Previous Chapter | Table of Contents | Next Chapter

Chapter 17
Old Testament Foundations — God's Dealings with the Dead in the Hebrew Scriptures

Introduction

When we think about the biblical case for postmortem salvation, our minds naturally go to the New Testament—to Christ's descent to the dead, to Paul's sweeping declarations about cosmic reconciliation, to Peter's startling claim that the gospel was preached to those who had already died. And those texts are powerful, as we have seen in earlier chapters. But here is something I find genuinely fascinating: the seeds of these New Testament ideas are already planted deep in the soil of the Hebrew Scriptures. The Old Testament may not spell out a fully developed doctrine of postmortem salvation—we should not expect it to, given the progressive nature of biblical revelation—but it provides the essential foundations upon which such a doctrine can be built.

Think about it this way. If God's love truly does not stop at the grave, then we should expect to find hints of this truth scattered throughout the earliest stages of His self-revelation. And that is exactly what we find. The Hebrew Scriptures portray a God who is sovereign over the realm of the dead, who has the power to redeem from death, whose covenant faithfulness does not end when a person stops breathing, and whose ultimate plan includes not just Israel, but all the nations of the earth—a plan so grand that even death cannot stand in its way.

The thesis of this chapter is straightforward: the Old Testament, while not explicitly teaching a developed doctrine of postmortem salvation, provides important foundations for such a doctrine. These foundations include God's sovereignty over Sheol, His power to redeem from death, His faithfulness to covenant promises that transcend death, and prophetic visions of universal redemption that encompass even the dead. When we read these texts with fresh eyes—without the assumption that death permanently and irrevocably seals every person's eternal destiny—a remarkable picture emerges of a God whose saving reach extends even to the world of the departed.

I want to walk through this evidence carefully, section by section. We will begin with the Old Testament texts that proclaim God's authority over Sheol and death. Then we will examine the prophetic passages that look forward to the defeat of death itself. After that, we will trace the development of afterlife belief through the Hebrew Scriptures and explore how this progressive revelation relates to the postmortem opportunity thesis. We will then turn to the stunning prophetic visions that envision the universal worship of God by all nations. Finally, we will consider the fascinating question of what happened to the Old Testament saints who lived and died before Christ.

I. God's Sovereignty over Sheol and Death

Before we can talk about God saving people after death, we need to establish something fundamental: Does God even have authority in the realm of the dead? Can His power reach into Sheol—that mysterious underworld where the Old Testament says the dead reside? If death is a boundary that even God cannot or will not cross, then the entire postmortem opportunity thesis collapses before it begins. But if God is sovereign over Sheol—if His presence, His power, and His love extend into the very place of the dead—then the door remains wide open.

The Old Testament answers this question with resounding clarity. God is not absent from Sheol. He is not powerless there. His authority over the realm of the dead is one of the most consistently affirmed truths in the Hebrew Scriptures. Let us look at the key passages.

Psalm 16:10 — "You Will Not Abandon My Soul to Sheol"

The first text we should consider is Psalm 16:10. In its immediate context, David writes with confidence about God's care for him even in the face of death:

"For you will not abandon my soul to Sheol, or let your holy one see corruption." (Psalm 16:10, ESV)

The Hebrew word translated "abandon" here is azab (עָזַב), which means to leave behind, forsake, or desert. David is expressing a profound trust that God will not simply leave him in Sheol—the realm of the dead—as though God's care for His people ended at the grave. The word nephesh (נֶפֶשׁ), translated "soul," refers to David's very self, his inner being, the core of who he is.1 And Sheol (שְׁאוֹל) is the Hebrew term for the abode of the dead—not a specific place of punishment, but the shadowy underworld where all the dead were believed to go in early Israelite thought.2

Now, the New Testament makes clear that this psalm finds its ultimate fulfillment in Jesus Christ. Peter quotes this very verse in his Pentecost sermon in Acts 2:27, arguing that David was speaking prophetically about the Messiah whose body would not see decay because God would raise Him from the dead.3 That Christological fulfillment is important, and we explored it in Chapter 13's treatment of the descent passages. But we should not let that overshadow the psalm's significance in its own Old Testament context.

Even at the level of David's own experience, this text reveals something profound about God's relationship to Sheol. David assumes that God can act in Sheol. He assumes that God has the power to not abandon someone there. This only makes sense if God's authority extends into the realm of the dead. If Sheol were completely outside of God's reach, David's prayer would be meaningless—like asking a lifeguard to rescue someone in a country he has never visited. But David trusts that God's saving power operates even in the place of the dead.

Key Point: Psalm 16:10 presupposes that God's power extends into Sheol and that He is able—and willing—to act on behalf of those who are there. This is a crucial Old Testament foundation for the postmortem opportunity thesis: if God can rescue from Sheol, then death does not mark the absolute end of His saving activity.

Psalm 49:15 — "God Will Ransom My Soul from the Power of Sheol"

Psalm 49 is a wisdom psalm that meditates on the universal reality of death. Rich and poor alike face the grave. No amount of wealth can buy a person's way out of death. And yet, in the midst of this sober reflection, the psalmist makes a stunning declaration of hope:

"But God will ransom my soul from the power of Sheol, for he will receive me." (Psalm 49:15, ESV)

The word translated "ransom" is padah (פָּדָה), a term rich with the imagery of redemption—paying a price to set someone free. It is used elsewhere of God redeeming Israel from slavery in Egypt (Deuteronomy 7:8) and of God redeeming individuals from distress and oppression (Psalm 34:22). The psalmist is saying that God will buy back his soul from the grip of Sheol. And the phrase "from the power of Sheol" uses the Hebrew yad (יָד), literally "from the hand of Sheol"—as if Sheol were a captor holding the dead in its grasp, and God were strong enough to wrench them free.4

This is extraordinary language. The psalmist does not merely say that God will prevent him from going to Sheol. He says that God will ransom him from Sheol—implying that even after death has done its work, God's redemptive power can still operate. God can reach into the very domain of death and bring a person out.

I think the implications for postmortem opportunity are significant. If God has the power to ransom a soul from Sheol's grip, then death is not the impenetrable barrier that many theologians have claimed. God's saving activity is not confined to this side of the grave. He is the one who holds the keys to death and Hades (Revelation 1:18)—and the Old Testament already hints at this truth centuries before Christ.

Psalm 139:8 — "If I Make My Bed in Sheol, You Are There"

Perhaps the most breathtaking declaration of God's presence in the realm of the dead comes in Psalm 139, David's soaring meditation on God's omnipresence and omniscience:

"Where shall I go from your Spirit? Or where shall I flee from your presence? If I ascend to heaven, you are there! If I make my bed in Sheol, you are there!" (Psalm 139:7–8, ESV)

As we noted briefly in Chapter 16, this text affirms that there is literally nowhere in the created order—not the heights of heaven nor the depths of Sheol—where a person can escape God's presence.5 But here I want to focus on what this means specifically in the Old Testament context of Sheol and the dead.

The Hebrew is emphatic. David uses the word hinneka (הִנֶּךָּ)—"behold, you!" It is a word of surprise, of marvel. Even there—in the darkest, most remote place imaginable, the land of the dead itself—God is present. His Spirit is not absent from Sheol. His presence does not stop at the boundary of death.

Now, this raises a question that I believe is crucial for our entire discussion. Given what we know about God's character—His relentless love (Chapter 2), His universal salvific will (Chapter 4), His desire that none should perish (2 Peter 3:9)—what is the nature of God's presence in Sheol? Is God present in Sheol but passive, indifferent, doing nothing? That hardly fits the portrait of God we encounter throughout the rest of Scripture. The God who leaves the ninety-nine sheep to find the one that is lost (Luke 15:4) does not suddenly become passive when that lost sheep crosses the threshold of death.

If God is present in Sheol, He is present with salvific intent. His presence is never merely passive. When God is present, He is present as the God who saves, who redeems, who draws people to Himself. As R. Zachary Manis argues in his divine presence model, God's very presence is the most powerful reality in the universe—and those who encounter it will be profoundly affected, whether for salvation or judgment.6 Psalm 139:8 tells us that the dead are not beyond the reach of this presence.

Hosea 13:14 — "I Will Ransom Them from the Power of Sheol"

Hosea 13:14 is one of the most dramatic declarations of God's victory over death in the entire Old Testament:

"I shall ransom them from the power of Sheol; I shall redeem them from Death. O Death, where are your plagues? O Sheol, where is your sting?" (Hosea 13:14, ESV)

The Hebrew here is bold and confrontational. God is challenging Death and Sheol as though they were enemies to be defeated—taunting them, daring them to resist His redemptive power. The verb padah (פָּדָה, "ransom") appears again, along with ga'al (גָּאַל, "redeem"), the term used for the kinsman-redeemer in the book of Ruth—the one who has both the right and the obligation to rescue a family member from bondage.7

The significance of Hosea 13:14 extends well beyond its immediate context. Paul cites this very passage in 1 Corinthians 15:55, triumphantly declaring that in Christ's resurrection, the sting of death and the victory of Sheol have been abolished.8 As we discussed in Chapter 15 (where the Pauline appropriation is treated in full), Paul transforms Hosea's declaration into a proclamation of Christ's universal victory over death itself. But note: Paul did not invent this hope out of thin air. He found it already embedded in the Hebrew Scriptures. The Old Testament had already declared that God would ransom from Sheol and redeem from death. Christ's resurrection was the fulfillment of a promise that had been echoing through Israel's prophetic tradition for centuries.

As William Harrison observes, Hosea 13:14 was cited by early Christians as evidence for Christ's descent to the dead and His liberating work among those held captive in Sheol. If God truly ransoms from the power of Sheol, then the dead are not beyond the scope of His redemptive activity.9

II. Death Conquered — Prophetic Visions of Resurrection and Hope

Having established that God's power extends into Sheol, we can now turn to the prophetic passages that look forward to something even more astonishing: the actual defeat of death itself. These texts move beyond simply affirming God's presence in Sheol; they envision a day when God will destroy death altogether, raise the dead, and establish a world where death no longer has any power. These are the passages that lay the groundwork for the New Testament's proclamation that in Christ, death has been conquered once and for all.

Isaiah 25:6–8 — "He Will Swallow Up Death Forever"

Isaiah 25:6–8 is one of the most magnificent passages in the entire Old Testament. It paints a picture of God's eschatological banquet—a feast for all peoples, hosted by God Himself on His holy mountain:

"On this mountain the LORD of hosts will make for all peoples a feast of rich food, a feast of well-aged wine, of rich food full of marrow, of aged wine well refined. And he will swallow up on this mountain the covering that is cast over all peoples, the veil that is spread over all nations. He will swallow up death forever, and the Lord GOD will wipe away tears from all faces, and the reproach of his people he will take away from all the earth, for the LORD has spoken." (Isaiah 25:6–8, ESV)

There are several features of this passage that demand our attention. First, notice the scope. This feast is not for Israel alone—it is for "all peoples" and "all nations." The Hebrew kol-ha'ammim (כָּל־הָעַמִּים) and kol-haggoyim (כָּל־הַגּוֹיִם) are as inclusive as language can be. Whatever God is doing on this mountain, He is doing it for the whole human race.10

Second, notice what God destroys. He "swallows up the covering" that shrouds the nations—a veil of spiritual blindness and ignorance. And then the climactic declaration: "He will swallow up death forever." The Hebrew billa hammavet lanetsach (בִּלַּע הַמָּוֶת לָנֶצַח) literally means that God will consume, devour, or annihilate death permanently. Death is treated here as an enemy that God will decisively defeat.11

Third, notice the universal comfort: God will "wipe away tears from all faces." Not just from Israel's faces. From all faces. The Hebrew kol-panim (כָּל־פָּנִים) reiterates the universal scope.

Paul cites this very text in 1 Corinthians 15:54 when he declares that in the resurrection, "Death is swallowed up in victory." And the book of Revelation echoes it in 21:4: "He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more." But the original promise belongs to Isaiah—and in its Old Testament context, it is already a vision of God's saving work that encompasses all peoples and all nations, removing the very specter of death that separates humanity from God.

How could God truly be said to have swallowed up death forever if billions of people remain permanently separated from Him because they died without hearing the gospel? As Harrison asks, how can it be said that God has the victory over death if billions remain in its grip forever?12 Isaiah 25:6–8, read on its own terms, envisions a comprehensive victory over death that includes the salvation of people from every nation.

Isaiah 26:19 — "Your Dead Shall Live"

Just one chapter later, Isaiah records another extraordinary promise:

"Your dead shall live; their bodies shall rise. You who dwell in the dust, awake and sing for joy! For your dew is a dew of light, and the earth will give birth to the dead." (Isaiah 26:19, ESV)

This is one of the clearest expressions of bodily resurrection hope in the Old Testament. The language is vivid and concrete: the dead will live, bodies will rise, those who dwell in the dust of death will awake and sing. The Hebrew yequmun (יְקוּמוּן, "they shall rise") uses the same root as the word commonly associated with resurrection (qum, קוּם). And "the earth will give birth to the dead" uses the image of the ground yielding up its dead as a woman gives birth—a picture of new life emerging from what appeared to be permanent death.13

The Old Testament prophets frequently used the imagery of death and resurrection metaphorically to describe Israel's exile and restoration (see especially Ezekiel 37 below and Hosea 6:2). But Isaiah 26:19 pushes beyond mere metaphor. In its eschatological context—nestled within the "Isaiah Apocalypse" of chapters 24–27—this text points toward an actual resurrection of the dead, a day when God's saving power will extend even to those who have died.14

For our purposes, the significance is this: if the dead shall live, if bodies shall rise, if those in the dust will awake—then death is not the final word. God's saving purposes extend beyond the grave. The God of Isaiah 26:19 is a God who refuses to let death have the last say.

Ezekiel 37:1–14 — The Valley of Dry Bones

Few passages in the Old Testament are more vivid or more dramatic than Ezekiel's vision of the valley of dry bones:

"The hand of the LORD was upon me, and he brought me out in the Spirit of the LORD and set me down in the middle of the valley; it was full of bones. And he led me around among them, and behold, there were very many on the surface of the valley, and behold, they were very dry. And he said to me, 'Son of man, can these bones live?' And I answered, 'O Lord GOD, you know.' Then he said to me, 'Prophesy over these bones, and say to them, O dry bones, hear the word of the LORD. Thus says the Lord GOD to these bones: Behold, I will cause breath to enter you, and you shall live. And I will lay sinews upon you, and will cause flesh to come upon you, and cover you with skin, and put breath in you, and you shall live, and you shall know that I am the LORD.'" (Ezekiel 37:1–6, ESV)

Ezekiel goes on to describe how he prophesied as commanded, and the bones came together, received flesh and skin, and the breath (ruach, רוּחַ—the same word for "spirit" and "wind") entered them and they lived, standing on their feet as a vast army (37:7–10). God then interprets the vision: "Son of man, these bones are the whole house of Israel" (37:11). The vision, in its primary context, is about the restoration of the nation of Israel from the "death" of exile.15

But here is what fascinates me. Even though the immediate referent is national restoration, the imagery Ezekiel uses is explicitly the imagery of resurrection from the dead. God takes completely dead, dried-out bones and brings them back to life. The underlying theological assumption is staggering: there is nothing so dead that God cannot restore it to life. No situation is so hopeless, no death so final, that it lies beyond the reach of God's life-giving Spirit.

Robin Parry observes that the Old Testament prophets frequently portrayed Israel's exile in terms of metaphorical death and resurrection, and Ezekiel 37 is the supreme example of this pattern.16 This is significant because it reveals a theological principle embedded in Israel's experience: God's pattern with His people is judgment followed by restoration, death followed by life, exile followed by return. And if this is God's pattern with Israel, we have reason to ask: might it also be God's pattern with all of humanity?

Theological Principle: Ezekiel 37 reveals a God whose power over death is absolute. There is nothing so dead—no bones so dry, no situation so hopeless—that God cannot bring new life. This "death-then-life" pattern runs throughout the Old Testament narrative and provides a foundation for the hope that God's saving purposes extend even to those who have died.

Daniel 12:2 — The Resurrection to Life and Judgment

Daniel 12:2 is widely recognized as the clearest Old Testament text on bodily resurrection:

"And many of those who sleep in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt." (Daniel 12:2, ESV)

This text, coming at the very end of the Old Testament prophetic era, represents the most developed expression of resurrection hope in the Hebrew Scriptures. Several features deserve attention. The dead are described as "sleeping" in the dust—a metaphor that implies their state is temporary, not permanent. To "sleep" is to be in a condition from which one can be awakened. The dust of the earth echoes Genesis 3:19 ("you are dust, and to dust you shall return"), suggesting that the resurrection reverses the curse of death itself.17

The word "many" (rabbim, רַבִּים) in Hebrew is often debated. Some scholars argue it can function as an equivalent to "all" in certain contexts, paralleling the way Paul uses "the many" (hoi polloi, οἱ πολλοί) in Romans 5:15–19 to mean "all people." Others take it as a genuine limitation—not all will be raised, but many.18 Either way, the text affirms that a significant resurrection of the dead will occur.

The phrase "everlasting contempt" uses the Hebrew dira'on olam (דִּרְאוֹן עוֹלָם). As we discuss at length in Chapter 20, the word olam (עוֹלָם) does not necessarily mean "eternal" in the modern sense of "never-ending." It is an "age" word that refers to a long, indefinite duration—an age, an era—whose precise length depends on context.19 George Hurd points out that this shame and contempt is emotional pain, not physical torment—the "unjust" will see their shameful condition before God. Notably, this is the first reference in the entire Old Testament to any kind of punishment after death, and even here the punishment described is not physical fire but the emotional anguish of self-contempt.20

For the postmortem opportunity thesis, Daniel 12:2 is significant for two reasons. First, it affirms that death is not the end—God will raise the dead for a day of reckoning. Second, it opens the door to the possibility that the final judgment is not merely a sentencing ceremony but a genuine encounter with God (as we argue in Chapter 33), where the shame and contempt experienced by the wicked could serve a corrective purpose—leading at least some to repentance.

Job 19:25–27 — "I Know That My Redeemer Lives"

Job's declaration in the midst of his suffering is one of the most moving confessions of faith in the entire Bible:

"For I know that my Redeemer lives, and at the last he will stand upon the earth. And after my skin has been thus destroyed, yet in my flesh I shall see God, whom I shall see for myself, and my eyes shall behold, and not another. My heart faints within me!" (Job 19:25–27, ESV)

The Hebrew word for "Redeemer" here is go'el (גֹּאֵל)—the same kinsman-redeemer concept we encountered in Hosea 13:14. Job calls God his go'el, the one who has the right and the obligation to vindicate him. And Job's confidence is astonishing: even after his skin is destroyed—even after death has done its worst—he will see God. Not through an intermediary, not through someone else's eyes, but with his own eyes: "whom I shall see for myself."21

Scholars debate whether Job is expressing hope in bodily resurrection or simply in vindication before death. But the language "after my skin has been thus destroyed" strongly suggests a post-mortem context—a hope that extends beyond the grave. Job's confession anticipates what the later prophets would make more explicit: that the relationship between God and His people does not end at death, and that a personal encounter with God awaits even those who have passed through the valley of the shadow of death.

What strikes me most about this passage is Job's certainty: "I know that my Redeemer lives." Even in the depths of his suffering, even when everything seemed to suggest that God had abandoned him, Job held fast to the conviction that God would ultimately vindicate him—even beyond death. This is the same kind of hope that the postmortem opportunity thesis rests upon: the conviction that God's redemptive love does not stop at the grave, and that every person will ultimately have the chance to see God face to face.

III. The Development of Afterlife Belief in the Old Testament

One of the most important observations about the Old Testament's witness to life after death is that it develops over time. The Hebrew Scriptures do not present a single, fully formed doctrine of the afterlife from the very beginning. Instead, we see a gradual unfolding—what theologians call "progressive revelation"—from a shadowy, undeveloped understanding of Sheol to an increasingly clear hope in resurrection and final judgment. I believe this pattern of progressive revelation is itself evidence that supports the postmortem opportunity thesis.

The Earliest Stage: Sheol as the Shadowy Abode of the Dead

In the earliest strata of the Old Testament, Sheol is depicted simply as the place where the dead go—all the dead, righteous and wicked alike. It is the "underworld," the realm beneath the earth where the departed reside in a diminished, shadowy existence. Genesis uses the concept when Jacob mourns the supposed loss of Joseph: "I shall go down to Sheol to my son, mourning" (Genesis 37:35). There is no hint of judgment or reward here—only the universal reality that all who die descend to Sheol.22

As Harrison observes, the Old Testament's usage of Sheol shows it was understood as the afterlife entered into upon death, a place connected to the underworld that people "descended" into. While it sometimes overlaps with the concept of the physical grave (since literal death is the entryway to Sheol), the primary meaning is not simply "the grave" but the actual abode of the departed.23 Deuteronomy 32:22 even refers to the "lowest part" of Sheol, suggesting it may have different regions or levels—a concept that would develop further in later Jewish and Christian theology.

At this early stage, there is little in the way of hope for the dead. But neither is there a firm declaration that the dead are beyond God's reach. The very fact that all go to Sheol—both the righteous and the wicked—means that Sheol is not itself a place of final punishment. It is a waiting place, a temporary state. And as we saw from Psalm 139:8, even in Sheol, God is present.

The Middle Stage: Hints of Differentiation and Hope

As Israel's understanding developed, we begin to see hints that the experience of the dead in Sheol is not uniform. First Samuel 2:6 declares, "The LORD kills and brings to life; he brings down to Sheol and raises up." This remarkable statement, from the prayer of Hannah, affirms both God's sovereignty over death and His power to reverse it. Similarly, 2 Samuel 22:6 speaks of the "cords of Sheol" entangling David, from which God delivered him—a metaphorical expression, perhaps, but one that reinforces the idea that God's saving power can reach into the realm of death.24

The Psalms represent a significant development. As we have already seen, Psalm 16:10, Psalm 49:15, and Psalm 139:8 all affirm God's authority over Sheol in increasingly explicit terms. The psalmists are beginning to articulate a hope that God's relationship with the righteous does not end at death—that God will not simply abandon His people to the underworld forever.

The Wisdom Literature adds further nuance. Job's cry "I know that my Redeemer lives" (Job 19:25) and his hope to see God even after his flesh is destroyed represent an emerging conviction that the God-human relationship survives death. And while Ecclesiastes can sound pessimistic about the afterlife ("the dead know nothing," 9:5), this should be understood as the author's reflection on death as observed from an earthly, "under the sun" perspective—not as a definitive theological statement about the eternal condition of the dead.25

The Later Stage: Resurrection Hope

By the time we reach the prophets, especially the later prophets, the hope for resurrection has become far more explicit. Isaiah 25:6–8 envisions the destruction of death itself. Isaiah 26:19 declares that the dead will live and their bodies will rise. Ezekiel 37 portrays God raising an entire valley of dried bones back to life. And Daniel 12:2 speaks of a future day when the dead will awake—some to everlasting life and some to shame.

This progressive development is significant for our thesis in several ways. First, it demonstrates that God reveals truth gradually. The full picture of the afterlife was not available to the earliest biblical writers. This means we should expect later revelation (especially the New Testament) to develop and clarify what the Old Testament only hints at—including the possibility of postmortem salvation.26

Second, the progressive development shows that God's revelation consistently moves in the direction of greater hope, not less. The trajectory is from shadowy Sheol with no hope, to the psalmists' trust that God will not abandon the righteous in Sheol, to the prophets' vision of resurrection and the defeat of death, to the New Testament's proclamation that Christ has conquered death and has the keys of Hades. Each stage offers more hope than the last. It would be strange indeed if the final stage of revelation—the New Testament—were to abruptly reverse this trajectory by declaring that death irrevocably seals every person's fate with no further possibility of grace.

The Trajectory of Revelation: The Old Testament's progressive revelation of the afterlife consistently moves in the direction of greater hope: from Sheol with no hope → to God's presence in Sheol → to God's power to ransom from Sheol → to the prophetic hope of resurrection → to the defeat of death itself. The postmortem opportunity thesis represents a natural continuation of this trajectory, not a departure from it.

Third, as Beilby rightly observes, the underdeveloped nature of personal eschatology in the Old Testament makes it difficult to draw firm conclusions about the possibility of postmortem opportunity directly from Old Testament texts. But this very underdevelopment means that the Old Testament neither affirms nor denies the possibility. It leaves the question open—and the hints it does provide (God's presence in Sheol, His power to ransom from death, the prophetic hope of universal salvation) all point in the direction of a God whose saving activity is not confined by death.27

IV. Prophetic Visions of Universal Salvation

We turn now to one of the most remarkable—and often overlooked—features of the Old Testament: the prophetic vision of a day when all nations, not just Israel, will come to know and worship the one true God. These passages envision a scope of salvation that is breathtaking in its universality. And when we read them in light of the postmortem opportunity thesis, they take on new significance—for if God truly intends to draw all nations to Himself, the question of what happens to the countless millions who never heard of Him during their earthly lives becomes unavoidable.

Isaiah 2:2–4 — "All Nations Shall Flow to It"

Isaiah 2 opens with one of the most magnificent visions of the future in all of Scripture:

"It shall come to pass in the latter days that the mountain of the house of the LORD shall be established as the highest of the mountains, and shall be lifted up above the hills; and all the nations shall flow to it, and many peoples shall come, and say: 'Come, let us go up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob, that he may teach us his ways and that we may walk in his paths.' For out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem. He shall judge between the nations, and shall decide disputes for many peoples; and they shall beat their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks; nation shall not lift up sword against nation, neither shall they learn war anymore." (Isaiah 2:2–4, ESV)

The image is stunning: all nations streaming toward God's holy mountain, drawn by the desire to learn His ways and walk in His paths. The Hebrew kol-haggoyim (כָּל־הַגּוֹיִם, "all the nations") is comprehensive. This is not a vision of a few Gentile converts joining Israel; it is a vision of a world-wide pilgrimage of the nations to the God of Israel.28

What is the relationship between this future vision and the historical reality that most of these nations never came to worship Israel's God during the Old Testament period? Many of these nations had already ceased to exist by the time of Christ. If this prophecy is to be fulfilled—if all nations truly will flow to God's mountain—then its fulfillment must extend beyond the normal span of earthly life. It must encompass those who lived and died without ever hearing of the God of Israel. And this, I would suggest, is precisely what the postmortem opportunity thesis provides: a framework in which God's universal purposes can be fulfilled for all peoples, including those who never had the opportunity to respond to Him during their earthly lives.

Isaiah 19:23–25 — Egypt and Assyria Blessed Alongside Israel

If Isaiah 2 is stunning, Isaiah 19:23–25 is positively shocking. After a lengthy oracle of judgment against Egypt, the prophet envisions a day when Israel's archetypal enemies—Egypt and Assyria—will be reconciled to God and to Israel:

"In that day there will be a highway from Egypt to Assyria, and Assyria will come into Egypt, and Egypt into Assyria, and the Egyptians will worship with the Assyrians. In that day Israel will be the third with Egypt and Assyria, a blessing in the midst of the earth, whom the LORD of hosts has blessed, saying, 'Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel my inheritance.'" (Isaiah 19:23–25, ESV)

Read those last words again slowly: "Blessed be Egypt my people, and Assyria the work of my hands, and Israel my inheritance." God takes the very titles that were Israel's exclusive property—"my people," "the work of my hands," "my inheritance"—and applies them to Israel's worst enemies. Egypt, the nation that enslaved Israel for four hundred years! Assyria, the empire that devastated the northern kingdom and carried its people into exile! These are not friendly neighbors. These are the nations that represent everything hostile to Israel's faith and identity.29

Robin Parry highlights the extraordinary pattern in this passage: God strikes Egypt, and then He heals them. "The LORD will strike Egypt with a plague; he will strike them and heal them. They will turn to the LORD, and he will respond to their pleas and heal them" (Isaiah 19:22). This is the pattern for the nations as it was with Israel—judgment followed by healing, destruction followed by restoration. What is astonishing is the manner of the healing: Israel's arch-enemies convert to the service of Yahweh and worship Him on an equal footing with Israel herself.30

The implications for our thesis are significant. If God's plan includes the salvation of nations that were historically hostile to His people—nations that by the time of Christ had long since ceased to exist in their ancient forms—then His saving purposes clearly extend beyond what is possible within the earthly lifetimes of the individuals who made up those nations. God's plan is bigger than any one generation, bigger than any one nation's history, and bigger than death itself.

Isaiah 45:22–24 — "Every Knee Shall Bow"

Isaiah 45:22–24 contains one of the most important declarations of God's universal saving purpose in the entire Old Testament:

"Turn to me and be saved, all the ends of the earth! For I am God, and there is no other. By myself I have sworn; from my mouth has gone out in righteousness a word that shall not return: 'To me every knee shall bow, every tongue shall swear allegiance.' Only in the LORD, it shall be said of me, are righteousness and strength; to him shall come and be ashamed all who were incensed against him." (Isaiah 45:22–24, ESV)

This passage is treated in full in Chapter 14, where we examined its New Testament appropriation in Philippians 2:9–11 and Romans 14:11. Here I want to focus on its significance in its original Old Testament context. Several things stand out.

First, the passage begins with an invitation: "Turn to me and be saved, all the ends of the earth!" God is inviting all peoples—not just Israel—to turn to Him for salvation. The scope is universal.31

Second, this invitation is accompanied by a divine oath: "By myself I have sworn; from my mouth has gone out in righteousness a word that shall not return." God swears by Himself—the most solemn oath possible—that every knee will bow and every tongue will swear allegiance to Him. As Parry observes, the power of Yahweh's word is a pervasive theme in Second Isaiah. This word lasts forever (40:8) and will not return to God without accomplishing its purpose (55:10–11). It is therefore not possible that this divine oath could remain unfulfilled.32

Third, notice what the people will say: "Only in the LORD are righteousness and strength." As Harrison points out, this is saving faith. To trust in the Lord alone for righteousness is to trust in Him for justification—to recognize that only through God can one be made right.33 This is not mere forced submission; it is a genuine confession of faith.

Now, in its original Old Testament context, this vision likely refers to the survivors of the nations—those who are alive at the time of God's eschatological intervention. Parry acknowledges that the Old Testament does not envision the salvation of all individuals who have ever lived, because at this early stage of revelation, there was no developed concept of life after death (apart from Daniel 12:2, which comes at the very end of the Old Testament period).34 But Paul expands on this vision in Philippians 2:10 by adding the crucial words "under the earth"—meaning the dead. In Paul's hands, the scope of Isaiah's divine oath now includes not just the living but the dead as well. Every knee—in heaven, on earth, and under the earth—will bow.

This is a perfect example of how progressive revelation works. The Old Testament plants the seed; the New Testament brings it to full flower. Isaiah's vision of universal worship is already breathtaking, but when Paul expands it to include the dead, it becomes a powerful foundation for the postmortem opportunity thesis.

Zechariah 14:9 — "The LORD Will Be King over All the Earth"

The prophet Zechariah adds one more piece to the mosaic of universal hope:

"And the LORD will be king over all the earth. On that day the LORD will be one and his name one." (Zechariah 14:9, ESV)

This brief but powerful declaration envisions a day when God's sovereignty will be universally recognized—not just in Israel, but over all the earth. The Hebrew kol-ha'arets (כָּל־הָאָרֶץ) is comprehensive: all the earth, the entire world, with no exceptions. On that day, there will be no more competing gods, no more idolatry, no more spiritual blindness. The one true God will be acknowledged as King by all.35

Zechariah 14 also contains another fascinating detail. Earlier in the chapter (14:2–5), the prophet describes a catastrophic judgment involving the nations. But the chapter does not end with judgment—it ends with worship. After the purging and refining, the survivors of the nations will go up year after year to worship the LORD (14:16). The pattern is again judgment followed by restoration, destruction followed by healing—the same pattern we saw in Isaiah 19.

Isaiah 24:21–22 — A "Visitation" of the Imprisoned Dead

One additional passage deserves mention here, though it is less frequently discussed. Isaiah 24:21–22 contains a striking image:

"On that day the LORD will punish the host of heaven, in heaven, and the kings of the earth, on the earth. They will be gathered together as prisoners in a pit; they will be shut up in a prison, and after many days they will be visited." (Isaiah 24:21–22, ESV; cf. KJV)

The word translated "visited" in the KJV and some other versions is the Hebrew paqad (פָּקַד), which can mean "to visit," "to attend to," "to bring to account," or even "to bring deliverance." It is the same word used of God "visiting" His people in contexts of both judgment and salvation. As Beilby notes, this passage refers to a "visitation" of those who have been imprisoned—a visitation that occurs "after many days," suggesting it takes place long after the initial punishment began.36

Beilby also observes that from an evidential standpoint, the difficulty with these Old Testament passages comes from the underdeveloped nature of personal eschatology in the Hebrew Scriptures. But even so, Isaiah 24:21–22 at least hints at the possibility that those who are punished and imprisoned will not remain so forever—that a divine "visitation" awaits them, a visitation that could include the opportunity for redemption.37

Summary of Prophetic Vision: The Old Testament prophets envision a day when (1) all nations will stream to God's mountain to worship Him (Isaiah 2:2–4); (2) even Israel's worst enemies will be called "my people" and "the work of my hands" (Isaiah 19:23–25); (3) every knee will bow and every tongue will confess God's lordship (Isaiah 45:22–24); (4) God will be king over all the earth (Zechariah 14:9); and (5) those imprisoned in judgment will receive a divine "visitation" (Isaiah 24:21–22). Taken together, these texts paint a picture of a God whose saving purposes are cosmic in scope and not limited by death.

V. The Fate of Pre-Christ Believers: A Test Case for Postmortem Opportunity

We come now to a question that I believe is one of the most powerful arguments for postmortem salvific opportunity: What happened to the Old Testament saints—Abraham, Moses, David, and the rest—who lived and died before Christ's death and resurrection? And even more pressing: What about the countless people who lived during the Old Testament era but had no knowledge of the messianic promise at all? These questions force us to confront the logic of our theology, and the answers we give have enormous implications for the postmortem opportunity thesis.

The Standard Evangelical Answer — and Its Problems

The standard evangelical answer to the question of Old Testament saints is that they were saved by faith—the same kind of faith that saves people today—but that the content of their faith was different. Abraham did not know about Jesus of Nazareth, the cross, or the resurrection. He simply believed God's promises and it was "counted to him as righteousness" (Genesis 15:6; Romans 4:3). As Charles Ryrie put it, "The basis of salvation in every age is the death of Christ; the requirement for salvation in every age is faith; and the object of faith in every age is God," even though "the content of faith changed in every dispensation."38

This answer works reasonably well for figures like Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, who received direct revelation from God. It works for Moses, who spoke with God face to face. It works for David and the prophets, who were inspired by the Holy Spirit. But it raises serious questions when we push beyond the boundaries of Israel's covenant community.

What about Melchizedek—the "priest of God Most High" (Genesis 14:18) who blessed Abraham and apparently worshipped the same God, but without any of the special revelation that Abraham received? What about Job, who is presented as a righteous man from the land of Uz—apparently outside the Israelite covenant? What about Jethro, the priest of Midian, called a "friend of God" (Exodus 2:18)? What about the Queen of Sheba, Rahab the Canaanite, and Ruth the Moabitess? These so-called "holy pagans" are consistently presented in Scripture as genuine recipients of God's grace—and yet they had little or no access to Israel's special revelation.39

As Beilby argues, the salvation of pre-messianic believers demonstrates that faith is not primarily about having correct theological content. It is about one's "directional vector" toward God—a posture of trust and surrender toward the God who is revealing Himself, however much or little one understands. Hebrews 11 teaches that Abraham was saved by faith, but it is extremely difficult to explain how Abraham's faith included belief in Jesus Christ in any explicit sense.40

The Problem Intensifies: What About Those Outside Israel?

The problem becomes even more acute when we consider the vast majority of people who lived during the Old Testament era. Abraham, Moses, and the patriarchs were the exceptions—they received direct divine revelation. But what about the millions of people living in China, India, sub-Saharan Africa, the Americas, and countless other regions during the Old Testament period? These people had no access to the God of Israel, no knowledge of the messianic promise, no Scripture, and no prophets. They lived and died in complete ignorance of the God who loved them.

If we say that salvation requires explicit knowledge of and faith in the God of Israel (or later, in Jesus Christ), then these people had absolutely no chance. Zero. They were born in the wrong place and the wrong time, and their eternal destiny was sealed before they ever took their first breath. I find this picture deeply troubling—and so do many other evangelical theologians, as Beilby's extensive treatment of the unevangelized demonstrates.41

The inclusivist response—that God can save people through general revelation and the work of the Holy Spirit even without explicit knowledge of Christ—goes partway toward solving the problem. And as Stephen Jonathan documents, there is a long tradition of Christian thinkers, from Justin Martyr to John Wesley, who have affirmed that the saving work of Christ extends beyond those who explicitly know about it.42 But inclusivism, as traditionally formulated, only applies to those who are still alive. It does not address what happens to those who die without having responded to God.

This is where postmortem opportunity becomes crucial. If God is truly fair, truly loving, and truly committed to the salvation of all who will respond to Him (as argued in Chapter 2), then a postmortem opportunity provides the only satisfactory answer to the problem of the pre-Christ unevangelized. It allows us to affirm that every person who has ever lived—regardless of when or where they were born—will have a genuine opportunity to encounter the living God and respond in faith.

The Descent Tradition as an Answer

The early church had a ready answer to the question of what happened to the Old Testament dead: Christ descended to Hades and preached the gospel to them. As we explored extensively in Chapters 11–13, the descent tradition (the descensus ad inferos) was one of the most widely held beliefs in early Christianity. Peter explicitly states that "the gospel was preached even to those who are dead" (1 Peter 4:6), and the early church interpreted this as referring to Christ's postmortem evangelistic activity among the dead in Hades.43

The Old Testament provides the background for this belief. The texts we have examined in this chapter—God's sovereignty over Sheol, His power to ransom from death, the prophetic hope of resurrection—all set the stage for the New Testament's proclamation that Christ descended to the realm of the dead and triumphed over the powers of death and Hades. As Beilby documents, early Christians appealed to a number of Old Testament texts as evidence for this descent. Peter quotes Psalm 16:10 in Acts 2:27: "You will not abandon me to the realm of the dead, you will not let your holy one see decay." Hosea 13:14 was read as God's promise to ransom from Sheol. Zechariah 9:11 speaks of God freeing prisoners "from the waterless pit."44

The early church was firmly convinced that Christ's descent to Hades had soteriological significance—that it was not merely a passive experience of death but an active mission to bring the gospel to those who had died without hearing it. If the earliest Christians could affirm this about the Old Testament dead, then the principle extends naturally: if Christ preached the gospel to those who died before Him, what reason is there to think He would not extend the same grace to those who die after Him without having heard?

David's Infant Son: A Personal Case Study

One particularly poignant example deserves mention. When David's infant son died (2 Samuel 12:23), David said, "I shall go to him, but he will not return to me." This statement has traditionally been interpreted as David expressing confidence that his son is in heaven and that David will one day be reunited with him there. But as Beilby points out, this reading projects a New Testament understanding of death and the afterlife onto the Old Testament. Given David's Old Testament eschatology, he likely believed his son was in Sheol—the general abode of all the dead. "I will go to him" may simply have been David's way of saying that he, too, would eventually die.45

But this raises an uncomfortable question: Did David's infant son receive salvation? The baby could not exercise conscious faith. He had no understanding of God's promises. If explicit faith is required for salvation, then David's son presents an insoluble problem. The traditional evangelical answer—that infants who die are covered by God's grace despite their inability to believe—is itself an implicit acknowledgment of postmortem salvific activity. It admits that God can extend saving grace to those who never had a chance to consciously respond to the gospel during their earthly lives. Once we admit this principle for infants, the question becomes: Why would God limit this grace to infants alone?

Key Argument: The fate of Old Testament believers—and especially those who lived outside the covenant community of Israel—is one of the most powerful arguments for postmortem opportunity. If salvation requires explicit faith in Christ, the vast majority of the human race who lived before Christ (and the millions who lived during the Old Testament period with no knowledge of the God of Israel) had no chance. Postmortem opportunity provides the only framework in which God's love, fairness, and universal salvific will can be genuinely affirmed for all people who have ever lived.

VI. Counterarguments and Responses

Having laid out the positive evidence, I want to be fair to those who disagree. Thoughtful scholars have raised objections to reading postmortem hope out of the Old Testament, and these objections deserve serious engagement.

Objection 1: "These Old Testament Passages Are Too Obscure to Build Doctrine On"

The first and perhaps most common objection is that the Old Testament passages we have examined are too ambiguous, too underdeveloped, and too open to alternative interpretations to serve as a foundation for the postmortem opportunity thesis. Critics argue that we are reading New Testament ideas back into texts that their original authors never intended to address.

I have three responses. First, the apparent obscurity of these passages is partly the result of approaching them with the presupposition that postmortem opportunity is impossible. When that presupposition is removed, the passages become remarkably clear. Psalm 49:15 says God will ransom from Sheol—why would we assume this means anything other than what it says? Psalm 139:8 says God is present in Sheol—why would we assume His presence there is passive and non-salvific? Isaiah 25:6–8 says God will swallow up death for all peoples—why would we limit this to only those who happened to believe before they died? The obscurity, I suggest, is in the eye of the interpreter, not in the text.46

Second, the apparent obscurity is also partly the result of centuries of interpretation dominated by Augustine's view that death irrevocably seals every person's eternal destiny. Augustine's position became the default reading of the Western church, and subsequent generations read the Old Testament through that lens. But as we documented in Chapters 24 and 25, the early church before Augustine had a much more open posture toward postmortem hope—and many early Christians read these very Old Testament passages as support for it.47

Third, even if one considers these passages ambiguous on their own, they are at minimum consistent with postmortem opportunity and create serious problems for the claim that the Bible clearly teaches that death permanently ends all salvific possibility. The burden of proof lies with those who claim the Bible teaches a final deadline at death. Where does the Old Testament clearly state this? The answer is: it does not. Not once in the entire Hebrew Scriptures does God say, "After death, there is no more opportunity for salvation." The silence is deafening.48

Objection 2: "The Prophetic Universal Salvation Passages Refer Only to the Living"

A more sophisticated objection acknowledges that the prophets do envision universal salvation but argues that this vision applies only to the survivors of the nations—those who are alive at the time of God's eschatological intervention. The dead are not in view. This is essentially the point Parry concedes when he notes that the Old Testament does not envision the salvation of all individuals who have ever lived, because it has no developed concept of life after death.49

This is a fair point, and I accept it as far as it goes. The Old Testament prophets were primarily focused on the living nations of their own time and the future. But this concession actually strengthens the postmortem opportunity thesis rather than weakening it. Here is why: if the Old Testament envisions the universal worship of God but is limited to the living because of its underdeveloped afterlife theology, then the New Testament's expansion of this vision to include the dead (as in Philippians 2:10, "those under the earth") is a natural and expected development. The seed was already planted in the Old Testament; the New Testament simply brings it to full bloom.

Furthermore, the Daniel 12:2 resurrection text does include the dead—and places them before God in a day of judgment. This suggests that even within the Old Testament itself, the trajectory was moving toward including the dead in God's final plans for the world. The prophetic vision of universal salvation and the emerging hope of resurrection were converging toward a single conclusion: that God's saving purposes encompass all people, living and dead alike.

Objection 3: "God's Sovereignty over Sheol Does Not Imply Salvific Activity"

Some may argue that even if God is sovereign over Sheol and present there, this does not necessarily mean He is engaged in saving activity among the dead. Perhaps His presence in Sheol is purely judicial—He is there as judge, not as savior. Perhaps His sovereignty over death is demonstrated not in saving people from Sheol but in having the power to send them there.

This objection fails to reckon with the consistent picture of God's character throughout the Old Testament. The God of the Hebrew Scriptures is not a dispassionate judge who sends people to the underworld and leaves them there. He is the God who "desires that all should be saved" (1 Timothy 2:4, anticipated in the Old Testament by passages like Ezekiel 18:23, 32: "Have I any pleasure in the death of the wicked? declares the Lord GOD. Is it not rather that he should turn from his way and live?"). He is the God who leaves the ninety-nine to find the one lost sheep (Luke 15:4). He is the God whose mercy endures forever—a refrain that echoes through the Psalms over a hundred times.50

If this is who God is—and the entire case of Chapter 2 argues that it is—then His presence in Sheol cannot be merely passive or merely judicial. Where God is, He is active. Where God is, He is saving. To say otherwise is to create a God with a split personality: loving and pursuing on this side of death, cold and indifferent on the other side. The God of the Bible does not change at the boundary of death.

Objection 4: "The Old Testament Says Nothing Explicit About Postmortem Salvation"

This objection is technically true. The Old Testament does not contain a verse that says, "After death, God will offer the unsaved an opportunity to repent and be saved." But this argument from silence cuts both ways. The Old Testament also says nothing explicit about death permanently sealing a person's fate. In fact, as George Hurd observes, the first teaching on post-mortem punishment of any kind in the entire Bible did not appear until Jesus' ministry. Apart from the reference to shame in Daniel 12:2, there is no prior mention of punishment after death in the entire Old Testament. If the traditionalist view of eternal conscious torment were true, then nearly everyone who died before Jesus' ministry received a horrific surprise upon dying, since God never warned them about it.51

The argument from silence, in other words, is not an argument against postmortem opportunity. If anything, the Old Testament's silence on both sides of the issue leaves the question open—and the hints it does provide (God's presence in Sheol, His power to ransom from death, the prophetic vision of universal salvation) all lean in the direction of postmortem hope.

VII. Conclusion

Let me step back and take stock of what we have found. In this chapter, we have examined the Old Testament foundations for the postmortem opportunity thesis. We have not claimed that the Hebrew Scriptures explicitly teach postmortem salvation—they do not. But we have demonstrated that the Old Testament provides essential building blocks upon which such a doctrine can and should be constructed.

We have seen that God is sovereign over Sheol. His power reaches into the realm of the dead. Psalm 16:10 affirms that God will not abandon His people to Sheol. Psalm 49:15 declares that God will ransom the soul from Sheol's grip. Psalm 139:8 proclaims that God's presence extends even to the world of the departed. And Hosea 13:14 taunts death and Sheol, declaring that God will redeem from their power.

We have seen that the prophets envision the defeat of death itself. Isaiah 25:6–8 looks forward to a day when God will swallow up death forever and wipe away tears from all faces. Isaiah 26:19 declares that the dead shall live and their bodies shall rise. Ezekiel 37 portrays God raising a valley of dry bones to life—a picture of resurrection power so absolute that nothing lies beyond its reach. Daniel 12:2 speaks of a final awakening of the dead. And Job 19:25–27 confesses a hope that transcends the grave: "I know that my Redeemer lives."

We have traced the progressive development of afterlife belief in the Old Testament—from shadowy Sheol to resurrection hope—and observed that the trajectory consistently moves in the direction of greater hope, not less. Each stage of revelation opens the door wider to the possibility that God's saving activity is not confined to this life.

We have examined the prophetic visions of universal salvation—Isaiah 2:2–4, Isaiah 19:23–25, Isaiah 45:22–24, Zechariah 14:9, and Isaiah 24:21–22—and found that the Old Testament envisions a day when all nations will worship God, when even Israel's worst enemies will be called "my people," and when every knee will bow before the LORD. These visions are so expansive that they cannot be fulfilled within the ordinary boundaries of earthly life; they demand a scope that extends beyond death.

And we have confronted the challenging question of the Old Testament saints and the unevangelized of the pre-Christian era. If God is truly fair and truly loving, then the millions who lived and died without any knowledge of Him must have an opportunity to encounter Him. The descent tradition—rooted in Old Testament texts and developed in the New Testament and early church—provides exactly this: a declaration that Christ's saving work extends even to those who died before He came.

The Old Testament does not give us a fully formed doctrine of postmortem salvation. But it gives us something just as important: the theological foundations upon which that doctrine is built. It gives us a God who is not limited by death, whose love does not stop at the grave, whose power extends to the very deepest places of human existence, and whose ultimate plan is the reconciliation of all peoples to Himself. These are the roots from which the New Testament's more explicit teaching on postmortem opportunity grows. And these roots run deep.

As we continue our journey through the biblical evidence in the chapters ahead—turning to the scriptural objections (Chapter 18), the meaning of "eternal" in Scripture (Chapter 20), and the nature of hell and divine punishment (Chapters 21–23)—we carry with us the Old Testament's foundational witness: our God is the God of the living and the dead, the Sovereign over Sheol, the Ransomer from death, and the One whose saving purposes will not be thwarted—not by sin, not by time, and not by death itself.

Footnotes

1 The Hebrew nephesh (נֶפֶשׁ) is a broad term that can mean "soul," "self," "life," or "person." In this context, it refers to David's entire self—his inner being that survives death and enters the realm of the dead. See Hans Walter Wolff, Anthropology of the Old Testament, trans. Margaret Kohl (Philadelphia: Fortress, 1974), 10–25.

2 On Sheol as the general abode of the dead in early Israelite thought, see Philip S. Johnston, Shades of Sheol: Death and Afterlife in the Old Testament (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002), 69–84. Harrison provides a helpful summary: "The word Sheol is used in the Hebrew Old Testament, and Hades is consistently used to translate Sheol in the Greek Old Testament (LXX). . . . Sheol was considered: the unseen afterlife in general, often considered as the underworld, a place for both the righteous and unrighteous." William Harrison, Is Salvation Possible After Death?, chap. 12, "What is Hell according to the Bible?," under "D. Usage in the Septuagint (LXX) and its Hebrew cognate Sheol."

3 See Acts 2:24–31. Peter argues that David could not have been speaking of himself (since David did die and was buried), but rather was speaking prophetically of the Messiah, whose soul would not be abandoned to Hades and whose body would not see corruption.

4 Ludwig Koehler and Walter Baumgartner, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament (Leiden: Brill, 2001), s.v. "פָּדָה." The imagery of ransom from a captor is central to this term.

5 For the treatment of Psalm 139:8 in the context of additional New Testament evidence, see Chapter 16, under "Psalm 139:8: God's Presence Extends to Sheol."

6 R. Zachary Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God: An Essay on the Problem of Hell (New York: Oxford University Press, 2019), 383. Manis notes that Sheol/Hades may in fact be a mercy of God—"it postpones an encounter with the divine presence that is constitutive of final judgment."

7 On ga'al (גָּאַל) and the kinsman-redeemer concept, see R. Laird Harris, Gleason L. Archer Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke, eds., Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (Chicago: Moody, 1980), s.v. "גָּאַל." The term implies both the right and the obligation to rescue a family member—a powerfully relational image when applied to God's relationship with humanity.

8 For the full treatment of Paul's appropriation of Hosea 13:14 in 1 Corinthians 15:54–55, see Chapter 15, under "Hosea 13:14 and Its Pauline Citation." Harrison notes: "Verse 54 cites Isaiah 25:8. . . . Verse 55 cites Hosea 13:14." Harrison, Is Salvation Possible After Death?, chap. 12, under "5. 1 Corinthians 15:55."

9 Harrison, Is Salvation Possible After Death?, chap. 12, under "D. Usage in the Septuagint (LXX) and its Hebrew cognate Sheol." See also James K. Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity: A Biblical and Theological Assessment of Salvation After Death (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2021), 180–81, where Beilby notes that early Christians cited Hosea 13:14 as evidence for the descent.

10 John N. Oswalt, The Book of Isaiah, Chapters 1–39, NICOT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986), 457–62.

11 The verb bala (בָּלַע) means "to swallow, engulf, destroy." When applied to death, it means total annihilation of death's power. See HALOT, s.v. "בָּלַע."

12 Harrison, Is Salvation Possible After Death?, chap. 12, under "5. 1 Corinthians 15:55." Harrison writes: "How could it be said that God has the victory over death and Hell if billions will remain there forever?"

13 Oswalt, Isaiah 1–39, 484–86. The imagery of the earth "giving birth" (tappil, from naphal) to the dead is extraordinary—it reverses the process of death by which the earth "swallowed" the dead into its depths.

14 On the "Isaiah Apocalypse" (chapters 24–27) and its eschatological orientation, see J. Todd Hibbard, Intertextuality in Isaiah 24–27: The Reuse and Evocation of Earlier Texts and Traditions (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006), 1–15.

15 Daniel I. Block, The Book of Ezekiel, Chapters 25–48, NICOT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), 370–92.

16 Robin Parry [as Gregory MacDonald], The Evangelical Universalist, 2nd ed. (Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2012), chap. 3, "Israel, God, and the Nations in the Old Testament." Parry observes: "The Old Testament prophets portrayed Israel's exile in terms of a metaphorical death and resurrection (esp. Ezekiel 37; Hos 6:2; Isa 26:29)."

17 John J. Collins, Daniel: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel, Hermeneia (Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993), 391–98.

18 On the debate over rabbim as "many" or "all," see Collins, Daniel, 392–93. See also the discussion in Chapter 15 of this book on Paul's use of hoi polloi in Romans 5:15–19.

19 For the full treatment of olam and its relationship to aiōnios, see Chapter 20, "Aiōn, Aiōnios, and Olam—The Meaning of 'Eternal' in Scripture." See also David Burnfield, Patristic Universalism: An Alternative to the Traditional View of Divine Judgment, 2nd ed. (2016), chap. 7, "Answering Objections," under "Objection 1: Aionios Always Means 'Eternal.'"

20 George Hurd, The Triumph of Mercy: The Reconciliation of All through Jesus Christ (2017), chap. 6, "The Bible and Hell," under "The Lack of Emphasis on Post-mortem Punishment in the Scriptures." Hurd observes: "The first teaching on 'hell' in the Bible was not presented until Jesus taught concerning Gehenna in the gospels. Apart from the reference to shame and self-contempt of the unjust that will last for olam (a period of undefined duration) in Daniel, there is no prior mention of punishment after death in the entire Old Testament."

21 Robert L. Alden, Job, NAC (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1993), 206–10. The debate over whether min-besari (מִן־בְּשָׂרִי) means "from my flesh" (i.e., in a disembodied state looking back at the flesh I once had) or "in my flesh" (i.e., with a resurrected body) is well known. Either reading supports the claim that Job expects a post-mortem encounter with God.

22 Johnston, Shades of Sheol, 69–84. See also Harrison, Is Salvation Possible After Death?, chap. 12, under "D. Usage in the Septuagint (LXX) and its Hebrew cognate Sheol": "Genesis shows Hades/Sheol as the afterlife (37:35, 42:38, 44:29, 44:31). Numbers 16:30, 33 shows that it is the underworld (under the Earth) that is descended into."

23 Harrison, Is Salvation Possible After Death?, chap. 12, under "D. Usage in the Septuagint (LXX) and its Hebrew cognate Sheol."

24 Harrison, Is Salvation Possible After Death?, chap. 12, under "D. Usage in the Septuagint (LXX) and its Hebrew cognate Sheol." Harrison notes: "The Bible refers to how one goes down to Hades/Sheol and goes back up, and this is connected to death and life (1 Samuel 2:6, 2 Samuel 22:6, 1 Kings 2:6, 9)."

25 On the "under the sun" perspective of Ecclesiastes, see Tremper Longman III, The Book of Ecclesiastes, NICOT (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998), 38–44. The author of Ecclesiastes is describing the world as it appears from a purely earthly vantage point, not making absolute theological claims about the eternal condition of the dead.

26 On progressive revelation and the development of afterlife theology, see N. T. Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God (Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003), 85–128. Wright documents the gradual emergence of resurrection hope in Second Temple Judaism, building on the foundations laid in the Old Testament.

27 Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity, 135. Beilby acknowledges the "underdeveloped nature of personal eschatology in the Old Testament" while noting that Old Testament texts like Hosea 13:14 and Isaiah 24:21–22 provide suggestive echoes of postmortem opportunity.

28 Oswalt, Isaiah 1–39, 115–22. See also Gary V. Smith, Isaiah 1–39, NAC (Nashville: B&H, 2007), 129–34.

29 Oswalt, Isaiah 1–39, 381–86. The application of covenant titles ("my people," "the work of my hands") to Israel's traditional enemies is without parallel in the Old Testament.

30 Parry, The Evangelical Universalist, chap. 3, "Israel, God, and the Nations in the Old Testament." Parry writes of a pattern in Isaiah where "the Lord strikes them and then heals them. That is the pattern for the nations as it was with Israel."

31 Harrison, Is Salvation Possible After Death?, chap. 10, "III. Isaiah 45:22–25." Harrison observes: "The passage starts with an exhortation for all to come to God, and that they will be saved if they come."

32 Parry, The Evangelical Universalist, chap. 3. Parry argues that "the power of Yahweh's word is pervasive" in Second Isaiah, noting that "this word lasts forever (40:8) and will not return to God without accomplishing what he sent it for (55:10–11), so it is not possible that one should envisage that the divine oath to ensure universal worship will remain unrealized."

33 Harrison, Is Salvation Possible After Death?, chap. 10, "III. Isaiah 45:22–25."

34 Parry, The Evangelical Universalist, chap. 3. Parry concedes: "The reason that I think the Old Testament does not envisage the salvation of all individuals who have ever existed and is thus not universalist in the strong sense of the word is that it has no conception of life after death, at least until the very end of the Old Testament period (Dan 12:2)."

35 Thomas Edward McComiskey, ed., The Minor Prophets: An Exegetical and Expository Commentary, vol. 3 (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1998), 1229–35.

36 Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity, 135. Beilby notes that Isaiah 24:21–22 "refers to a 'visitation' of those who are dead," citing the KJV rendering of paqad as "visited."

37 Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity, 135.

38 Charles C. Ryrie, Dispensationalism Today (Chicago: Moody, 1965), 123. Cited in Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity, 257.

39 Stephen Jonathan, Grace beyond the Grave: Is Salvation Possible in the Afterlife? A Biblical, Theological, and Pastoral Evaluation (Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014), chap. 7, "Inclusivism." Jonathan documents the "holy pagans" tradition, including Job, Melchizedek, Lot, Abimelech, Jethro, Rahab, Ruth, and the Queen of Sheba.

40 Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity, 256–57. Beilby writes: "Hebrews 11 teaches that it was by faith that Abraham was saved, but it is difficult in the extreme to explain how Abraham's faith included belief in Jesus Christ."

41 Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity, 246–62. Beilby's treatment of the unevangelized spans an entire chapter and documents the ways in which restrictivism, inclusivism, and postmortem opportunity each attempt to address the problem.

42 Jonathan, Grace beyond the Grave, chap. 7, "Inclusivism." Jonathan provides an extensive list of Christian thinkers who have affirmed that saving grace can operate beyond the boundaries of explicit gospel proclamation, from Justin Martyr's logos theology to John Wesley's affirmation of the possibility of salvation for the unevangelized.

43 See Chapters 11–13 for the full treatment of 1 Peter 3:18–4:6 and the descent tradition. See also Burnfield, Patristic Universalism, chap. 5, "Mercy Beyond the Grave," under "Christ's Descent into Hell."

44 Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity, 180–81. Beilby notes that early Christians cited Psalm 16:10 (via Acts 2:27), Hosea 13:14, Zechariah 9:11, Matthew 12:40, and Romans 10:7 as evidence for Christ's descent to the realm of the dead.

45 Beilby, Postmortem Opportunity, 7. Beilby argues that David's statement "I will go to him" was "plausibly simply a statement that David, like his son, would someday die," given that David's views would have reflected the Old Testament understanding of Sheol as the general abode of all the dead.

46 This argument is developed more fully in Chapter 12, where we argue that the "obscurity" of 1 Peter 3:18–4:6 is largely the product of reading the text through the lens of a predetermined theological conclusion rather than letting the text speak on its own terms. The same principle applies to the Old Testament passages discussed in this chapter.

47 See Chapters 24 and 25 for the detailed historical survey of postmortem salvation in the early church and the patristic evidence. See also Burnfield, Patristic Universalism, chap. 9, "Historical Support of the Early Church."

48 This silence is all the more striking when we consider that the Old Testament contains explicit statements about God's desire to save all people (Ezekiel 18:23, 32; 33:11), His universal mercy (Psalm 136, repeated 26 times), and His plan to draw all nations to Himself (Isaiah 45:22–24; Zechariah 14:9). The absence of any counterbalancing statement that death ends all salvific opportunity is significant.

49 Parry, The Evangelical Universalist, chap. 3.

50 Psalm 136 repeats the refrain "His steadfast love endures forever" (ki le'olam chasdo) twenty-six times. The same refrain appears in Psalm 100:5, 106:1, 107:1, 118:1–4, and numerous other places. See also Burnfield, Patristic Universalism, chap. 6, "Hell—Its Purpose and Its Duration," under "God's Anger Being but for a Moment."

51 Hurd, The Triumph of Mercy, chap. 6, "The Bible and Hell," under "The Lack of Emphasis on Post-mortem Punishment in the Scriptures."

Bibliography

Alden, Robert L. Job. New American Commentary. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1993.

Beilby, James K. Postmortem Opportunity: A Biblical and Theological Assessment of Salvation After Death. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2021.

Block, Daniel I. The Book of Ezekiel, Chapters 25–48. New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.

Burnfield, David. Patristic Universalism: An Alternative to the Traditional View of Divine Judgment. 2nd ed. 2016.

Collins, John J. Daniel: A Commentary on the Book of Daniel. Hermeneia. Minneapolis: Fortress, 1993.

Harris, R. Laird, Gleason L. Archer Jr., and Bruce K. Waltke, eds. Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament. Chicago: Moody, 1980.

Harrison, William. Is Salvation Possible After Death?

Hibbard, J. Todd. Intertextuality in Isaiah 24–27: The Reuse and Evocation of Earlier Texts and Traditions. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2006.

Hurd, George. The Triumph of Mercy: The Reconciliation of All through Jesus Christ. 2017.

Johnston, Philip S. Shades of Sheol: Death and Afterlife in the Old Testament. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 2002.

Jonathan, Stephen. Grace beyond the Grave: Is Salvation Possible in the Afterlife? A Biblical, Theological, and Pastoral Evaluation. Eugene, OR: Wipf & Stock, 2014.

Koehler, Ludwig, and Walter Baumgartner. The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament. Leiden: Brill, 2001.

Longman, Tremper, III. The Book of Ecclesiastes. New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998.

Manis, R. Zachary. Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God: An Essay on the Problem of Hell. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.

McComiskey, Thomas Edward, ed. The Minor Prophets: An Exegetical and Expository Commentary. Vol. 3. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 1998.

Oswalt, John N. The Book of Isaiah, Chapters 1–39. New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1986.

Parry, Robin [as Gregory MacDonald]. The Evangelical Universalist. 2nd ed. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2012.

Ryrie, Charles C. Dispensationalism Today. Chicago: Moody, 1965.

Smith, Gary V. Isaiah 1–39. New American Commentary. Nashville: B&H, 2007.

Talbott, Thomas. The Inescapable Love of God. 2nd ed. Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2014.

Wolff, Hans Walter. Anthropology of the Old Testament. Translated by Margaret Kohl. Philadelphia: Fortress, 1974.

Wright, N. T. The Resurrection of the Son of God. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003.

Previous Chapter | Table of Contents | Next Chapter