This argument will be developed more fully in Chapters 22 and 31.
Before we close this overview, it is worth noting that the overwhelming weight of the biblical evidence has led many contemporary scholars — across a wide theological spectrum — to affirm that the emotional language about God in Scripture points to something genuinely real.
Terence Fretheim, in his influential study The Suffering of God, argues that the Old Testament pervasively presents God as one who genuinely suffers with and for His people. Fretheim contends that divine suffering is not a peripheral biblical theme but is central to the Old Testament's understanding of who God is and how He relates to the world.30 Walter Brueggemann, in his Theology of the Old Testament, similarly emphasizes divine pain and vulnerability in the prophetic literature, arguing that the God of Israel is not a static, self-contained being but a dynamic, passionately engaged partner in the drama of covenant history.31
John Peckham, in The Love of God: A Canonical Model, develops what he calls a "qualified passibilist" position. Peckham argues that the biblical canon, taken as a whole, provides no support for impassibility but instead consistently portrays God as one who is genuinely affected by and responsive to His creatures. God's love, on Peckham's model, is both foreconditional (freely given, not earned) and responsive (genuinely affected by what creatures do). Peckham calls this "volitional-responsive" love.32
Rob Lister takes a somewhat more cautious approach. Lister affirms that God is genuinely "impassioned" — that divine emotion language in Scripture points to real affective engagement — but also insists that God is "impassible" in the sense that His emotional life is never involuntary, never irrational, and never destabilizing. What Lister calls the "invulnerability" of God is not emotionlessness but sovereignty over His own affective experience. God feels — but He is never overcome by what He feels.33
J. D. Kim offers yet another mediating framework. Kim argues that in God's inner-Trinitarian life (the "immanent Trinity"), God experiences perfect, self-sufficient joy and love that cannot be diminished by anything outside Himself. But in God's engagement with the world (the "economic Trinity"), God genuinely responds emotionally to His creatures — including genuine grief, anger, and compassion. Kim sees no contradiction here, because God's economic emotional responses are freely chosen expressions of His sovereign love, not involuntary reactions that compromise His essential blessedness.34
I find myself closest to Lister and Peckham, while drawing on Mullins's philosophical rigor, Lamb's biblical depth, and Kim's Trinitarian framework. My own mediating position, as I have been arguing throughout this book, is that God genuinely feels, genuinely is affected by His creatures, and genuinely responds — but His emotions are never involuntary, irrational, or destabilizing. He is sovereign over His affective life. In this qualified sense — and only this sense — I affirm a form of impassibility.
With this panoramic overview in place, let me briefly preview the ten chapters that follow. Each will take one dimension of God's emotional life and explore it in depth — exegeting key passages, examining the relevant Hebrew and Greek vocabulary, interacting with the scholarly literature, and drawing out the theological and pastoral implications.
Chapter 12: The Love of God — The Foundation of All Divine Emotion. Love is the wellspring from which all of God's other emotions flow. We will explore the rich Hebrew and Greek vocabulary for divine love — 'ahav, hesed, hashaq, raham, agapē, phileō — and argue that the biblical portrait of divine love is incompatible with strict impassibility.
Chapter 13: The Compassion and Mercy of God — A Father's Tender Heart. We will examine God's compassion through the lens of the great self-revelation of Exodus 34:6–7, the Hebrew concept of rahamim (womb-love), and the New Testament's portrait of a God whose compassion is visceral and deeply personal.
Chapter 14: The Joy and Delight of God — A God Who Celebrates. From the delight of creation to the joy of heaven over one repentant sinner, we will see that God is not merely satisfied — He is exuberantly, ecstatically joyful over His people and His purposes.
Chapter 15: The Grief and Sorrow of God — A God Who Weeps. Perhaps the most challenging emotion to affirm of God, divine grief takes us into the heart of the passibility debate. We will explore Genesis 6:6, Hosea 11:8, and other key texts that portray a God whose heart breaks over sin and suffering.
Chapter 16: The Anger and Wrath of God — Holy Fire, Not Uncontrolled Fury. Divine anger is one of the most frequently described divine attributes in the Old Testament — and one of the most misunderstood. We will show that God's anger is always righteous, always patient, always purposeful, and always an expression of His love.
Chapter 17: The Jealousy and Zeal of God — The Passion of a Faithful Husband. Far from being a petty, insecure emotion, God's jealousy is the fierce protective love of a faithful husband who will not share His bride with rivals. God's name is "Jealous" (Exodus 34:14).
Chapter 18: The Hatred of God — What God Cannot Tolerate. The most uncomfortable of God's emotions, divine hatred is always directed at evil — at the things that destroy what God loves. We will examine Proverbs 6:16–19, the psalmic texts, and the provocative claim of Psalm 5:5 that God "hates all evildoers."
Chapter 19: The Patience and Longsuffering of God — Slow to Anger, Rich in Love. God's patience is not passivity or indifference. It is the active, emotionally engaged decision to withhold judgment in hope of repentance. We will explore the beautiful Hebrew phrase 'erek 'appayim — "long of nostrils" — which pictures God as holding His breath before letting His anger out.
Chapter 20: The Emotions of Jesus — The Human Face of God's Heart. Jesus is the ultimate revelation of God's emotional life. Through His tears, His anger, His compassion, His joy, and His anguish, we see the very heart of God made visible in human form.
Chapter 21: The Emotional Life of the Holy Spirit — The God Who Can Be Grieved. The third Person of the Trinity is not an impersonal force but a personal being who can be grieved (Ephesians 4:30), quenched (1 Thessalonians 5:19), and who produces emotional fruit in the lives of believers (Galatians 5:22–23).
We have covered a great deal of ground in this chapter, and yet we have only scratched the surface. The biblical evidence for the emotional life of God is so vast, so pervasive, and so deeply woven into the fabric of Scripture that no single chapter could do it justice. That is why we need the ten chapters that follow — to go deep where this chapter has gone wide.
But even this overview should be enough to establish several crucial points.
First, the emotional language about God in Scripture is not marginal or peripheral. It is everywhere — in every section of the canon, every literary genre, and every historical period. This is one of the most prominent and consistent features of the biblical portrait of God.
Second, the range of divine emotions is remarkably diverse. God does not merely love. He also hates, grieves, burns with anger, overflows with compassion, rejoices with singing, and jealously guards His covenant relationship with His people. His emotional life is rich, complex, and multifaceted — far more so than either the caricature of an "angry God" or a "nice God" suggests.
Third, God's emotions are always purposeful, always righteous, and always connected to His love. They are never random, capricious, or out of control. Divine emotions are expressions of moral perfection, not signs of weakness or instability.
Fourth, the burden of proof rests on those who would dismiss all of this evidence as merely figurative. The anthropomorphism objection (treated in Chapter 6) must contend with the sheer weight, breadth, and theological centrality of divine-emotion language throughout Scripture. Simply labeling it all "anthropopathic" does not make the evidence go away — it just refuses to take it seriously.
And fifth — and most importantly — this evidence reveals a God who is passionately, relentlessly, overwhelmingly invested in His relationship with His creatures. He is not watching from a distance in a state of undisturbed bliss. He is in the thick of it with us — loving, grieving, celebrating, aching, burning, and pursuing. The God of the Bible has a heart, and that heart beats for you.
As Morrell rightly insists, "No one can truly know the heart of God without knowing that His heart is broken."35 The emotional life of God is not a theological problem to be solved. It is a revelation to be received — a breathtaking invitation into the depths of divine love. The God who made us in His image made us emotional beings because He Himself is an emotional God.42 And to know Him truly is to know Him as He has revealed Himself: the God who feels.
In the next chapter, we turn to the foundation of all divine emotion — the love of God. If God is love (1 John 4:8), then love is not just one emotion among many. It is the soil from which every other divine emotion grows. Let us dig in.
Chapter Summary: The biblical evidence for God's emotional life is overwhelming in both volume and consistency. Over four hundred passages describe God's anger alone. The seven emotions most frequently associated with God in Scripture — hate, anger, jealousy, sorrow, joy, compassion, and love — appear across every genre and period of the Bible. God's emotions are always purposeful, righteous, and rooted in love. This evidence is not marginal; it is one of the most pervasive features of the biblical portrait of God. The chapters that follow will explore each divine emotion in depth.
1 The estimate of over four hundred references to divine anger in the Old Testament is widely cited in the scholarly literature. See David T. Lamb, The Emotions of God: Making Sense of a God Who Hates, Weeps, and Loves (Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2022), 47; cf. Abraham Heschel, The Prophets (New York: Harper & Row, 1962), 279–80. ↩
2 On the frequency and theological importance of hesed, see R. Laird Harris, Gleason L. Archer Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke, Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (Chicago: Moody, 1980), 1:305–7. ↩
3 Lamb, Emotions of God, 13. ↩
4 Lamb, Emotions of God, 9. ↩
5 Lamb, Emotions of God, 9–10. ↩
6 As Lamb observes, "If there were 'one emotion to rule them all,' it would clearly be love, since all of these emotions are somehow manifestations of God's loving character." Lamb, Emotions of God, 15–16. ↩
7 On the range of meaning of tov in Genesis 1, see Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1–15, Word Biblical Commentary (Waco, TX: Word, 1987), 18. ↩
8 On nacham and 'atsav in Genesis 6:6, see Victor P. Hamilton, The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1–17, New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990), 274–75; Jesse Morrell, The Emotions of God: How Man Can Bless or Hurt God (Open Air Outreach, 2016), chap. "The Divine Grief of God." ↩
9 On 'aph as "nostril" and its use for divine anger, see Lamb, Emotions of God, 47–48. ↩
10 On the three Hebrew love words in Deuteronomy 7:7–8, see Lamb, Emotions of God, 155–56. The detailed exegesis of this passage belongs to Chapter 12 of this book. ↩
11 Abraham Heschel, The Prophets (New York: Harper & Row, 1962), 223–31. ↩
12 Heschel, The Prophets, 26. ↩
13 On haphak in Hosea 11:8 and the emotional intensity of this passage, see Terence E. Fretheim, The Suffering of God: An Old Testament Perspective (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984), 113–14. The full exegesis of Hosea 11:8 belongs to Chapter 15 of this book. ↩
14 Walter Brueggemann, Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1997), 300–301. ↩
15 Terence E. Fretheim, The Suffering of God: An Old Testament Perspective (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984), 107–48. ↩
16 On gil as exuberant, embodied joy, see Lamb, Emotions of God, 120–21. Full treatment of Zephaniah 3:17 belongs to Chapter 14. ↩
17 Lamb, Emotions of God, 16. ↩
18 On the complexity of divine emotions within individual psalms, see Lamb, Emotions of God, 16–17. ↩
19 Lamb, Emotions of God, 17–19. ↩
20 On the New Testament's use of Psalm 69 and its connection to Jesus, see Lamb, Emotions of God, 20. James L. Mays calls Psalm 69 "a passion psalm of Christ"; see John Goldingay, Psalms, Volume 2: Psalms 42–89 (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007), 339. ↩
21 Lamb, Emotions of God, 176. Lamb argues that Jesus always wears both his "divine hat" and his "human hat," and that describing his emotions as merely human is both misleading and potentially heretical. ↩
22 On the grieving of the Holy Spirit, see Gordon D. Fee, God's Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1994), 710–15. Full treatment of this passage belongs to Chapter 21. ↩
23 Lamb, Emotions of God, 16. ↩
24 Lamb notes that "the Psalms are quoted or alluded to in the New Testament more than any other Old Testament book" and connects this in part to their rich emotional language. Lamb, Emotions of God, 16. ↩
25 This argument is developed more fully in Chapter 6, where we address the anthropomorphism objection at length. The key point is that divine-emotion language does crucial theological work in context — it is not decorative but explanatory. ↩
26 On analogy running upward, see R. T. Mullins, God and Emotion, Elements in the Philosophy of Religion (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020), §3.1. See also the full argument in Chapter 6 of this book. ↩
27 Rob Lister, God Is Impassible and Impassioned: Toward a Theology of Divine Emotion (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2013), 191–95. Lister uses the term "invulnerability" to describe God's insusceptibility to involuntary emotional manipulation, while affirming that God is genuinely passionate in His engagement with His creatures. ↩
28 Mullins, God and Emotion, §1.1–§1.3. As argued in Chapter 2 of this book, the cognitive/evaluative theory of emotions shows that emotions involve perception, evaluation, and intentional response — not merely irrational disturbance. ↩
29 Morrell, Emotions of God, chap. "The Divine Passibility of God." Morrell argues that God's emotions are a direct consequence of His moral perfection: a perfectly good being must respond emotionally to good and evil. ↩
30 Fretheim, The Suffering of God, 1–12, 107–48. ↩
31 Brueggemann, Theology of the Old Testament, 297–313. ↩
32 John C. Peckham, The Love of God: A Canonical Model (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2015), 1–20, 237–53. ↩
33 Lister, God Is Impassible and Impassioned, 191–96. ↩
34 J. D. Kim, Constructing a Mediating Theology: Affirming the Impassibility and the Passibility of the Triune God (Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2022), chap. 5, "The Immanent Trinity Is Impassible"; chap. 6, "The Economic Trinity Is Passible." ↩
35 Morrell, Emotions of God, chap. "Introduction." ↩
36 Wayne Grudem, Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994), 165–66. Grudem provides a concise list of key divine-emotion texts that demonstrates the breadth of the evidence. Cf. Lister, God Is Impassible and Impassioned, 196. ↩
37 On the importance of distinguishing between "passions" (involuntary, irrational, bodily disturbances) and "affections" (voluntary, rational, purposeful responses), see Mullins, God and Emotion, §2.2; cf. Jonathan Edwards, Religious Affections, ed. John E. Smith, Works of Jonathan Edwards 2 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959), 96–99. This distinction is developed fully in Chapter 2 of this book. ↩
38 On the broader biblical and theological framework for divine emotion, see Andrew J. Schmutzer, ed., Divine Suffering: Theology, History, and Church Mission (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2023); Graham A. Cole, "The Living God in the Midst of His People: Towards a Biblically-Qualified Understanding of Divine Impassibility," in Schmutzer, Divine Suffering. ↩
39 D. A. Carson, The Difficult Doctrine of the Love of God (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2000), 11–12. Carson distinguishes five ways the Bible speaks of God's love, each of which has emotional dimensions that resist reduction to mere volition. ↩
40 On the connection between divine temporality and genuine emotional responsiveness, see the companion volume: The God Beyond the Clock: A Biblical and Theological Case for Dynamic Divine Temporality, especially Chapter 28, which treats the argument that divine passibility entails divine temporality. ↩
41 Roberto Sirvent, Embracing Vulnerability: Human and Divine (Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2014), chap. 4. Sirvent argues that emotional vulnerability is constitutive of love — and that therefore a God who truly loves must be emotionally vulnerable to His creatures. ↩
42 On the connection between the imago Dei and human emotionality as reflecting divine emotionality, see Morrell, Emotions of God, chap. "The Divine Passibility of God"; cf. Millard J. Erickson, Christian Theology, 3rd ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013), 291–92. ↩
Brueggemann, Walter. Theology of the Old Testament: Testimony, Dispute, Advocacy. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1997.
Carson, D. A. The Difficult Doctrine of the Love of God. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2000.
Edwards, Jonathan. Religious Affections. Edited by John E. Smith. Works of Jonathan Edwards 2. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1959.
Erickson, Millard J. Christian Theology. 3rd ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2013.
Fee, Gordon D. God's Empowering Presence: The Holy Spirit in the Letters of Paul. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1994.
Fretheim, Terence E. The Suffering of God: An Old Testament Perspective. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1984.
Goldingay, John. Psalms, Volume 2: Psalms 42–89. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2007.
Grudem, Wayne. Systematic Theology: An Introduction to Biblical Doctrine. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1994.
Hamilton, Victor P. The Book of Genesis: Chapters 1–17. New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990.
Harris, R. Laird, Gleason L. Archer Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke. Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament. 2 vols. Chicago: Moody, 1980.
Heschel, Abraham. The Prophets. New York: Harper & Row, 1962.
Kim, J. D. Constructing a Mediating Theology: Affirming the Impassibility and the Passibility of the Triune God. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2022.
Lamb, David T. The Emotions of God: Making Sense of a God Who Hates, Weeps, and Loves. Downers Grove, IL: IVP, 2022.
Lister, Rob. God Is Impassible and Impassioned: Toward a Theology of Divine Emotion. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2013.
Morrell, Jesse. The Emotions of God: How Man Can Bless or Hurt God. Open Air Outreach, 2016.
Mullins, R. T. God and Emotion. Elements in the Philosophy of Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
Peckham, John C. The Love of God: A Canonical Model. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2015.
Schmutzer, Andrew J., ed. Divine Suffering: Theology, History, and Church Mission. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2023.
Sirvent, Roberto. Embracing Vulnerability: Human and Divine. Eugene, OR: Pickwick, 2014.
Wenham, Gordon J. Genesis 1–15. Word Biblical Commentary. Waco, TX: Word, 1987.