Chapter 10
The Epistle to the Hebrews — The Definitive Sacrifice and the Heavenly Sanctuary

Introduction: The New Testament's Most Sustained Reflection on the Atonement

If you could read only one book of the Bible to understand what the death of Jesus accomplished, the Epistle to the Hebrews would be a strong candidate. No other New Testament document reflects so deeply, so carefully, or so systematically on the meaning of Christ's atoning death. Where Paul scatters his atonement theology across many letters, touching on it in bursts of theological brilliance, and where Peter offers concentrated but brief statements about the cross, the unknown author of Hebrews builds a sustained, architecturally ambitious argument from start to finish. The entire epistle is, in many ways, one long meditation on why the death of Jesus matters — and why it matters more than anything that came before it.

I find the Epistle to the Hebrews endlessly rich. It is one of those books that rewards every return visit with fresh insight. In the nineteenth century, Hebrews was one of the most popular books among Protestant preachers, but in our own time it has received far less attention.¹ That is unfortunate, because Hebrews combines some of the highest Christology in the entire New Testament — presenting Jesus as the radiance of God's glory, the exact imprint of His nature, the one who upholds the universe by the word of His power — with some of the most wrenching descriptions of Jesus' suffering humanity. For this reason alone it should be treasured by every Christian who wants to understand the cross.

What makes Hebrews unique is its method. The author takes the Old Testament sacrificial system — especially the Day of Atonement ritual that we explored in Chapter 5 — and uses it as the interpretive lens through which to understand what happened at Calvary. The sacrifices, the priesthood, the tabernacle, the blood, the Most Holy Place — all of these familiar Old Testament realities are shown to be shadows pointing forward to the one great reality: Jesus Christ, who is simultaneously the perfect High Priest and the perfect sacrifice. He is the one who enters, not a sanctuary made with hands, but heaven itself. He brings, not the blood of goats and calves, but His own blood. And His offering is not repeated year after year, but accomplished once for all.

In this chapter, we will walk carefully through the major atonement passages in Hebrews. We will see how the author develops the priesthood of Christ, the theology of sacrifice, the heavenly sanctuary, the new covenant, and the finality of Christ's offering. Along the way, we will discover that Hebrews weaves together multiple atonement motifs — sacrifice, priestly mediation, propitiation, victory over the devil, ransom, purification, covenant inauguration, and the bearing of sins — into a unified tapestry. And at the heart of that tapestry, I believe, stands substitution: the innocent one offering himself in the place of the guilty, accomplishing what they could never accomplish for themselves.

The Opening Declaration: Purification for Sins (Hebrews 1:1–3)

The epistle begins with one of the most magnificent sentences in all of Scripture. Before the author even gets to his argument about priesthood and sacrifice, he introduces us to the Son in exalted terms:

"Long ago, at many times and in many ways, God spoke to our fathers by the prophets, but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world. He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by his word of power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high." (Hebrews 1:1–3, ESV)

Notice the astonishing sweep of this passage. The Son is the heir of all things. The universe was created through him. He is the radiance — the shining forth — of God's glory. He is the exact imprint of God's very nature. He upholds the entire universe by his word of power. And then, almost as if in passing, the author drops this bombshell: "After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high."

This single clause — "after making purification for sins" — is the seed from which the entire argument of Hebrews will grow. The Greek word used here is katharismon (καθαρισμόν), meaning "a cleansing" or "purification." This is temple language. It refers to the kind of ritual cleansing that was accomplished through sacrifice in the Old Testament tabernacle and temple.² The term appears nineteen times in the Septuagint (the Greek translation of the Old Testament), with a consistent focus on ritual purification. Its use in Exodus 30:10, concerning the Day of Atonement ritual, is especially significant since the author of Hebrews develops the connection between Christ and the Day of Atonement at length in chapters 8 through 10.³

What the author is saying, right from his opening sentence, is this: the same divine Son who created the world and sustains it has personally dealt with the problem of human sin. He has made purification — the kind of cleansing that the entire Old Testament sacrificial system was designed to accomplish. And having completed that work, he "sat down." That detail matters enormously, as we will see later. The Levitical priests never sat down in the tabernacle because their work was never finished. Christ sat down because his work of purification was complete.

Tasting Death for Everyone: Hebrews 2:9, 14–17

In chapter 2, the author moves from the exalted identity of the Son to the astonishing reality of the incarnation. Why would the one who created the universe take on human flesh? Because that was the only way to accomplish what needed to be done. The argument unfolds in stages.

First, in verse 9:

"But we see him who for a little while was made lower than the angels, namely Jesus, crowned with glory and honor because of the suffering of death, so that by the grace of God he might taste death for everyone." (Hebrews 2:9, ESV)

The phrase "taste death for everyone" is packed with theological significance. The Greek is hyper pantos (ὑπὲρ παντός) — literally, "on behalf of every one" or "for the sake of everyone." We discussed the preposition hyper (ὑπέρ) at length in Chapter 2's treatment of atonement terminology. In contexts like this, where someone dies hyper another, the word carries a clear beneficiary and substitutionary sense: Jesus experienced death so that others would not have to experience its ultimate consequences. He tasted the full bitterness of death so that we could be delivered from it.⁴

Notice also the scope: he tasted death "for everyone" — pantos, without restriction. This supports the universal scope of the atonement that we will defend at length in Chapter 30. Christ's death was not for a select few but for every human being. As David Allen notes, the "everyone" here means precisely what it says — the incarnation and atonement were necessary for Christ to die and "taste death" universally.⁵

Then, in verses 14–15, the argument takes a dramatic turn toward what we might call the Christus Victor dimension of the atonement:

"Since therefore the children share in flesh and blood, he himself likewise partook of the same things, that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil, and deliver all those who through fear of death were subject to lifelong slavery." (Hebrews 2:14–15, ESV)

Here we see something remarkable. The author of Hebrews tells us that one purpose of Christ's death was to "destroy" (or better, "render powerless" — the Greek is katargesē, καταργήσῃ) the devil, who holds the power of death. This is Christus Victor language. Christ's death is a victory over the spiritual powers of evil. Through the cross, the devil's hold over humanity — particularly the enslaving fear of death — has been broken.

William Hess rightly emphasizes this Christus Victor dimension. The author of Hebrews, Hess argues, credits the devil with having power over death, and Jesus enters into death precisely to defeat this enemy and free those held captive.⁶ I agree that this victorious dimension is real and important. But we should be careful not to isolate it from the other dimensions the author of Hebrews develops. Victory over the devil is one facet of what the cross accomplishes — but it is not the only one, as the next verses make clear.

For in verses 16–17, the author moves directly to priestly and propitiatory language:

"For surely it is not angels that he helps, but he helps the offspring of Abraham. Therefore he had to be made like his brothers in every respect, so that he might become a merciful and faithful high priest in the service of God, to make propitiation for the sins of the people." (Hebrews 2:16–17, ESV)

The word translated "propitiation" here is hilaskesthai (ἱλάσκεσθαι), the verb form of the hilaskomai word group that we examined in detail in Chapter 2 and Chapter 8. This is the same word family that lies behind hilastērion in Romans 3:25 and hilasmos in 1 John 2:2 and 4:10. As we discussed in those chapters, the debate over whether this term means "propitiation" (the turning away of God's just response to sin) or "expiation" (the cleansing or covering of sin) has been extensive.

Leon Morris's landmark study provides clear evidence that the verb hilaskomai, while a complex term that includes the idea of expiation or cleansing of sin, also conveys the concept of averting or addressing the divine response to sin.⁷ Allen concurs: the consistent view of Scripture is that humanity's sin has created a problem before God — a judicial problem, not merely a ritual one — and that this problem is only resolved through the substitutionary atonement Christ has provided on the cross.⁸ The fact that some modern translations render hilaskesthai here as "expiation" rather than "propitiation" does not eliminate the propitiatory dimension; it simply reflects a scholarly preference to emphasize one side of a multi-dimensional word.

What is crucial to see is the logic of the argument. Why did the Son of God have to become human? Because he needed to become a high priest. And what does a high priest do? He makes propitiation for the sins of the people. The incarnation was not an end in itself; it was necessary for the atonement. The Son took on flesh so that he could die, and he died so that he could deal with sin on behalf of others. That is substitutionary logic from beginning to end.

The Superior High Priest: Hebrews 4:14–5:10 and 7:1–28

Before diving into the heart of the atonement theology in chapters 9 and 10, it is important to understand the portrait of Christ's priesthood that the author develops across several chapters. The role of Christ as priest is the dominant theme in Hebrews — he is called "priest" six times and "high priest" ten times throughout the epistle.⁹ Priesthood and sacrifice are inextricably linked in this letter. You cannot understand the author's theology of sacrifice without first grasping his theology of priesthood.

In Hebrews 4:14–16, we encounter one of the most pastorally tender passages in the New Testament:

"Since then we have a great high priest who has passed through the heavens, Jesus, the Son of God, let us hold fast our confession. For we do not have a high priest who is unable to sympathize with our weaknesses, but one who in every respect has been tempted as we are, yet without sin. Let us then with confidence draw near to the throne of grace, that we may receive mercy and find grace to help in time of need." (Hebrews 4:14–16, ESV)

This passage beautifully captures the dual nature of Christ's qualification as our high priest. On one hand, he has "passed through the heavens" — he is the exalted, divine Son of God. On the other hand, he is not distant or unsympathetic. He has been tempted in every way we are, yet without sin. He understands human weakness from the inside. As Fleming Rutledge observes, Hebrews combines some of the highest Christology in the New Testament with some of the most wrenching descriptions of Jesus' suffering humanity — and for this reason it should be prized by every believer who needs a compassionate savior.¹⁰

In chapter 5, the author introduces a crucial theme: Jesus is a priest not after the order of Aaron (the Levitical priesthood) but after the order of Melchizedek — the mysterious priest-king who blessed Abraham in Genesis 14. This theme is developed at length in chapter 7, where the author draws several contrasts between the Levitical priesthood and the priesthood of Christ:

First, the Levitical priests served by ancestral right; Christ serves "by the power of an indestructible life" (Hebrews 7:16). Second, the former priests died; Christ "holds his priesthood permanently, because he continues forever" and "always lives to make intercession" for us (7:24–25). Third, the Levitical priests were sinners who had to offer sacrifice for their own sins first; Christ is "holy, innocent, unstained, separated from sinners, and exalted above the heavens" (7:26).

This brings us to the pivotal verse Hebrews 7:27:

"He has no need, like those high priests, to offer sacrifices daily, first for his own sins and then for those of the people, since he did this once for all when he offered up himself." (Hebrews 7:27, ESV)

Two things leap out of this verse. First, the words "once for all" — ephapax (ἐφάπαξ) in Greek. This term will become the drumbeat of the entire argument. The Levitical sacrifices were repeated daily and annually. Christ's sacrifice was unrepeatable — done once, accomplished forever. Second, notice what Christ offered: "he offered up himself." Unlike every previous priest in Israel's history, Jesus did not bring an animal to the altar. He brought himself. He is both the priest who offers and the sacrifice that is offered.¹¹

The Heart of the Argument: Hebrews 9:1–28

We come now to what I consider the theological summit of Hebrews — and one of the most important chapters in the entire New Testament for atonement theology. In Hebrews 9, the author provides his extended Day of Atonement typology, comparing the old covenant sacrificial system point by point with the new covenant sacrifice of Christ. The chapter divides naturally into three major sections: the old covenant sanctuary and its limitations (vv. 1–10), Christ's superior sacrifice and the heavenly sanctuary (vv. 11–22), and the finality and sufficiency of Christ's offering (vv. 23–28).

The Old Covenant Sanctuary and Its Limitations (9:1–10)

The author begins by describing the layout and worship of the old covenant tabernacle — the outer room (the Holy Place) with its lampstand and table of bread, and the inner room (the Most Holy Place, or Holy of Holies) with the golden altar of incense and the ark of the covenant covered by the cherubim of glory (9:1–5). He does not dwell on the details — "of these things we cannot now speak in detail" (9:5) — because his interest is not in the furniture but in the access, or rather the lack of it.

In verses 6–7, he explains the crucial limitation of the old system:

"These preparations having thus been made, the priests go regularly into the first section, performing their ritual duties, but into the second only the high priest goes, and he but once a year, and not without taking blood, which he offers for himself and for the unintentional sins of the people." (Hebrews 9:6–7, ESV)

The restricted access tells the whole story. Under the old covenant, the way into God's immediate presence was blocked. Only one person — the high priest — could enter the Most Holy Place. And he could do so only one day per year — the Day of Atonement (Yom Kippur, discussed in detail in Chapter 5). And he could not enter without blood — the blood of sacrificial animals. The Holy Spirit, the author tells us, was indicating by this arrangement "that the way into the holy places is not yet opened as long as the first section is still standing" (9:8).

The old sacrifices, in other words, were never the solution. They were signposts pointing to the solution. Verse 9 says they could not "perfect the conscience of the worshiper." They dealt with external, ritual matters — "regulations for the body" (9:10) — but they could not reach the human heart, could not deal with the deeper problem of a guilty conscience before God. They were, to use the author's later term, "a shadow of the good things to come" rather than "the true form of these realities" (10:1).

Christ's Superior Sacrifice (9:11–22)

Having established the limitation of the old system, the author now unveils the breathtaking reality that it was always pointing toward:

"But when Christ appeared as a high priest of the good things that have come, then through the greater and more perfect tent (not made with hands, that is, not of this creation) he entered once for all into the holy places, not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption." (Hebrews 9:11–12, ESV)

Every phrase here is loaded with meaning. "Christ appeared as a high priest" — the connection is explicit. Jesus fulfills the role that the Levitical high priest prefigured. "Through the greater and more perfect tent" — not the earthly tabernacle, but the heavenly sanctuary, the true dwelling place of God. "Not made with hands" — this is not a human construction; it belongs to the realm of ultimate divine reality. "He entered once for all" — there is that word ephapax again, the decisive, unrepeatable act. "Not by means of the blood of goats and calves but by means of his own blood" — the contrast could not be more vivid. The entire Levitical system used animal blood; Christ used his own. "Thus securing an eternal redemption" — not a temporary, annual covering of sin, but a permanent, everlasting liberation.

The word "redemption" here is lytrōsin (λύτρωσιν), from the same root as lytron (ransom) that Jesus used in Mark 10:45 when he said he came "to give his life as a ransom for many." This is ransom and redemption language — Christ's blood is the price that secures our freedom from sin and death.

In verses 13–14, the author presses the superiority argument further:

"For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the sprinkling of defiled persons with the ashes of a heifer, sanctify for the purification of the flesh, how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, purify our conscience from dead works to serve the living God." (Hebrews 9:13–14, ESV)

This is a "how much more" argument — what scholars call an argument a fortiori (from the lesser to the greater). If animal blood could accomplish ceremonial purification of the body, how much more will the blood of Christ accomplish the deeper purification of the human conscience? Notice the three things said about Christ's sacrifice here: it was offered "through the eternal Spirit" (it was a Trinitarian act — Father, Son, and Spirit are all involved), it was offered "without blemish" (Christ was sinless, meeting the requirement of a perfect sacrifice), and it purifies our "conscience from dead works to serve the living God" (it accomplishes what the old system never could — inner, spiritual transformation).

Philippe de la Trinité, writing from a Catholic Thomistic perspective, draws attention to the profundity of this verse. Following Thomas Aquinas, he notes that the Apostle explains and justifies the efficacy of Christ's blood under three heads: we should consider who shed this blood (the Son of God himself), why he shed it (prompted by the Holy Spirit out of love for God and humanity), and how he shed it (as an immaculate offering without blemish). Because of who Christ is, his blood possesses infinite purifying power.¹³

In verse 15, the author introduces the theme of covenant inauguration:

"Therefore he is the mediator of a new covenant, so that those who are called may receive the promised eternal inheritance, since a death has occurred that redeems them from the transgressions committed under the first covenant." (Hebrews 9:15, ESV)

Christ's death inaugurates the new covenant — the covenant prophesied by Jeremiah (31:31–34) in which God would write his law on his people's hearts and remember their sins no more. Jesus himself claimed this at the Last Supper when he said, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood" (Luke 22:20; cf. 1 Corinthians 11:25). The author of Hebrews develops this connection extensively. Jesus is "the Mediator of the new covenant" (9:15), and it is "the everlasting covenant" (13:20).¹⁴

Verses 16–22 develop the principle that covenants are inaugurated through death and blood. The first covenant was inaugurated by Moses with the blood of sacrifices (9:18–21). In the same way, the new covenant is inaugurated by the death of Christ. And the author states a foundational principle in verse 22:

"Indeed, under the law almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins." (Hebrews 9:22, ESV)

This verse — "without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness" — has been debated extensively. Some scholars, like those in the Catholic tradition following Stanislas Lyonnet, argue that the shedding of blood signifies not punishment or penal substitution but consecration and purification — the offering of life to God.¹⁵ Hess takes a similar line, arguing that blood cleanses and purifies rather than satisfying divine justice. He writes that Christ's blood is applied to us as the perfect sacrifice in the New Covenant, not to appease God's wrath, but because it cleanses us and reverses the corruption of sin.¹⁶

I think there is genuine insight in this emphasis on purification and consecration. The shedding of blood in the Old Testament is indeed rich with positive significance — it signifies the offering of life, the consecration of a people to God, the establishment of covenant communion. Philippe de la Trinité is right that the symbolism of blood would be distorted if we lost sight of the fact that it is "above all else positive and leading to union with God in love."¹⁷

However, I believe it is also a mistake to eliminate the judicial and substitutionary dimension from the shedding of blood entirely. The reason blood is required is that sin creates a real problem before a holy God — a problem that cannot be resolved without the offering of a life. As we discussed in Chapter 4, the Levitical system presupposes that sin defiles, that defilement disrupts the relationship between a holy God and his people, and that restoration requires a costly remedy. The blood does purify, yes. But it also deals with guilt, with the judicial consequences of sin. The two dimensions — purification and penalty, cleansing and cost — belong together. When Hebrews 9:22 says "without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness," the word "forgiveness" (aphesis, ἄφεσις) is a judicial term. It means release, remission — the cancellation of a debt. That is not merely ritual purification language; it is the language of guilt removed and penalty dealt with.

The Finality and Sufficiency of Christ's Offering (9:23–28)

In the final section of chapter 9, the author brings his argument to a crescendo:

"Thus it was necessary for the copies of the heavenly things to be purified with these rites, but the heavenly things themselves with better sacrifices than these. For Christ has entered, not into holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true things, but into heaven itself, now to appear in the presence of God on our behalf." (Hebrews 9:23–24, ESV)

The earthly tabernacle, with all its beauty and solemnity, was only a copy — a model, a shadow. The true sanctuary is heaven itself. And Christ has entered that true sanctuary. He stands now "in the presence of God" — not for himself but "on our behalf" (hyper hēmōn, ὑπὲρ ἡμῶν). There is that word hyper again — "on behalf of," "for the sake of" — the word that carries substitutionary and beneficiary significance throughout the New Testament atonement passages.

The author then emphasizes that Christ's sacrifice does not need to be repeated:

"Nor was it to offer himself repeatedly, as the high priest enters the holy places every year with blood not his own, for then he would have had to suffer repeatedly since the foundation of the world. But as it is, he has appeared once for all at the end of the ages to put away sin by the sacrifice of himself." (Hebrews 9:25–26, ESV)

The phrase "once for all" (ephapax) appears again. And notice the purpose: "to put away sin." The Greek is eis athetēsin tēs hamartias (εἰς ἀθέτησιν τῆς ἁμαρτίας) — literally, "for the annulment" or "for the setting aside" of sin. This is stronger than covering or temporarily dealing with sin. Christ's sacrifice puts sin away, removes it, nullifies it. The Old Testament sacrifices served as "a reminder of sins every year" (10:3), but Christ's sacrifice actually accomplishes what they could only symbolize.

The chapter concludes with one of its most powerful statements — a passage that deliberately echoes Isaiah 53:

"And just as it is appointed for man to die once, and after that comes judgment, so Christ, having been offered once to bear the sins of many, will appear a second time, not to deal with sin but to save those who are eagerly waiting for him." (Hebrews 9:27–28, ESV)

The phrase "to bear the sins of many" is a direct allusion to Isaiah 53:12: "he bore the sin of many, and makes intercession for the transgressors." As we explored in Chapter 6's exegesis of the Suffering Servant passage, the language of "bearing sin" (nasa + avon/chet in Hebrew) consistently refers to carrying the consequences and guilt of sin on behalf of others. The author of Hebrews is making the connection explicit: what Isaiah prophesied about the Suffering Servant, Jesus has fulfilled through his sacrificial death.¹⁸

Stott notes the significance of this sin-bearing language. In the New Testament we read that Christ "was once offered to bear the sins of many" (Hebrews 9:28), and this language cannot be understood apart from the Old Testament background of substitutionary sin-bearing. To "bear sin" means to bear sin's consequences — its penalty, its weight, its judgment.¹⁹

The word "many" here, as Allen points out, follows the Semitic usage in which "the many" functions as an inclusive term meaning "all." It does not mean "some but not others." It means the great multitude — everyone for whom Christ died.²⁰

The Shadow and the Reality: Hebrews 10:1–18

Chapter 10 brings the argument to its definitive conclusion. The author states his central contrast in the starkest terms:

"For since the law has but a shadow of the good things to come instead of the true form of these realities, it can never, by the same sacrifices that are continually offered every year, make perfect those who draw near. Otherwise, would they not have ceased being offered, since the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have any consciousness of sins? But in these sacrifices there is a reminder of sins every year. For it is impossible for the blood of bulls and goats to take away sins." (Hebrews 10:1–4, ESV)

The word "shadow" (skian, σκιάν) captures the author's hermeneutical framework. The Old Testament sacrificial system was not meaningless — shadows are real, and they point to something. But a shadow is not the thing itself. The Levitical sacrifices were shadows of the true sacrifice that was coming. They were divinely intended typological preparations for Christ's atoning death.²¹ The fact that they had to be repeated annually proved their inadequacy. If they had actually dealt with sin fully, they would have been offered once and then stopped. Their repetition was itself evidence that the real solution had not yet arrived.

The author then provides a remarkable interpretation of Psalm 40:6–8, placing it on the lips of Christ himself:

"Consequently, when Christ came into the world, he said, 'Sacrifices and offerings you have not desired, but a body you have prepared for me; in burnt offerings and sin offerings you have taken no pleasure. Then I said, "Behold, I have come to do your will, O God, as it is written of me in the scroll of the book."'" (Hebrews 10:5–7, ESV)

This is a stunning passage. The author reads Psalm 40 as the words of Christ entering the world at his incarnation. God did not ultimately desire animal sacrifices — they were always pointing beyond themselves. What God desired was obedience, willing self-offering. And so Christ says: "A body you have prepared for me" — the incarnation was the preparation of the ultimate sacrifice. "I have come to do your will" — the Son's obedience to the Father's redemptive plan is the heart of the sacrifice. As Rutledge observes, the phrase "I have come to do your will" is written over the whole record of our Lord's life; this was his attitude from first to last.²²

In Christ's obedient self-offering, the old sacrificial order is abolished and the new order is established. Verse 10 states the result:

"And by that will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Jesus Christ once for all." (Hebrews 10:10, ESV)

Again, ephapax — once for all. Christ's sacrifice is unrepeatable because it was fully effective. We have been "sanctified" — set apart, made holy, consecrated to God — through the offering of his body. This is not a temporary or provisional arrangement. It is permanent and decisive.

Then comes one of the most theologically rich contrasts in the entire epistle:

"And every priest stands daily at his service, offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But when Christ had offered for all time a single sacrifice for sins, he sat down at the right hand of God, waiting from that time until his enemies should be made a footstool for his feet. For by a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified." (Hebrews 10:11–14, ESV)

The author drives the point home with a quotation from Jeremiah's new covenant prophecy and a decisive conclusion:

"And the Holy Spirit also bears witness to us; for after saying, 'This is the covenant that I will make with them after those days, declares the Lord: I will put my laws on their hearts, and write them on their minds,' then he adds, 'I will remember their sins and their lawless deeds no more.' Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer any offering for sin." (Hebrews 10:15–18, ESV)

If God remembers our sins "no more," then there is no more need for sacrifice. The case is closed. The sacrificial system has fulfilled its purpose — it pointed forward to Christ — and now it is finished. Where there is full and final forgiveness, the sacrificial system has nothing left to do.

The Heavenly Sanctuary: Shadow, Reality, and Christ's Ongoing Ministry

One of the most distinctive features of Hebrews' atonement theology is its emphasis on the heavenly sanctuary. The earthly tabernacle, according to Hebrews, was built according to a pattern that Moses was shown on the mountain (8:5; cf. Exodus 25:40). It was "a copy and shadow of the heavenly things" (8:5). The "true tent" — the real sanctuary — is in heaven, "set up not by man but by the Lord" (8:2).

This shadow/reality framework (sometimes called a Platonic or vertical typology) gives the author's argument its distinctive shape. Christ has entered "not into holy places made with hands, which are copies of the true things, but into heaven itself" (9:24). The earthly tabernacle was real, but it was not ultimate. The ultimate reality is in heaven, and that is where Christ has gone.

Hess rightly highlights this heavenly sanctuary theme. He draws attention to the multiple passages in Hebrews that describe the earthly tabernacle as a "copy" and "shadow" (Hebrews 8:5; 9:24), and emphasizes that Christ's priestly ministry takes place in the true heavenly realm.²³ This is an important observation. The atonement is not merely a transaction that happened at Calvary; it has a heavenly, cosmic dimension. Christ's blood — the life that he offered — is presented in the heavenly sanctuary before the Father himself.

But what exactly does this heavenly ministry entail? Some scholars have debated whether the author of Hebrews envisions Christ's atonement as completed entirely on the cross or as having an additional heavenly dimension. The most natural reading, I believe, is that the cross is the decisive atoning event — it is there that Christ "offered himself" and "bore the sins of many" — while his entry into the heavenly sanctuary represents the presentation and application of that finished work. He enters heaven "by means of his own blood" (9:12), not to offer a new sacrifice but to present the completed sacrifice before the Father. His heavenly ministry is one of ongoing intercession (7:25) based on his finished atoning work.

This has enormous pastoral significance, as the author makes clear:

"We have this as a sure and steadfast anchor of the soul, a hope that enters into the inner shrine behind the curtain, where Jesus has gone as a forerunner on our behalf, having become a high priest forever after the order of Melchizedek." (Hebrews 6:19–20, ESV)

"Therefore, brothers, since we have confidence to enter the holy places by the blood of Jesus, by the new and living way that he opened for us through the curtain, that is, through his flesh, and since we have a great priest over the house of God, let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith, with our hearts sprinkled clean from an evil conscience and our bodies washed with pure water." (Hebrews 10:19–22, ESV)

These are wonderful passages, full of confidence in what Christ has accomplished and rich with promise for believers. Under the old covenant, the veil of the temple blocked access to the Most Holy Place. Now Christ has opened "a new and living way" through that curtain. We can draw near to God — not with trembling and fear, but "with confidence," "in full assurance of faith," with hearts "sprinkled clean." The barrier has been removed. The separation has been overcome. The purpose of the atonement — reconciliation, access to God — has been achieved.²⁴

Multiple Atonement Motifs in Hebrews

One of the things I find most impressive about Hebrews is the way it weaves together so many different atonement motifs into a single, coherent argument. This epistle is not working with just one model of the atonement. It draws on virtually the full range of biblical atonement categories. Let us survey them:

Sacrifice: This is the dominant motif. Christ's death is presented as a sacrifice — the fulfillment and replacement of the entire Old Testament sacrificial system. He is the sacrifice to end all sacrifices. His blood is superior to the blood of animals. His offering accomplishes what theirs could only foreshadow (9:11–14, 23–26; 10:1–14).

Priestly mediation: Christ is the high priest who offers the sacrifice. He is a priest forever after the order of Melchizedek — superior to the Levitical priests in every way. He is sinless, permanent, and effective. He intercedes for us in the heavenly sanctuary (2:17; 4:14–16; 7:1–28; 8:1–2).

Propitiation: Christ makes "propitiation for the sins of the people" (2:17). As we have discussed, hilaskesthai involves both the cleansing of sin's defilement and the resolution of sin's judicial consequences before God.

Redemption and ransom: Christ secures "an eternal redemption" (9:12). His death "redeems" those under the first covenant from their transgressions (9:15). This is the language of liberation — of a price paid to set captives free.

Victory over the devil (Christus Victor): Christ partook of flesh and blood "that through death he might destroy the one who has the power of death, that is, the devil" (2:14). The cross is a victory over the evil powers that enslaved humanity.

Purification of conscience: The blood of Christ purifies "our conscience from dead works to serve the living God" (9:14). The atonement is not merely an objective, external transaction; it reaches into the depths of human subjectivity, cleansing the guilty conscience and enabling genuine worship.

Covenant inauguration: Christ is "the mediator of a new covenant" (9:15; 12:24). His death inaugurates the promised new covenant of Jeremiah 31, in which God writes his law on hearts and remembers sins no more.

Sin-bearing (substitution): Christ "was offered once to bear the sins of many" (9:28), echoing Isaiah 53:12. He takes upon himself what belongs to others — the guilt, the burden, the consequences of sin.

Engaging Objections: Is Hebrews Really Substitutionary?

Some scholars question whether Hebrews should be read through a substitutionary lens at all. Several objections deserve a fair hearing.

Objection 1: Hebrews emphasizes purification, not punishment. This is perhaps the most common objection. The argument runs like this: the dominant imagery in Hebrews is of cleansing and purification (katharismos, 1:3; 9:14, 22–23), not of punishment or penalty. The sacrifice of Christ is presented as dealing with contamination and defilement rather than with judicial guilt. Therefore, the background is expiation (removal of defilement) rather than penal substitution.

There is a kernel of truth here. Hebrews does emphasize purification language heavily. But this objection rests on a false dichotomy — the assumption that purification and judicial categories are mutually exclusive. In the Old Testament, they are not. The Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16) involved both the purification of the sanctuary from defilement and the removal of the people's guilt through the confession of sins over the scapegoat. As we argued in Chapter 5, these are complementary dimensions of one atonement, not competing alternatives. Similarly, in Hebrews, purification of conscience (9:14) and the forgiveness (aphesis) of sins (9:22; 10:18) go hand in hand. The blood of Christ both cleanses the worshiper and removes the judicial barrier that sin has created. Purification language does not exclude substitutionary and judicial categories; it works alongside them.²⁵

Objection 2: The sacrificial system was not about penal substitution. A related objection argues that the Levitical sacrifices themselves were not penal substitutes — the animals were not being punished in the sinner's place — and therefore the author of Hebrews, in drawing his analogies from those sacrifices, cannot be teaching penal substitution either. Hess makes a version of this argument, contending that the sacrificial victim was considered "most holy" in the Old Testament, not cursed or punished, and that the blood of sacrifice represents purification and consecration rather than penalty.²⁶

I have engaged this objection at length in Chapters 4 and 5, but several points bear repeating here. First, even if the Levitical sacrifices are primarily about purification, the fact remains that an animal dies in the sinner's place. Something is being done to the animal that should have been done to the sinner. The laying on of hands (semikah) — the ritual act by which the worshiper placed his hands on the head of the animal before it was killed — signifies identification and transfer (as argued in Chapter 4). The animal's death is connected to the sinner's guilt. Second, we should not assume that the author of Hebrews is merely reproducing the Old Testament categories without development. The New Testament authors, under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, develop and deepen the Old Testament imagery. Even if "penal substitution" is not the best label for what happens in Leviticus 4, the author of Hebrews may well see in Christ's sacrifice a deeper reality than what the animal sacrifices themselves contained. The fulfillment transcends the shadow.

Objection 3: Hebrews 2:14 shows a Christus Victor framework, not substitution. As we saw earlier, Hebrews 2:14 clearly presents Christ's death as a victory over the devil. Some scholars argue that this is the controlling framework for the entire epistle — the death of Christ is a battle, not a legal transaction.

But as I have been arguing throughout this book, victory and substitution are not competing categories. They work together. Christ defeats the devil precisely by bearing our sins and dying in our place. The mechanism of the victory is the substitutionary sacrifice. As Gustaf Aulén himself acknowledged (even while preferring the Christus Victor framework), the New Testament authors often combine victory and sacrifice language without any sense of contradiction.²⁷ In Hebrews, the victory over the devil (2:14) is accomplished "through death" — and the nature of that death is developed throughout the epistle as a substitutionary, propitiatory sacrifice. Victory is the result; substitution is the means.

Objection 4: Hebrews never explicitly says God punished Jesus. This is true, and it is worth acknowledging. The author of Hebrews does not use the word "punishment" in connection with Christ's death. He does not depict the Father pouring out wrath on the Son. His emphasis is on Christ's willing self-offering — "he offered himself" (7:27; 9:14) — not on the Father inflicting suffering.

I actually think this is consistent with the author's Trinitarian theology and with the position I am defending in this book. As I argued in the discussion of the author's core convictions (Chapter 1), the substitutionary heart of the atonement does not require the Father actively punishing the Son in a way that creates division within the Trinity. What it requires is that Christ voluntarily took upon himself the judicial consequences of our sin — death, separation, the weight of guilt — and dealt with them definitively. The author of Hebrews presents exactly this: Christ "bore the sins of many" (9:28), he "tasted death for everyone" (2:9), he made "propitiation for the sins of the people" (2:17). The judicial consequences of sin are real, and Christ bore them. Whether we call this "punishment" is, in some ways, a matter of theological vocabulary. What matters is the underlying reality: the innocent one bearing what the guilty deserved, so that the guilty could go free.²⁸

The "Once for All" Emphasis: Finality, Sufficiency, and Assurance

Before drawing this chapter to a close, I want to return to one of the most distinctive and pastorally important themes of Hebrews: the ephapax — the "once for all" character of Christ's sacrifice.

As Rutledge beautifully observes, this word ephapax was very important to the author of Hebrews and should be very important to us. It is repeated four times in the epistle (7:27; 9:12; 9:26; 10:10), and the related word hapax ("once") appears in 9:28.²⁹ Every time it appears, it carries the same powerful message: what Christ did on the cross is complete, final, unrepeatable, and fully sufficient. Nothing further can be done or needs to be done. Everything has changed now that Christ has made the once-for-all sacrifice of his own blood.

The pastoral implications of this are enormous. Under the old covenant, there was always another sacrifice to be offered — another Day of Atonement, another sin offering, another reminder that sin had not been finally dealt with. But under the new covenant, there is no more offering for sin (10:18). The work is finished. As Hebrews 10:14 puts it with breathtaking simplicity: "By a single offering he has perfected for all time those who are being sanctified."

For the believer who struggles with guilt, who wonders whether their sins have been truly forgiven, who fears that they have done something so terrible that it cannot be covered — the message of Hebrews is astonishingly good news. Christ's sacrifice was sufficient. It was enough. You do not need to add anything to it. You do not need to earn God's favor through your own efforts or religious performance. You simply need to come. "Let us draw near with a true heart in full assurance of faith" (10:22).

This is why Allen can summarize the entire argument of Hebrews in this way: if sinful people are ever to be brought into a right relationship with God, it must occur by means of a vicarious substitutionary offering in the place of the sinner — hence the foundational statement: "Without shedding of blood there is no remission" (9:22). Unlike the entire Old Testament sacrificial system, Jesus became both the priest and the sacrifice. He and he alone has appeared "in these last days" to "put away sin by the sacrifice of Himself" (9:26).³⁰

Hebrews 5:7–10 and 12:1–3: The Suffering and Obedient Son

Before concluding, we should briefly consider two additional passages that enrich the portrait of Christ's atoning work in Hebrews.

First, Hebrews 5:7–10:

"In the days of his flesh, Jesus offered up prayers and supplications, with loud cries and tears, to him who was able to save him from death, and he was heard because of his reverence. Although he was a Son, he learned obedience through what he suffered. And being made perfect, he became the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him, being designated by God a high priest after the order of Melchizedek." (Hebrews 5:7–10, ESV)

This passage, which Rutledge calls Hebrews' own version of the Gethsemane scene, brings us very close to the anguish of our Lord as he takes our sin upon himself.³¹ The "loud cries and tears" reveal the real human cost of the atonement. The Son of God did not approach the cross with stoic detachment. He felt its horror with a depth of feeling that we can barely imagine. And yet he went willingly. He "learned obedience through what he suffered" — not that he was ever disobedient, but that his obedience was tested and perfected through the fires of suffering. And the result? He became "the source of eternal salvation to all who obey him."

Second, Hebrews 12:1–2:

"Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses, let us also lay aside every weight, and sin which clings so closely, and let us run with endurance the race that is set before us, looking to Jesus, the founder and perfecter of our faith, who for the joy that was set before him endured the cross, despising the shame, and is seated at the right hand of the throne of God." (Hebrews 12:1–2, ESV)

Here is the motivation behind the sacrifice: "for the joy that was set before him." Jesus endured the cross not because he was forced to, but because he saw beyond it to the joy on the other side — the joy of redeeming a people, of accomplishing the Father's will, of bringing many sons and daughters to glory (2:10). He "despised the shame" — he looked at the humiliation and degradation of crucifixion and regarded it as worth enduring for the sake of what it would accomplish. And now he is "seated at the right hand of the throne of God" — the posture of completed work and triumphant reign.

This is the Son who willingly offered himself. This is not the portrait of a victim crushed against his will by an angry Father. This is the portrait of a warrior-king who chose the path of suffering because it was the only way to save those he loved.

Hebrews 13:10–16: The Sacrifice Outside the Gate

One final passage deserves attention. Near the end of the epistle, the author provides a striking image:

"We have an altar from which those who serve the tent have no right to eat. For the bodies of those animals whose blood is brought into the holy places by the high priest as a sacrifice for sin are burned outside the camp. So Jesus also suffered outside the gate in order to sanctify the people through his own blood. Therefore let us go to him outside the camp and bear the reproach he endured." (Hebrews 13:10–13, ESV)

On the Day of Atonement, the sin offering whose blood was brought into the Most Holy Place was not eaten by the priests as other sacrifices were. Instead, the carcass was burned "outside the camp" (Leviticus 16:27). This was a sign of the sin that had been placed upon it — it was removed from the holy space of the community. The author sees in this a prefiguration of Jesus' crucifixion "outside the gate" — outside the walls of Jerusalem. Jesus suffered outside the holy city, bearing the sin and reproach that belonged to others, in order to "sanctify the people through his own blood."³²

The sacrificial and substitutionary imagery is vivid. Jesus is the sin offering. His blood is brought into the heavenly sanctuary. His body suffers "outside the camp" — in the place of curse, rejection, and shame. And we are invited to follow him there — not to add to his sacrifice, but to share in his reproach, knowing that it is through his blood that we have been made holy.

Conclusion: The Definitive Sacrifice

The Epistle to the Hebrews gives us the most sustained, detailed, and architecturally ambitious reflection on the atonement in the New Testament. From its opening declaration that the Son has "made purification for sins" (1:3) to its final exhortation to "go to him outside the camp" (13:13), the epistle is a single, unified argument about the meaning and sufficiency of Christ's death.

What have we found? We have found that the author of Hebrews does not merely say that Jesus is like a sacrifice; he says that Jesus is the ultimate sacrifice that the entire Levitical system was pointing toward. We have found that Jesus is simultaneously the perfect high priest and the perfect offering — priest and victim united in one person. We have found that the earthly tabernacle was a shadow, but the heavenly sanctuary where Christ now ministers is the reality. We have found that the Old Testament sacrifices were repeated because they were insufficient, but Christ's sacrifice was once for all because it was fully effective. We have found that Christ entered the heavenly sanctuary with his own blood, securing an eternal redemption. And we have found that Christ was offered once to bear the sins of many — the language of substitutionary sin-bearing drawn directly from Isaiah 53.

We have also found that Hebrews weaves together multiple atonement motifs — sacrifice, propitiation, victory over the devil, redemption, purification, covenant inauguration, priestly intercession, and sin-bearing — into a unified whole. These are not competing models but complementary facets of one great reality. And at the heart of that reality, I believe, stands substitution. The entire logic of Hebrews is built on the idea that someone — the Son of God himself — has done for us what we could never do for ourselves. He stood in our place. He bore our sins. He dealt with our guilt. He opened the way into God's presence. He did it once, and he did it for all.

The message of Hebrews to every person who has ever felt the weight of guilt, the fear of death, or the sense of separation from God is gloriously simple: "Let us draw near" (10:22). The barrier has been removed. The sacrifice has been made. The High Priest is alive forevermore. Come.

Bibliography

Allen, David L. The Atonement: A Biblical, Theological, and Historical Study of the Cross of Christ. Nashville: B&H Academic, 2019.

Allen, David L. Hebrews. New American Commentary 35. Nashville: B&H, 2010.

Aulén, Gustaf. Christus Victor: An Historical Study of the Three Main Types of the Idea of Atonement. Translated by A. G. Hebert. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2003.

Gathercole, Simon. Defending Substitution: An Essay on Atonement in Paul. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2015.

Hess, William L. Crushing the Great Serpent: Did God Punish Jesus? 2024.

Lane, William L. Hebrews 9–13. Word Biblical Commentary 47B. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1991.

Lyonnet, Stanislas, and Léopold Sabourin. Sin, Redemption, and Sacrifice: A Biblical and Patristic Study. Rome: Pontifical Biblical Institute, 1970.

Morris, Leon. The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross. 3rd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1965.

Philippe de la Trinité. What Is Redemption? How Christ's Suffering Saves Us. Steubenville, OH: Emmaus Road, 2021.

Rutledge, Fleming. The Crucifixion: Understanding the Death of Jesus Christ. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2015.

Stott, John R. W. The Cross of Christ. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2006.