Chapter 23
Picture a courtroom. A stern judge sits behind a tall bench. The accused stands trembling in front of him. The judge reads the charges. The gavel falls. Guilty. The punishment is announced. The bailiff leads the condemned away. That is how most of us picture the final judgment. God is the judge. We are the accused. And the verdict has already been decided before we even walk through the door.
I used to picture it exactly that way. And honestly, it terrified me. Not because I doubted that God was fair—but because I was pretty sure I would not measure up. I imagined God flipping through a long list of every bad thing I had ever done, every unkind thought, every selfish moment. And I imagined Him shaking His head and reaching for the gavel.
But what if that picture is wrong? What if the final judgment is not a courtroom scene at all?
In this chapter, we are going to walk through the major judgment passages in the Bible—Revelation 20:11–15, Daniel 7:9–10, Matthew 25:31–46, John 5:28–29, Romans 2:5–16, 2 Corinthians 5:10, and Romans 14:10–12. These are the passages that people point to when they talk about the last judgment, the great white throne, the separation of the sheep and the goats. They are some of the most important texts in all of Scripture on the subject of hell and eternity.
And here is what I want you to watch for as we work through them: in passage after passage, the judgment is described not as a punishment handed down from above, but as a revealing. The books are opened. Secrets are exposed. Truth is brought into the light. The consistent picture is not of an angry judge pronouncing a sentence. It is of a blazing light that shows everything for what it really is.
Kalomiros puts it beautifully: “God is Truth and Light. God’s judgment is nothing else than our coming into contact with truth and light.”1 That is the thread that ties every judgment passage together. And on the divine presence model, it makes perfect sense. The final judgment is the moment when God’s presence becomes fully unveiled—when the light of Christ shines into every corner of every heart—and what has been hidden is hidden no more. Manis calls this the “judgment of transparency.”2
That is what we are going to see in passage after passage. The judgment is real. It is serious. It is final. But it is not what most Western Christians have been taught to expect. It is not a courtroom. It is a mirror—a mirror made of fire and light.
Before we begin, a quick note. Several of the passages we will examine in this chapter overlap with passages we treated in Chapter 22 (the fire passages) and Chapter 21 (Hades and Gehenna). Where a passage was treated in full detail in an earlier chapter, I will not repeat that exegesis here. Instead, I will focus on what each passage teaches us specifically about the judgment—the moment when the books are opened, the secrets are revealed, and every person stands transparent before the God who is light. For the full treatment of fire imagery, see Chapter 22. For the full treatment of the Hades/Gehenna distinction, see Chapter 21.
“Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. The earth and the heavens fled from his presence, and there was no place for them. And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Another book was opened, which is the book of life. The dead were judged according to what they had done as recorded in the books. The sea gave up the dead that were in it, and death and Hades gave up the dead that were in them, and each person was judged according to what they had done. Then death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. The lake of fire is the second death. Anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire.” (Revelation 20:11–15)
This is probably the most famous judgment passage in the entire Bible. The great white throne. The dead standing before God. The books opened. The lake of fire. It is a scene that has haunted the Christian imagination for two thousand years. And for most people in the Western church, the picture seems clear: God is the judge, the books are the evidence, and the lake of fire is the punishment for those who fail the test.
But slow down. Look at the details more carefully.
The first thing to notice is the throne itself. It is “great” and “white.” In the book of Revelation, whiteness is always connected to purity, holiness, and the glory of God.3 The throne radiates such overwhelming power that “the earth and the heavens fled from his presence.” This is not a calm, quiet courtroom. This is the full, unveiled, unfiltered presence of the living God. Everything that is not rooted in reality simply cannot stand before it. Creation itself trembles and gives way.
The second thing to notice—and this is the key to the whole passage—is what happens next. “Books were opened.” What are these books? The traditional ECT reading assumes they are God’s record books—divine ledgers where every sin has been carefully written down so that God can read off the charges. But there is an older and, I believe, better reading. The “books” are the human hearts themselves.
Kalomiros explains: “The ‘books’ will be opened. What are these ‘books’? They are our hearts. Our hearts will be opened by the penetrating light of God, and what is in these hearts will be revealed.”4 Manis agrees, drawing on a long tradition of interpretation. The books that are opened at the great white throne are the records of human consciences—the full, unedited story of who each person truly is, laid bare before the light of God.5
Think about that for a moment. The judgment is not God flipping through His files. The judgment is God opening our files—the ones we have been hiding, even from ourselves. It is the moment when every secret is brought into the light. Every self-deception is stripped away. Every hidden motive is exposed. The truth about each person is finally, fully, inescapably known.
Key Argument: On the divine presence model, the “books” opened at the great white throne are the human hearts themselves—the records of individual consciences, “read” like open books when exposed to the penetrating light of Christ’s unveiled presence. The judgment is not a verdict imposed from outside. It is a revelation of what is already true on the inside.
This reading fits the Greek word apokalupsis (revelation), which literally means “an unveiling” or “an uncovering.”6 The central event of the book of Revelation—the Apocalypse itself—is a double unveiling: the unveiling of Christ in glory, and the unveiling of the truth about every human being. As Manis puts it, the final judgment is “a public declaration of the truth about each person, an event in which all that was previously hidden is made manifest.”7
Notice also what is “thrown into the lake of fire.” Death and Hades are thrown in. These are not persons. They are the old order of things—the intermediate state, the temporary holding place for the dead. As we discussed in Chapter 21, Hades is the waiting room. Now the waiting room itself is destroyed. The intermediate state is over. The final state has arrived.8 And in the final state, as we saw in Chapter 22, the “lake of fire” is not a separate torture chamber. It is the unmitigated presence of the living God—the same reality experienced as life by the redeemed and as consuming fire by the unrepentant.9
The Danish philosopher Søren Kierkegaard captures this beautifully in The Sickness unto Death. He imagines the transparency that every person will experience before God—a transparency like living in a glass house where nothing can be hidden. He writes that each person’s record of conscience is “written with invisible ink and therefore first becomes clearly legible only when it is held up to the light in eternity.”10 On the divine presence model, that “light of eternity” is the radiant presence of the glorified Christ. When we stand before the great white throne, it is Christ’s light—not an earthly judge’s gavel—that reveals the truth.
Now, how does the traditional ECT view read this passage? Typically, it reads the great white throne as a standard courtroom trial. God is the judge. He looks at the evidence. He pronounces the verdict. And the punishment is eternal conscious torment in the lake of fire. The books are God’s records. The sentence is His decision.
The divine presence reading is different—and, I believe, better. On this reading, the judgment is not something God does to the wicked. It is something that happens to the wicked when they are exposed to the full blaze of divine truth. The books are not God’s records. They are our hearts. The sentence is not an external punishment. It is the natural result of a sinful heart encountering the holiness of God with nowhere left to hide. As Manis explains, “the final judgment isn’t a matter of God’s making something true by declaring it; it’s a revelation of what’s already true.”11
This is a profoundly important distinction. On the ECT reading, God decides who goes to hell and sends them there. On the divine presence reading, God reveals the truth, and the condition of the heart determines how that truth is experienced. The difference is not in the fire. The difference is in the heart.
“As I looked, thrones were set in place, and the Ancient of Days took his seat. His clothing was as white as snow; the hair of his head was white like wool. His throne was flaming with fire, and its wheels were all ablaze. A river of fire was flowing, coming out from before him. Thousands upon thousands attended him; ten thousand times ten thousand stood before him. The court was seated, and the books were opened.” (Daniel 7:9–10)
Daniel’s vision is one of the oldest and most powerful depictions of the final judgment in all of Scripture. And it gives us a detail that is easy to miss but absolutely crucial: the fire is flowing from God. It is “coming out from before him.”
That is not a small detail. If the fire of judgment is a separate torture chamber that God sends people to—as the ECT view assumes—then it should have nothing to do with God’s throne. But Daniel sees the fire coming from the throne. The fire is not separate from God. The fire is God’s presence, streaming out in radiant, overwhelming glory.
The Hebrew word translated “Ancient of Days” is attiq yomin, meaning literally “one advanced in days”—the Eternal One, the God who has existed before all time.12 His clothing is white as snow. His hair is white like wool. His throne is ablaze. And from that throne comes a river of fire. This is not a judge sitting calmly at a bench. This is the unveiled glory of the living God, and it is pouring out over all creation like a river.
Kalomiros sees in this passage the key to understanding every other judgment text in the Bible. The river of fire from the throne of God is not an instrument of torture. It is the river of God’s love. Kalomiros writes: “This river of fire is the river which ‘came out from Eden to water the paradise’ of old. It is the river of the grace of God which irrigated God’s saints from the beginning. In a word, it is the out-pouring of God’s love for His creatures.”13
Think about that connection. In Genesis 2:10, a river flows out of Eden to water the garden—the place of life, beauty, and communion with God. In Daniel 7:10, a river of fire flows out from God’s throne. In Revelation 22:1, a river of the water of life flows from the throne of the Lamb. All three rivers come from the same source: the presence of God.14
On the divine presence model, these rivers are all the same reality. The river of Eden, the river of fire, and the river of the water of life are all descriptions of the outpouring of God’s presence. The difference is not in the river. The difference is in how it is experienced. For those who love God, the river is life, refreshment, healing. For those who hate God, the same river is fire, torment, judgment.15
And notice: Daniel also says “the books were opened.” The same phrase we saw in Revelation 20. The opening of the books is tied directly to the river of fire flowing from God’s throne. In the divine presence model, this makes perfect sense. When God’s presence is fully unveiled, His light penetrates every heart, and the truth about every person is laid bare. The fire reveals. The books open. The judgment is the exposure.
The traditional ECT reading tends to treat Daniel’s river of fire as a symbol of God’s wrath—a destructive force that God sends against His enemies. But that reading ignores the fact that the fire comes from God’s own throne. It is not a weapon God picks up. It is an energy that flows out of His very being. As Kalomiros says, “Love is fire. Anyone who loves knows this. God is Love, so God is Fire.”16
The Orthodox tradition captures this insight in the icons of the Last Judgment. In these icons, Christ is seated on the throne, with the righteous on His right and the wicked on His left. And flowing from the throne, right down the middle, is a river of fire. The same river reaches both groups. The righteous experience it as glory. The wicked experience it as torment. The fire does not change. The hearts do.17
“When the Son of Man comes in his glory, and all the angels with him, he will sit on his glorious throne. All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.” (Matthew 25:31–32)
“Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world.’” (Matthew 25:34)
“Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels.’” (Matthew 25:41)
“Then they will go away to eternal punishment, but the righteous to eternal life.” (Matthew 25:46)
If you have spent any time at all in discussions about hell, you have heard about the sheep and the goats. This passage is one of the most commonly cited texts in the entire debate. And it looks, at first glance, like an open-and-shut case for the traditional view. The sheep go to eternal life. The goats go to eternal punishment. Case closed.
But here is the thing. This passage actually supports the divine presence model better than the ECT reading. Let me show you why.
First, notice how the scene begins. “When the Son of Man comes in his glory.” The judgment is triggered by the revealing of Christ in glory—the parousia, the appearing, the moment when divine hiddenness ends and every eye sees Him as He is. The Greek word for “glory” here is doxa, which refers to the radiant, shining splendor of God’s being.18 The Son of Man does not arrive quietly. He arrives blazing with divine glory, surrounded by angels, seated on a throne of fire and light. This is the same reality Daniel saw. This is the same reality John describes in Revelation.
Second, notice what the judgment is based on. The sheep are commended not because they recited the right creed or belonged to the right church. They are commended because they fed the hungry, clothed the naked, visited the sick and imprisoned. In other words, they lived lives shaped by love.19 The goats are condemned not because they held the wrong theology. They are condemned because they did not love. They walked right past human suffering and did nothing.
Baker points out that this is crucial. The parable says nothing about accepting a particular doctrine. It says nothing about walking an aisle or praying a prayer. The criterion for judgment is love—or the lack of it.20 That fits the divine presence model perfectly. The fire of God is love. Those who have cultivated love in their hearts can receive that fire as warmth and welcome. Those who have refused to love find the same fire unbearable. The sheep have become “fire themselves,” as Kalomiros would say. The goats have not.21
Third, notice the language of “eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels” (v. 41). The fire was not prepared for human beings at all. It was prepared for the devil and his angels. Humans end up there only because they have aligned themselves with the forces of darkness rather than with the God who is light.22 And as we saw in Chapter 22, the word translated “eternal” is the Greek word aionios, which can mean “pertaining to an age” or “age-long,” not necessarily “never-ending.” The exact duration of this “punishment” is not as clear-cut as the English translation makes it sound.23
Fourth, the word translated “punishment” in verse 46 is the Greek word kolasis. This is a deeply important word. In classical Greek, kolasis specifically referred to corrective punishment—punishment designed to improve the person being punished. It is different from the Greek word timoria, which referred to retributive punishment—punishment designed simply to make someone pay for what they did.24 Aristotle himself distinguished between the two: kolasis is for the sake of the one who suffers it, while timoria is for the satisfaction of the one who inflicts it.25 Jesus chose kolasis. Not timoria. That is a deliberate and significant choice. The punishment Jesus describes has a corrective, refining quality to it—not the cold, retributive quality that ECT requires.
Insight: Jesus used the Greek word kolasis (corrective punishment) in Matthew 25:46, not timoria (retributive punishment). This word choice suggests that the “eternal punishment” Jesus describes is aimed at correction and purification—not at making people suffer for suffering’s sake. This fits the divine presence model, where God’s fire always aims at restoration.
Now, how does the divine presence model read this parable as a whole? Baker offers a compelling picture. The sheep—those who have cultivated love—stand before the blazing glory of Christ and experience it as welcome, warmth, homecoming. They are ushered into the kingdom because their hearts are already attuned to love. They are “fire themselves.” The goats—those who have refused to love—stand before the same blazing glory and experience it as unbearable exposure. Their lack of love is laid bare. Their selfishness is revealed. The same fire that welcomes the sheep scorches the goats—not because God changes, but because their hearts are unprepared for the encounter.26
The ECT reading makes the separation depend on God’s decision—God sends the sheep to heaven and the goats to hell. The divine presence reading makes the separation depend on the condition of the heart—the sheep and the goats respond differently to the same overwhelming reality. As Kalomiros says, “God’s judgment is the revelation of the reality which is in man.”27
There is one more thing worth noticing. The passage says the goats are told to “depart from me.” Many people read this as proof that hell is separation from God’s presence. But think about it more carefully. The goats are standing right in front of the Son of Man. They are already in His presence. They are already exposed to His glory. The command to “depart” is not a command to go to a place where God is absent. As we saw in Chapter 16, God is omnipresent—there is nowhere in the universe where God is not. The goats depart from communion with Christ, but they do not depart from His presence. They go into the “eternal fire”—which, as we have seen, is the fire of God’s own being, the same river that flows from the throne in Daniel 7.
Manis makes this point with great clarity. The “separation” of the sheep and the goats is not a spatial separation—one group in God’s presence, the other removed from it. It is a relational separation. The sheep are in communion with God. The goats are in His presence but cut off from communion with Him. They experience His love not as warmth but as unbearable exposure. They are, as Manis puts it, “in the unmitigated presence of God” but unable to experience that presence as anything other than torment.52
“Do not be amazed at this, for a time is coming when all who are in their graves will hear his voice and come out—those who have done what is good will rise to live, and those who have done what is evil will rise to be condemned.” (John 5:28–29)
This short passage gives us the big picture in a single breath. Everyone will be raised. Everyone will hear the voice of the Son of Man. And the outcome will depend on what each person has done—those who have done good will rise to life, and those who have done evil will rise to condemnation.
But the passage takes on a richer meaning when we read it in the context of what Jesus says just a few verses earlier and later in the same chapter. In John 5:22, Jesus says, “The Father judges no one, but has entrusted all judgment to the Son.” In John 5:27, He adds, “And he has given him authority to judge because he is the Son of Man.” So Jesus is the judge. That much is clear.
But then, in John 5:30, Jesus says something surprising: “By myself I can do nothing; I judge only as I hear, and my judgment is just, for I seek not to please myself but him who sent me.” And in John 5:45: “But do not think I will accuse you before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, on whom your hopes are set.”
Wait. Jesus is the judge, but He does not accuse? He judges, but only “as He hears”? He has authority to condemn, but He says, “I did not come to judge the world, but to save the world” (John 12:47)? These statements seem contradictory on the surface. But on the divine presence model, they fit together perfectly.28
Manis explains: Christ’s judgment is not like an earthly judge’s verdict. An earthly judge makes a decision and declares it. Christ’s judgment is not a decision about guilt or innocence. It is a revealing of what is already true. “I judge only as I hear” means “I simply declare what is already the case.” The judgment is not something Christ makes true by saying it. It is something that is true, and His presence reveals it.29
And who is the accuser? Not Christ. “Your accuser is Moses.” For the Jews, the accuser is the law they claimed to follow but failed to keep. For Gentiles, as Paul writes in Romans 2:15, the accuser is “the law written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness.”30 The accuser is not God. The accuser is the person’s own conscience—the internal record of truth that can no longer be hidden when the light of Christ shines upon it.
So when John 5:29 says those who have done evil will “rise to be condemned,” the divine presence model reads this not as God pronouncing a sentence, but as the resurrection into the full presence of Christ producing an experience of condemnation for those whose hearts are stained by evil. The condemnation is real. But it comes from the collision between truth and self-deception, between light and darkness—not from an external decree imposed by a hostile judge.
Think of it this way. Imagine a person who has spent their whole life in a dark room. They have told themselves the room is clean and beautiful. They have convinced themselves that everything is fine. Now, suddenly, someone turns on a blinding light. Every stain, every cobweb, every pile of trash is exposed. The light did not create the mess. It revealed it. And the experience of seeing it is devastating. That is the judgment of transparency.31
Manis develops this even further. He points out that throughout His ministry, Jesus’s presence produced exactly this kind of effect. When Jesus encountered the “sinners”—the tax collectors, the prostitutes, the outcasts—many of them responded with repentance and even radical conversion. But when Jesus encountered the scribes and Pharisees, those who considered themselves righteous, His presence produced the opposite reaction: offense, rage, and eventually murderous hatred. The difference was not in Jesus. The difference was in the heart of the person standing before Him.53
This is a preview of the final judgment. The “sinners” who knew they were sinners could acknowledge the truth about themselves. When confronted with the light, they stepped into it. The Pharisees, who had built elaborate systems of self-deception to convince themselves of their own righteousness, found the light intolerable. They could not bear to have their pretenses exposed. So they tried to destroy the light instead.54
At the final judgment, as John 5:28–29 tells us, everyone will hear Christ’s voice and come out of their graves. Everyone will stand in the blazing presence of the glorified Christ. And in that moment, the same dynamic that played out in Galilee and Jerusalem will play out on a cosmic scale. Those who have allowed God’s Spirit to soften their hearts during this life will experience the unveiling as liberation, healing, and joy. Those who have hardened their hearts will experience it as devastating exposure and torment. The voice of the Son of Man raises all the dead. But the condition of the heart determines what the resurrection means for each person.
“But because of your stubbornness and your unrepentant heart, you are storing up wrath against yourself for the day of God’s wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed. God ‘will repay each person according to what they have done.’ To those who by persistence in doing good seek glory, honor and immortality, he will give eternal life. But for those who are self-seeking and who reject the truth and follow evil, there will be wrath and anger. There will be trouble and distress for every human being who does evil: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile; but glory, honor and peace for everyone who does good: first for the Jew, then for the Gentile. For God does not show favoritism.” (Romans 2:5–11)
“All who sin apart from the law will also perish apart from the law, and all who sin under the law will be judged by the law. For it is not those who hear the law who are righteous in God’s sight, but it is those who obey the law who will be declared righteous. Indeed, when Gentiles, who do not have the law, do by nature things required by the law, they are a law for themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that the requirements of the law are written on their hearts, their consciences also bearing witness, and their thoughts sometimes accusing them and at other times even defending them. This will take place on the day when God judges people’s secrets through Jesus Christ, as my gospel declares.” (Romans 2:12–16)
This passage is dense, but the key idea is concentrated in one explosive phrase at the very end: “God judges people’s secrets through Jesus Christ.” Not God judges people’s sins. Not God judges people’s crimes. God judges people’s secrets. The Greek word is krupta, meaning “hidden things.”32 The final judgment is about uncovering what has been hidden. It is, once again, a judgment of transparency.
And notice how the judgment works. Paul does not say that God will apply a one-size-fits-all standard. He says that each person will be judged according to the light they received. Jews who had the law of Moses will be judged by that law. Gentiles who never heard of Moses but who have the law “written on their hearts” will be judged by their own conscience.33 The standard is internal, not external. The judge looks at the heart, not just the behavior.
This is the passage that Manis points to as one of the clearest biblical texts supporting the judgment of transparency. On the day of judgment, each person’s conscience will “bear witness”—the internal record of right and wrong that each person carries will be opened and exposed to the light of Christ. “Their conflicting thoughts”—the arguments people have had with themselves about whether what they did was right or wrong—will either “accuse” or “defend” them.34
Now notice verse 5 again. People are “storing up wrath against yourself.” That is a striking phrase. The wrath is not stored up by God in some cosmic warehouse. It is stored up by the sinner, against themselves. Every act of stubbornness, every refusal to repent, every choice to suppress the truth—all of it is adding to the weight of what will be revealed on the day of judgment. The sinner is building their own case. They are writing their own book. And on the day of judgment, that book will be opened.35
The word translated “revealed” in verse 5 is the Greek apokalupsis—the same word that gives us the title of the book of Revelation. Paul is saying that the day of judgment is a day of apocalypse, a day of unveiling. God’s righteous judgment will be apokalupsis—uncovered, laid bare, brought into the light.36
Note: The consistent use of “unveiling” language throughout the New Testament judgment passages—apokalupsis in Romans 2:5, “books opened” in Revelation 20:12, “secrets judged” in Romans 2:16, “hidden things brought to light” in 1 Corinthians 4:5—points to a picture of judgment as exposure and revelation, not as an externally imposed legal verdict.
The ECT reading tends to focus on the word “wrath” in this passage and conclude that God is angry and will punish the wicked by sending them to a place of eternal torture. But the divine presence model offers a different reading. The “wrath” of God is not an emotion of rage. It is the natural effect of God’s holy love encountering a heart that has hardened itself against that love. God’s wrath is His love, experienced as fire by those who resist it. And the “trouble and distress” Paul describes in verse 9 is not inflicted from outside. It is the natural consequence of having your deepest secrets—the ones you spent your whole life hiding—suddenly and inescapably exposed to the light of truth.37
Fr. Thomas Hopko summarizes it well: “God does not punish man by some material fire or physical torment. God simply reveals Himself in the risen Lord Jesus in such a glorious way that no man can fail to behold His glory. It is the presence of God’s splendid glory and love that is the scourge of those who reject its radiant power and light.”38
“For we must all appear before the judgment seat of Christ, so that each of us may receive what is due us for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad.” (2 Corinthians 5:10)
Here Paul makes it clear that the judgment includes everyone—not just unbelievers. “We must all appear.” This is a universal summons. No one is exempt. Believers and unbelievers alike will stand before the judgment seat of Christ.
The Greek word for “judgment seat” is bema. In the Roman world, the bema was the raised platform where a magistrate sat to hear cases and render decisions. Paul uses this word to describe the place where Christ will evaluate the lives of all people.39 But notice the word “appear.” The Greek word phaneroo means “to make visible, to reveal, to lay bare.”40 Paul is not saying that we will merely show up at the judgment seat. He is saying that we will be made manifest—that who we really are will be exposed for all to see.
This connects directly to what Paul wrote just a few verses earlier: “So we make it our goal to please him, whether we are at home in the body or away from it” (2 Corinthians 5:9). And just a few verses later: “Since, then, we know what it is to fear the Lord, we try to persuade others. What we are is plain to God, and I hope it is also plain to your conscience” (2 Corinthians 5:11). Paul links the judgment seat directly to the theme of being “plain”—transparent, fully known, exposed.
Baker draws our attention to a parallel passage, 1 Corinthians 3:12–15, where Paul describes each person’s work being tested by fire: “Their work will be shown for what it is, because the Day will bring it to light. It will be revealed with fire, and the fire will test the quality of each person’s work.” The fire does not destroy the person. It tests the work. What survives the fire is real. What burns away was never genuine. Baker points out that the Greek word for “saved” in 1 Corinthians 3:15 also means “healed.” The fire purifies and heals.41
On the divine presence model, the judgment seat of Christ is not a place where Christ decides our fate by consulting a record. It is the moment when each person is fully exposed to the presence of Christ—when everything about us is “made manifest.” For believers, this is the completion of purification. The remaining dross is burned away, and they stand clean before God. For unbelievers, this is the moment of devastating exposure. Everything they hid, everything they denied, everything they suppressed is suddenly, inescapably visible.
Both groups stand before the same Christ. Both are exposed to the same fire. The difference is in the heart.
There is something else worth noting in this passage. Paul says we will receive what is due us “for the things done while in the body, whether good or bad.” This is not a once-and-for-all verdict based on a single moment of faith or unfaith. It is an evaluation of a whole life—of the kind of person each one has become through the accumulated choices of a lifetime. The judgment seat of Christ does not just look at what you believed. It looks at what you did with what you believed. It examines the fruit, not just the roots.
On the divine presence model, this makes sense in a way it does not on the ECT view. If the judgment were simply about sorting people into “saved” and “unsaved” categories based on whether they accepted Christ, then the evaluation of “things done in the body” would be irrelevant for believers. But Paul says we must all appear. Believers included. Everyone will be exposed. Everyone will be made transparent. For believers, this exposure completes their purification. For unbelievers, it begins—or consummates—their judgment. But the mechanism is the same: the presence of Christ, who is truth and light, making everything visible.
The Catechism of the Catholic Church, drawing on a tradition that stretches back to the Church Fathers, captures this well: “In the presence of Christ, who is Truth itself, the truth of each man’s relationship with God will be laid bare. The Last Judgment will reveal even to its furthest consequences the good each person has done or failed to do during his earthly life.”55 That is the judgment of transparency in a single sentence. The presence of Christ is the judgment. His truth is the light. And the light reveals all.
“You, then, why do you judge your brother or sister? Or why do you treat them with contempt? For we will all stand before God’s judgment seat. It is written: ‘As surely as I live,’ says the Lord, ‘every knee will bow before me; every tongue will acknowledge God.’ So then, each of us will give an account of ourselves to God.” (Romans 14:10–12)
Paul circles back to the universal scope of the judgment one more time. And here he quotes from Isaiah 45:23—a passage about the sovereignty and uniqueness of God. Every knee will bow. Every tongue will confess. No one is left out. No one escapes the encounter.
The phrase “give an account” in verse 12 is the Greek logon didomi, which means “to give a word” or “to render an explanation.”42 Each person will give an account—not to a distant judge, but to God Himself. And notice, Paul says each person gives an account “of ourselves.” Not of other people. Not of our neighbor’s sins. Of ourselves.
This fits the divine presence model perfectly. The judgment is personal. It is about what is truly in your heart, not about how you compare to anyone else. And the account you give is not really an account you compose. It is an account that is revealed. You do not get to write your own story. The light of Christ exposes the true story—and every knee bows, one way or another, before the overwhelming truth.
Some knees bow in worship, because the truth about them includes the grace and mercy they received in Christ. Other knees bow under the weight of what is revealed—not because God forces them down, but because the truth is so heavy, so undeniable, that they cannot stand.
There is something deeply hopeful here. Paul quotes Isaiah: “Every tongue will acknowledge God.” Not “every tongue will scream in agony.” Not “every tongue will curse God.” Every tongue will acknowledge God. The Greek word exomologeo can mean “to confess” or “to praise.”43 Paul uses this same text in Philippians 2:10–11 to describe the ultimate triumph of Christ: “At the name of Jesus every knee should bow, in heaven and on earth and under the earth, and every tongue acknowledge that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”
The universalists point to this text and say, “See? Everyone will eventually confess Christ as Lord—and that means everyone will be saved.” The conditionalists respond, “The confession may be forced, not voluntary—an acknowledgment of truth, not an embrace of it.” I will not settle that debate here. We will address it more fully in Chapters 30 and 31. But what both sides agree on is this: at the final judgment, truth wins. There is no corner of the universe where a lie can survive the light of Christ. Every hidden thing is revealed. Every false story is corrected. Every self-deception is stripped away.44
And that is exactly what the divine presence model predicts. The judgment is the triumph of truth. The fire of God’s presence burns away everything that is false. What remains is either a heart purified by love—or a heart consumed by its own resistance to love.
There is one more thing to notice in this passage that often gets overlooked. Paul begins this section with a rebuke: “You, then, why do you judge your brother or sister? Or why do you treat them with contempt?” In context, Paul is addressing disputes about food and holy days within the Roman church. Some believers were judging others over matters of conscience. Paul’s response is striking: stop judging each other, because we will all stand before God’s judgment seat.
The implication is powerful. The reason we should not judge others is that we are all equally exposed before God. None of us has the right to play judge, because all of us will soon stand before the real Judge—and His judgment is not like ours. His judgment is not based on the superficial, visible things we use to evaluate each other. His judgment goes deeper. It reaches the secrets. It reads the conscience. It knows the heart. And when that kind of judgment comes, all our petty judgments of each other will be shown up for what they are: arrogant, shortsighted, and often dead wrong.
This is another reason why the divine presence model makes better sense of the judgment passages than the ECT framework. On the ECT view, God’s judgment is essentially the same kind of judgment we exercise—just bigger and more powerful. God looks at the evidence, makes a ruling, and hands down a sentence. But Paul seems to be saying the opposite. God’s judgment is fundamentally different from human judgment. It is not a verdict rendered from outside. It is a revelation of truth from inside. And that is why our own judgments are so inadequate. We can only see the surface. God sees the heart.56
We have now walked through seven of the most important judgment passages in Scripture. And a clear, consistent picture has emerged—a picture that looks very different from the courtroom scene most of us were taught.
In the traditional ECT framework, the final judgment goes something like this: God sits on a throne. He reviews the evidence. He pronounces the verdict. The righteous are rewarded with heaven. The wicked are sentenced to eternal conscious torment in a place of fire and darkness, far from the presence of God.
But that is not what these passages actually describe. Here is what we found instead.
In Revelation 20, the judgment happens when books are opened—not God’s files, but human hearts. The light of the great white throne exposes what is truly in each person. In Daniel 7, a river of fire flows from God’s own throne—the judgment is not separate from God’s presence but flows directly out of it. In Matthew 25, the sheep and the goats are separated not by a legal verdict but by the condition of their hearts when they encounter the glory of the Son of Man. In John 5, Jesus says He does not judge as an earthly judge does—He simply reveals the truth, and the truth itself is the judgment. In Romans 2, God judges people’s secrets through Jesus Christ, and each person is judged by the light of their own conscience. In 2 Corinthians 5, everyone is “made manifest” before the judgment seat—exposed, laid bare, fully known. In Romans 14, every knee bows and every tongue confesses before the God who sees all.
The consistent thread through every single passage is revelation. The judgment is an unveiling. The fire is a light. The books are hearts. The sentence is not imposed from outside—it flows from the collision between perfect truth and the condition of the human soul.
Manis pulls all of these threads together with the concept he calls the “judgment of transparency.” At the final judgment, when Christ is revealed in all His glory and the presence of God fills all things, every human being will be rendered utterly transparent. The deepest truths about each person—what they did, what they desired, what they became, what they refused to become—will be exposed for all to see. For the righteous, this is joy—because what is revealed is the work of grace in their hearts. For the wicked, this is torment—because what is revealed is the ugliness they spent their whole lives hiding.45
And here is the crucial point: on the divine presence model, the judge is not separate from the judgment. The judge is the judgment. Christ’s presence, Christ’s glory, Christ’s light—these are not tools God uses to punish. They are the very reality that produces both heaven and hell. As Fr. Hopko says, “The final coming of Christ will be the judgment of all men. His very presence will be the judgment.”46
Key Argument: Across seven major judgment passages, the consistent picture is not of a courtroom trial but of an apocalyptic unveiling. The judgment is the moment when God’s presence becomes inescapable, the light of Christ penetrates every heart, and the truth about each person is fully and finally revealed. The divine presence model reads the judgment passages more naturally than the ECT framework because it recognizes that the fire of judgment and the glory of God’s presence are one and the same reality.
This is not soft on sin. In fact, it is harder than the ECT reading, in a way. On the ECT view, God punishes from the outside—and the sinner can always tell themselves it is unfair, that the punishment does not fit the crime. On the divine presence model, the punishment comes from the inside—from the sinner’s own heart encountering the truth it cannot escape. There is no one to blame. There is no one to resent. There is only the mirror of God’s light, and the devastating clarity of seeing yourself as you truly are.
The judgment of transparency does not need a torture chamber. It does not need chains, or fire pits, or demons with pitchforks. All it needs is the presence of the God who is Truth and Light. That presence is enough to produce in every heart exactly the response that heart is prepared to give—whether that is worship or weeping, joy or gnashing of teeth.
I want to be clear about something. None of this makes the judgment less serious. If anything, it makes it more serious. On the ECT view, the judgment is something external—something God does to the wicked from the outside. You can always tell yourself the punishment is unfair, that the judge got it wrong, that you did not deserve it. But on the divine presence model, there is nowhere to hide and no one to blame. The judgment comes from the collision between who you truly are and the God who truly is. The truth is the truth. The light is the light. And the only thing that determines whether the light feels like glory or like fire is the condition of your own heart.
That is why Jesus warns so urgently about the danger of self-deception. The Pharisees thought they were righteous. They believed their own press. They had convinced themselves that they were on the right side of God. And Jesus told them—right to their faces—that they were wrong. That their righteousness was a mask. That their hearts were full of greed and self-indulgence (Matthew 23:25). The Pharisees are the perfect picture of what happens at the final judgment to those who have refused to be honest with themselves. When the mask is torn away in the blazing light of Christ’s presence, what is underneath is devastating.57
And that is why the first “unveiling”—the one that happens now, in this life, when we voluntarily open our hearts to God—is so important. Every time we confess our sin. Every time we allow the Holy Spirit to convict us. Every time we stop making excuses and simply tell the truth about ourselves—we are rehearsing for the final judgment. We are getting used to the light. We are letting God soften our hearts now, so that the full blaze of His presence at the end will feel like warmth, not like fire.
As Kalomiros reminds us: “That which will differentiate between one man and another will not be a decision of God, a reward or a punishment from Him, but that which was in each one’s heart; what was there during all our life will be revealed in the Day of Judgment.”47
If the judgment passages are about transparency rather than torture, what difference does it make for the church?
First, it changes how we preach. The call to repentance is not, “Turn to God or He will hurt you.” The call to repentance is, “Turn to God now, while there is still time to have your heart softened, because one day you will stand in the blazing light of His presence and everything about you will be revealed. Would you not rather be healed now than exposed then?” That is a far more honest and far more biblical appeal.48
Second, it changes how we understand holiness. If judgment is transparency, then the point of the Christian life is not to pile up enough good deeds to pass the test. The point is to become the kind of person who can stand in the light without flinching. That means honesty. Vulnerability. Confession. Allowing God’s Spirit to search your heart now, voluntarily, so that the final unveiling is not a horror but a homecoming. As Manis explains, the first “unveiling”—the one that happens in this life when a person voluntarily opens their heart to God—is the preparation for the final unveiling at the judgment.49
Third, it changes how we think about God. On the ECT view, the final judgment reveals a God who is two-faced—loving to the saved, wrathful to the damned. On the divine presence model, the final judgment reveals a God who is perfectly consistent. He is love. He is truth. He is light. And He treats everyone the same. The difference is not in God. The difference is in us.50
And fourth, it gives us a reason to live with urgency. If the fire of judgment is the presence of God Himself, then every moment of our lives is preparation for that encounter. Every act of love makes us more at home in the fire. Every act of selfishness makes us less able to bear it. The judgment is not just something that happens at the end of time. It is something we are rehearsing for every single day.51
I think there is also a fifth implication that we should not miss. The divine presence reading of the judgment gives us a God who can be trusted. On the ECT view, the final judgment is terrifying because it depends on the decision of a judge who may or may not be lenient. You never quite know where you stand. Did you believe enough? Were you sincere enough? Did you pray the right prayer? The anxiety is built into the system, because the judgment is a verdict imposed from outside, and you cannot be sure what the verdict will be.
But on the divine presence model, the judgment is not a verdict imposed from outside. It is the truth about what is already inside you, revealed in the light of the God who is love. That means you can prepare for the judgment not by piling up religious credentials but by learning to be honest—with God, with yourself, with others. The person who has nothing to hide has nothing to fear from the light. And the person who is walking in the light right now, letting God’s Spirit search their heart day by day, is already experiencing in small doses what the final judgment will reveal in full. As the apostle John writes, “If we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship with one another, and the blood of Jesus, his Son, purifies us from all sin” (1 John 1:7).58
Walking in the light now is how we prepare to stand in the light then.
The great white throne is not a courtroom bench. It is the throne of the Lamb. And from that throne flows a river—a river of fire, a river of water, a river of love. For those who love God, the river is life. For those who have hardened their hearts, the river is judgment. But it is the same river. It is the same God. It is the same love.
The books will be opened. And what is in our hearts will be revealed.
The only question is: what will the light find when it shines on you?
↑ 1. Kalomiros, The River of Fire, section XIV. The full text is available online at various Orthodox websites. Kalomiros delivered this address as a lecture in Seattle in 1980.
↑ 2. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “The third unveiling (the judgment of transparency).” See also Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, pp. 363–72.
↑ 3. Throughout Revelation, white is associated with purity and glory: the white hair of the glorified Christ (Rev. 1:14), the white robes of the martyrs (Rev. 6:11), the white garments of the twenty-four elders (Rev. 4:4), and the great white throne itself (Rev. 20:11).
↑ 4. Kalomiros, The River of Fire, section XIV. Kalomiros continues: “If in those hearts there is love for God, those hearts will rejoice in seeing God’s light. If, on the contrary, there is hatred for God in those hearts, these men will suffer by receiving on their opened hearts this penetrating light of truth which they detested all their life.”
↑ 5. Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, pp. 365–67. Manis notes that this is a traditional reading: “It is a traditional idea that the ‘books’ that are opened and read at the Great White Throne judgment of Revelation 22 are (or at least include) the records of individuals’ consciences.” See also Matthew Henry’s commentary on Revelation 20:11–15.
↑ 6. The Greek word apokalupsis (ἀποκάλυψις) comes from apo (“away from”) and kaluptein (“to cover”). It literally means “an uncovering” or “a removing of the veil.” See Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, p. 365, note 99.
↑ 7. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “The presence of God as truth and life.”
↑ 8. See Chapter 21 of this book for the full discussion of the distinction between Hades (the intermediate state) and Gehenna/the lake of fire (the final state). The casting of death and Hades into the lake of fire (Rev. 20:14) signals the end of the intermediate state and the beginning of the eternal order.
↑ 9. See Chapter 22 of this book for the full exegesis of the fire passages. Manis identifies the river of fire (Daniel 7:10), the lake of fire (Revelation 19–21), and the “sea of glass glowing with fire” (Revelation 15:2) as all referring to the divine presence. See Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, p. 388.
↑ 10. Søren Kierkegaard, The Sickness unto Death, trans. Howard V. Hong and Edna H. Hong (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980), 124. Quoted in Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, p. 366.
↑ 11. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “The presence of God as truth and life.”
↑ 12. The Aramaic phrase attiq yomin (עַתִּיק יוֹמִין) appears in Daniel 7:9, 13, and 22. It describes God as the one who is ancient beyond measure, the source and ruler of all time. The title emphasizes God’s eternal sovereignty over all history and all judgment.
↑ 13. Kalomiros, The River of Fire, section XIV. As quoted in Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, p. 253.
↑ 14. Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, pp. 388–89. Manis writes: “Both a river of fire and a river of water, it seems, proceed from the throne of the Lamb. On the divine presence model, these two ‘rivers’ are identical; they are in fact one and the same reality.”
↑ 15. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “Apocalyptic visions.” See also Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, pp. 388–89.
↑ 16. Kalomiros, The River of Fire, section XIV. As quoted in Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, p. 253.
↑ 17. Kalomiros, The River of Fire, section XIV. The icon of the Last Judgment is a standard piece of Orthodox iconography found in churches throughout the Eastern world. Kalomiros describes the icon in detail, pointing out that the river of fire flowing from Christ’s throne reaches both the righteous and the wicked. See also Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos, Life After Death (Levadia: Birth of the Theotokos Monastery, 2000), 14: “The Church shows this in the iconography of the Second Coming. There we see the saints in the light that comes from the throne of God; and from the same throne springs the river of fire, where the unrepentant sinners are.”
↑ 18. The Greek word doxa (δόξα) means “glory, splendor, radiance, honor.” In the New Testament it is used to describe the visible, radiant manifestation of God’s presence. See, e.g., Luke 2:9 (“the glory of the Lord shone around them”); John 1:14 (“we have seen his glory”); 2 Corinthians 3:18 (“the Lord’s glory”).
↑ 19. Matthew 25:35–36: “For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.”
↑ 20. Baker, Razing Hell, pp. 167–69. Baker notes that the parable “says nothing about faith in Christ. It says nothing about receiving Jesus as Savior or off to hell you go. It says nothing at all about repenting of sin.” The criterion is love in action.
↑ 21. Kalomiros, The River of Fire, section XIV: “Fire consumes all those who are not fire themselves, and renders bright and shining all those who are fire themselves.”
↑ 22. Matthew 25:41. Note that the “eternal fire” is said to have been “prepared for the devil and his angels,” not for human beings. Humans are consigned there because of their alignment with the forces opposed to God, not because the fire was designed for them.
↑ 23. The Greek word aionios (αἰώνιος) is derived from aion (“age”). Its precise meaning is debated. In some contexts it clearly means “eternal” (as applied to God), but in other contexts it may mean “pertaining to the age to come” or “age-long.” For a full discussion, see the treatment in Chapter 22 of this book. See also Beauchemin, Hope Beyond Hell, chap. 1; and Ramelli, A Larger Hope?, vol. 1.
↑ 24. The distinction between kolasis (κόλασις, corrective punishment) and timoria (τιμωρία, retributive punishment) is well established in classical Greek usage. See William Barclay, A Spiritual Autobiography (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1977), 65–67.
↑ 25. Aristotle, Rhetoric, 1.10.17. Aristotle explicitly distinguished between kolasis, which is for the benefit of the one punished, and timoria, which is for the satisfaction of the one punishing.
↑ 26. Baker, Razing Hell, pp. 169–70. Baker connects the sheep-and-goats parable directly to her characters “Anne” (the sheep) and “Otto” (the goat), illustrating how each responds differently to the same presence of God.
↑ 27. Kalomiros, The River of Fire, section XIV. See also Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, p. 253.
↑ 28. Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, pp. 370–71. Manis notes that these apparently contradictory claims “fit together to form a coherent picture” on the divine presence model.
↑ 29. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “The third unveiling (the judgment of transparency).” Manis writes: “Christ’s judgment is not a decision about a person’s guilt or innocence; it’s not something that’s made true by declaration. . . . The final judgment is a pronouncement of the existing truth about each individual (‘I judge only as I hear’).”
↑ 30. Romans 2:14–15 (ESV). See Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, pp. 365–66.
↑ 31. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “The third unveiling (the judgment of transparency).” An intimation of this is found in Rob Bell, Love Wins (New York: HarperOne, 2011), 141. Bell tells the story of a man who, during a near-death experience, saw a white light and was instantly seized by a sense that “there were things in him that the light revealed, things he didn’t want revealed.” See Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, p. 364, note 96.
↑ 32. The Greek word krupta (κρυπτά) means “hidden things, secrets.” It is the neuter plural of kruptos (“hidden, secret”). Paul uses this word to indicate that the judgment targets not just outward behavior but the hidden inner life—thoughts, motives, desires that no one else can see.
↑ 33. Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, pp. 364–66. Manis explains that “the final judgment is just: each one is judged according to his or her own understanding.”
↑ 34. Romans 2:15b. The “conflicting thoughts” (logismoi) that accuse or defend are the internal moral arguments every person has with themselves throughout their life. On the day of judgment, this inner record becomes visible.
↑ 35. Note the reflexive language in Romans 2:5: “You are storing up wrath against yourself.” The Greek (thesaurizeis seauto orgen) places the action squarely on the sinner. This is consistent with the divine presence model’s claim that the suffering of hell is self-inflicted, not externally imposed by God.
↑ 36. Romans 2:5 speaks of “the day of God’s wrath, when his righteous judgment will be revealed [apokalupsis].” The use of apokalupsis connects Paul’s language directly to the theme of “unveiling” that runs throughout the New Testament’s teaching on judgment.
↑ 37. On the nature of divine wrath as the natural consequence of encountering God’s holy love with a hardened heart, see the full discussion in Chapters 5–6 and 19 of this book. See also Baker, Razing Hell, chaps. 7–9; Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, Part III.
↑ 38. Fr. Thomas Hopko, The Orthodox Faith: An Elementary Handbook on the Orthodox Church, vol. 4, Spirituality (New York: Department of Religious Education, Orthodox Church in America, 1976), 196–97. Also available at https://oca.org/orthodoxy/the-orthodox-faith/spirituality/the-kingdom-of-heaven/heaven-and-hell. Quoted in Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, pp. 251–52.
↑ 39. The bema (βῆμα) was a raised platform used for public hearings in the Greco-Roman world. Paul was himself brought before a bema in Corinth (Acts 18:12–17). The word carries connotations of public exposure and accountability.
↑ 40. The Greek word phaneroo (φανερόω) means “to make visible, to make known, to manifest.” It is used throughout the New Testament to describe the revealing of hidden realities. See, e.g., John 1:31, 3:21; Romans 1:19; 1 Corinthians 4:5; Colossians 3:4.
↑ 41. Baker, Razing Hell, pp. 165–66. Baker writes: “We will all experience the intense burning love of God that rids us, once and for all, of our remaining impurities. We will all be saved through the fire; but notice that in the Greek ‘saved’ also means ‘healed.’”
↑ 42. The Greek phrase logon didomi (λόγον δίδωμι) literally means “to give a word” or “to give an account.” It was used in the ancient world for rendering an account or explanation, often in a legal or financial context. See BDAG, s.v. “λόγος,” sense 2.b.
↑ 43. The Greek word exomologeo (ἐξομολογέω) can mean “to confess, to acknowledge, to praise.” In the Septuagint (the Greek Old Testament), it is frequently used in the sense of praising or giving thanks to God. Whether the “confession” in Romans 14:11 and Philippians 2:11 is willing praise or forced acknowledgment is debated.
↑ 44. For the universalist reading of these texts, see Thomas Talbott, The Inescapable Love of God, 2nd ed. (Eugene, OR: Cascade, 2014), chaps. 5–6. For the CI response, see Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “Answering the universalist’s objection, parts I and II.” For the full discussion of CI vs. UR, see Chapters 30–31 of this book.
↑ 45. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “The third unveiling (the judgment of transparency).” Manis writes: “For those who’ve remained in their sins through persistence in self-deception and hardness of heart, the experience is bitter. Because these individuals were never transparent to themselves, the transparency that is now forced upon them results in ‘weeping and gnashing of teeth.’”
↑ 46. Hopko, The Orthodox Faith, vol. 4, 196–97. Quoted in Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, p. 251.
↑ 47. Kalomiros, The River of Fire, section XIV.
↑ 48. For a development of this approach to preaching about hell, see Baker, Razing Hell, chap. 12; and Phillips, What If Hell Is God’s, Not the Devil’s?, “God’s Signature Tune.”
↑ 49. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “The first and second unveilings.” Manis describes the first unveiling as an individual’s voluntary act of opening their heart to the Lord, allowing Him to begin the process of inner transformation. This is the preparation for the final, involuntary unveiling at the day of judgment.
↑ 50. Kalomiros, The River of Fire, section XIV: “The difference is in man, not in God. The difference is conditioned by the free choice of man, which God respects absolutely.” See also Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, pp. 254–55.
↑ 51. As the Catechism of the Catholic Church states (1039): “In the presence of Christ, who is Truth itself, the truth of each man’s relationship with God will be laid bare. The Last Judgment will reveal even to its furthest consequences the good each person has done or failed to do during his earthly life.” Quoted in Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, p. 365, note 98.
↑ 52. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “Heaven and hell on the divine presence model.” Manis writes: “Hell is a separation not from God’s presence but from communion with Him; it is an inability—made permanent through hardness of heart and persistence in sin—to experience God’s love as love.”
↑ 53. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “The third unveiling (the judgment of transparency),” subsection “Jesus and the Pharisees.” Manis writes: “The crucial distinction between the two groups lies in the relationship that the members of each have to their own sin. When confronted with their sins, those in the former group are willing to acknowledge the truth about themselves, while those in the latter group are not.”
↑ 54. See John 3:19–21: “This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but people loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that their deeds will be exposed. But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what they have done has been done in the sight of God.” This passage from Jesus Himself ties the theme of judgment directly to the theme of light and exposure.
↑ 55. Catechism of the Catholic Church, 1039. Quoted in Manis, Sinners in the Presence of a Loving God, p. 365, note 98.
↑ 56. See 1 Samuel 16:7: “The LORD does not look at the things people look at. People look at the outward appearance, but the LORD looks at the heart.” This principle runs throughout Scripture and is central to the divine presence model’s understanding of judgment.
↑ 57. Manis, Thinking Through the Problem of Hell, “The third unveiling (the judgment of transparency),” subsection “Jesus and the Pharisees.” See also Matthew 23:25–28, where Jesus describes the Pharisees as “whitewashed tombs, which look beautiful on the outside but on the inside are full of the bones of the dead and everything unclean.” This is a vivid picture of what the judgment of transparency will expose.
↑ 58. 1 John 1:7. John’s first epistle is saturated with the imagery of light and darkness, truth and deception, love and hatred. These are the same themes that define the divine presence model of judgment. Walking in the light, for John, is not about sinless perfection but about honesty, transparency, and ongoing openness to God’s purifying work. See also 1 John 1:8–9: “If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness.”